Hi Admins,
We have Exchange 2010, SP2, RU3 with multiple Hub Transport servers but no Edge
servers. My question is, other than to get Test-ServiceHealth to run without
errors what is the benefit/reason for running this service? Can it be left
stopped?
I use the ExchangeserverPro website as a
We have a request to raise our message size limit to 50 MB for external
addresses. I am wondering how may others are able to receive messages of this
size?
Please consider replying directly to salf...@rockefeller.edu if you do not wish
to post a message size limit.
I thank you for your
Our limit is 10MB but, we also offer employees a file transfer system that
handles upwards of 2 GB.
Regards,
Don Guyer
Catholic Health East - Information Technology
Enterprise Directory Messaging Services
3805 West Chester Pike, Suite 100, Newtown Square, Pa 19073
email: dgu...@che.org
I've seen a number of higher-ed customers pushed in the last few years up to
25MB or 30MB. None of my clients have one as high as 50MB though.
I would suggest using a different tool. Regardless of what you may be told,
email is not a file-transfer mechanism.
-Original Message-
From:
Ours are 15mb, guess it all depends on business need, how big your pipes are,
if the other bits of infrastructure can handle it from server throughput to
storage to mailbox size limits to online vs cached mailboxes to ost's to...
etc.
Personally wouldn't want to go that big due to the
Nope. 25MB max here.
-Original Message-
From: bounce-9582497-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[mailto:bounce-9582497-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of Steven
Alfano
Sent: 15 February 2013 14:15
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: message size limit
We have a request
We do same, commonly push to 25MB for 'normal' customers and 50MB for
architects and engineers. At both 25MB and 50MB, we usually bump into other
peoples size requirements (it becomes a 'not our problem' issue), and for the
bigger stuff we use box/dropbox/ftp daemons.
I have a prior thread
20MB here - but under protest...
-Paul
-Original Message-
From: Steven Alfano [mailto:salf...@mail.rockefeller.edu]
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2013 8:15 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: message size limit
We have a request to raise our message size limit to 50 MB for external
At both 25MB and 50MB, we usually bump into other peoples size requirements
(it becomes a 'not our problem' issue
I have been taking that approach for years and it has served me well. Once you
hit 25 MB it is hardly ever your problem. Still need to help the user get the
file they need, but at
Oddly enough IIRC Microsoft FOPE's limit is 250MB.
Sent on the run!
On 15 Feb 2013, at 16:40, Maglinger, Paul pmaglin...@scvl.com wrote:
20MB here - but under protest...
-Paul
-Original Message-
From: Steven Alfano [mailto:salf...@mail.rockefeller.edu]
Sent: Friday, February
Exchange Online (Office 365) is 25 MB. I don't know about FOPE (now known as
EOP) directly, though.
-Original Message-
From: Peter Johnson [mailto:johnson.pet...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2013 9:59 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: message size limit
Oddly enough
30MB :-)
Gregg Overly
Technology Resources - Core Systems
Texas State University
1-512-245-6861
gr...@txstate.edu
-Original Message-
From: Peter Johnson [mailto:johnson.pet...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2013 8:59 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: message size
We have a 25 MB limit on our email and I'm constantly showing our users
that the bounce back is from the receivers server since they have smaller
limits. AutoCAD users always want more (I used to be an AutoCAD user 17
years ago so I know). :)
Now, with all the 3D they are doing it is never
nitpick
It's not a collaboration if someone plays a flute by themselves.
From: Patrick Salmon [mailto:psal...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2013 8:34 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: OT: Friday Fun
Ahem. First Space-to-Earth Collaboration isn't. Trailing in the wake
I'm sorry, please give me a link. I'll ask for it to be clarified.
No, the upgrade dismounts the databases on the current copy. Which should all
be passive.
From: Sobey, Richard A [mailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk]
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2013 10:08 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE:
With the advent of stuff like DropBox I find that this stuff isn't so much of
an issue anymore.
Sent from my Blackberry, which may be an antique but delivers email RELIABLY
-Original Message-
From: Overly, Gregg gr...@txstate.edu
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 15:14:30
To: MS-Exchange Admin
That's very situational...
DropBox in our environment for certain types of data would be a no-no.
Regards,
Don Guyer
Catholic Health East - Information Technology
Enterprise Directory Messaging Services
3805 West Chester Pike, Suite 100, Newtown Square, Pa 19073
email: dgu...@che.org
Office:
Thanks MBS.
