RE: Iphone/Ipad Data usage question.

2013-04-03 Thread Guyer, Don
Chances are his mailbox went over the size limit before he tried to send the photo. Regardless, either up his mailbox limit or have him clean up. I wouldn't worry about what events happened when, that's just a waste of time at this point. Regards, Don Guyer Catholic Health East - Information

RE: Iphone/Ipad Data usage question.

2013-04-03 Thread Paul Cookman
It is more about knowing that the Exchange/Ipad is capable of causing this, Ipad will send the full 7.5meg email up to the exchange before it gets rejected. We have to dismiss to be sure nobody is watching Videos or anything else... From: Guyer, Don [mailto:dgu...@che.org] Sent: 03 April 2013

RE: Installing Exchange 2010 RU updates

2013-04-03 Thread Michael B. Smith
You can do it through RDP. What a quaint question. :) Take a look at this, for some things to think about: http://theessentialexchange.com/blogs/michael/archive/2011/12/07/installing-exchange-2010-service-pack-2.aspx From: Todd Lemmiksoo [mailto:tlemmik...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 3,

RE: Installing Exchange 2010 RU updates

2013-04-03 Thread Randal, Phil
Not sure if this is absolutely necessary, but it might prevent a problem or two. Run the update from an admin (elevated rights) command prompt. Doing it via RDP is fine. If your boxes run Forefront for Exchange, you might find this blog post of mine useful, though it might not be needed for

RE: Iphone/Ipad Data usage question.

2013-04-03 Thread Guyer, Don
It is more about knowing that the Exchange/Ipad is capable of causing this, Ipad will send the full 7.5meg email up to the exchange before it gets rejected. - No, it won't. It will sit in his mailbox until the mailbox is under the limit, same behavior as Outlook. We have to dismiss

Re: Installing Exchange 2010 RU updates

2013-04-03 Thread Todd Lemmiksoo
Thank you all for the tips. Todd Lemmiksoo On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 8:07 AM, Randal, Phil phil.ran...@hoopleltd.co.ukwrote: Not sure if this is absolutely necessary, but it might prevent a problem or two. Run the update from an admin (elevated rights) command prompt. Doing it via RDP

Re: IPhone/IPad Data usage question.

2013-04-03 Thread Graeme Carstairs
In the uk Most data plans in fact everyone I've seen only include download to the device Not upload So in the uk this would not affect his plan no matter how the photo was sent. YMMV On Wednesday, 3 April 2013, John Matteson wrote: Depends on how he’s connecting from the iPad to the

RE: IPhone/IPad Data usage question.

2013-04-03 Thread Guyer, Don
Lucky you! Just checked with ATT and Verizon here and both sent/received are charged against data plan. Regards, Don Guyer Catholic Health East - Information Technology Enterprise Directory Messaging Services 3805 West Chester Pike, Suite 100, Newtown Square, Pa 19073 email:

Exchange 2010 is /PrepareLegacyExchangePermissions necessary

2013-04-03 Thread Connolly, Peter
All, Getting ready to extend the schema for Exchange 2010 SP3. We are native Exchange 2007. It seems unnecessary to run setup /PrepareLegacyExchangePermissions as we do not have any servers running Exchange 2003. Any caveats to not running this command? Thanks! Peter --- To manage

RE: Exchange 2010 is /PrepareLegacyExchangePermissions necessary

2013-04-03 Thread Michael B. Smith
If you need it, and try not to run it, you'll get a pre-req failure later on. So you are fine. Go for it. -Original Message- From: Connolly, Peter [mailto:pjc...@buffalo.edu] Sent: Wednesday, April 3, 2013 2:04 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 2010 is

RE: Soft Delete Issues in Exchange 2010 SP2 RU6 and SP3

2013-04-03 Thread Stringham, Steven
Just a note on updating to Ex2010 SP3. I presently use Exclaimers and Scanmail for Exchange 10.2xx from Trend Micro on my servers. Exclaimers was ready for SP3 but Scanmail was not. Trend told me that it will be ready with version 11.x available in May/June. Also, now that I am on SP2 RU6

RE: Soft Delete Issues in Exchange 2010 SP2 RU6 and SP3

2013-04-03 Thread Michael B. Smith
Trend has no excuse for that. They’ve had SP3 as long as I have. I’ll ask about the KB. But why don’t you use cached mode? From: Stringham, Steven [mailto:sstri...@lrlaw.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 3, 2013 3:01 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Soft Delete Issues in Exchange 2010 SP2

Re: Soft Delete Issues in Exchange 2010 SP2 RU6 and SP3

2013-04-03 Thread Steve Ens
I use Trend WFBA and have upgraded to Exchange 2010 Sp3, no issues here. On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Stringham, Steven sstri...@lrlaw.comwrote: ** Just a note on updating to Ex2010 SP3. I presently use Exclaimers and Scanmail for Exchange 10.2xx from Trend Micro on my servers.

RE: Soft Delete Issues in Exchange 2010 SP2 RU6 and SP3

2013-04-03 Thread Stringham, Steven
Agreed on the Trend item. Thanks on the KB. Cached mode Now that is a touchy subject around here. 1) some of the addin's we are using in the past have been problems. 2) Some of our mailboxes are huge. This makes caching them impossible. Many, many of them are over 20gig. My top one (last

RE: Soft Delete Issues in Exchange 2010 SP2 RU6 and SP3

2013-04-03 Thread Michael B. Smith
2.6 TB is the maximum size of the OST file. That’s theoretical. It’s been tested (I know) up to 150 GB for Exchange 2010 and probably beyond that for Exchange 2013. My cached OST is 23 GB. Works great. ☺ (And I’m on Outlook 2010 because I can’t stand the new Outlook 2013 theme colors.) The

Re: 2013 mass delegation

2013-04-03 Thread Ravi N
Hi, You can definitely use shell to achieve this. Get all the salaes persons alias or emailaddresses into a notepad. use the following command on the exchange shell $sales=Get-content c:\salespersons.txt foreach($person in $sales) { Add-MailboxFolderPermission -Identity $person:\Calendar -User

Re: Mailbox - Deleted Items and Recoverable Items - remove all retention from specific mailboxes

2013-04-03 Thread Ravi N
Hi Dana, Sorry I was not able to reply. But have already tried this? Did that help? Thank you, Ravi On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 3:51 AM, xyz x...@minneapolis.edu wrote: Ravi, Thanks for your reply. I have been considering that option as well, but was not sure if the mailbox