It's in the release notes for SP3. It was actually there for SP2, too:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj965774%28v=exchg.141%29.aspx#BKMK_DatabaseSchemaUpgrades
I'm trying to think of a situation that would even let this happen. The best I
can think of is if you want to
nitpick back on ;)
Live Collaboration. What you are describing sounds like a done after the fact
collaboration.
For the record. Americans Schirra and Stafford played the first song in space.
A duet with a harmonica...Jingle Bells.
Google for DataNow
I've implemented several of these appliances and they are becoming very popular
for implementing DropBox-style functionality in the enterprise
Sent from my Blackberry, which may be an antique but delivers email RELIABLY
-Original Message-
From: Guyer, Don
Does anyone worry about allowing corporate users access to a system that allows
them to share possible corporate confidential data to the public?
-Original Message-
From: kz2...@googlemail.com [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2013 7:39 AM
To: Heaton,
Most of my clients (including educational clients) strictly prohibit the use of
such technology for corporate data.
-Original Message-
From: Heaton, Joseph@Wildlife [mailto:joseph.hea...@wildlife.ca.gov]
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2013 12:46 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OT:
Indeed, which is where the DataNow kit seems to be proving very popular
Sent from my Blackberry, which may be an antique but delivers email RELIABLY
-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 18:05:16
To: MS-Exchange Admin
You are going to have to give us the details of exactly - and I mean exactly -
what you did to create the rule.
From: Beach Computers Web Hosting [mailto:gro...@beachcomp.com]
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2013 1:35 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2013 ignoring Mailflow rule
Hi
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 6:15 AM, Steven Alfano
salf...@mail.rockefeller.edu wrote:
We have a request to raise our message size limit to 50 MB for external
addresses. I am wondering how may others are able to receive messages of
this size?
Please consider replying directly to
Yes, I worry a lot, but I can't get a corporate policy against it yet,
and it's tough arguing with the executives about it.
Kurt
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 9:46 AM, Heaton, Joseph@Wildlife
joseph.hea...@wildlife.ca.gov wrote:
Does anyone worry about allowing corporate users access to a system that
Exchange admin center Mail Flow Rules
Test Rule
If the message...
Apply to all messages
Do the following...
Append the message with the disclaimer 'dssddsdsds'.Rule mode
Audit and notify
Version: 14.0.0.0
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Friday,
We just block 'mass storage' sites with web sense. SkyDrive, DropBox, etc.
Not sure how effective that actually is but it's something we block.
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, I worry a lot, but I can't get a corporate policy against it yet,
and
I don't know if our Barracuda can do that - haven't looked - but what
about folks who have laptops and take them out of the office?
Of course, in some sense this is futile - webmail is one way around
it, and so is ftp, unless you block those as well.
Kurt
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 12:47 PM,
Embrace these possibilities with the right software, don't just block them out
:-)
Sent from my Blackberry, which may be an antique but delivers email RELIABLY
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 13:18:13
To: MS-Exchange Admin
You mean like with EMAIL? I came from YouSendIt which is a competitor of
Box, Dropbox, etc and I was part of the AD team that built out the
Enterprise version of YouSendIt's product. We developed centralized
management tools for IT Admins to allow/not allow the use of YSI within a
corporation,
As I mentioned in an earlier email, we have a company ftp site, and
I'm looking at hosting a dropbox-like solution at $work as an
alternative.
I see the need, the trouble is getting management buy-in for setting
up the better alternatives.
Kurt
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 1:26 PM,
I think the well-popularized DropBox hack should have seen to that (was it
DropBox? Memory fails me this late at night, and I'm celebrating a bit too)
Sent from my Blackberry, which may be an antique but delivers email RELIABLY
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com
You would think, but they don't.
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 1:44 PM, kz2...@googlemail.com wrote:
I think the well-popularized DropBox hack should have seen to that (was it
DropBox? Memory fails me this late at night, and I'm celebrating a bit too)
Sent from my Blackberry, which may be an
Well, the corporate version of this type of software is what we would allow.
But, unfortunately, we have lots of people who have gone off on their own and
signed up for personal accounts, and are using that to share out data, which is
a huge no-no. I'd be interested in looking at versions
The DataNow client consolidates DropBox, google drive and the like together
with the DataNow stuff and controls movement of data between them. Its quite
clever really
Sent from my Blackberry, which may be an antique but delivers email RELIABLY
-Original Message-
From: Heaton,
36 matches
Mail list logo
