Nope, I don't think so.
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Cameron Cooper ccoo...@aurico.com wrote:
We are looking to purchase a new server and exchange 2010 with Windows
Server 2008 R2. Currently we are running exchange 2003 on a Windows 2003 R2
Server. Can the two servers be clustered with
: 847-255-1896
ccoo...@aurico.com | www.aurico.com
From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 10:47 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Clustering Exchange Servers
Nope, I don't think so.
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Cameron Cooper ccoo
No.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Cameron Cooper [mailto:ccoo...@aurico.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 11:46 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Clustering Exchange Servers
Sensitivity: Confidential
We are looking to
-4021 | Fax: 847-255-1896
ccoo...@aurico.commailto:ccoo...@aurico.com | www.aurico.com
From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 10:47 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Clustering Exchange Servers
Nope, I don't think so.
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10
[mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 10:52 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Clustering Exchange Servers
No.
Clustering requires the same OS and the same version of Exchange.
If the old server is x64 capable, you could conceivably cluster them by
re
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 4:40 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Clustering Exchange
Funny you should mention Marathon Technologies, I went to a briefing this
week about their kit, it looks very interesting if expensive. I have two
main complaints about Windows
Title: Message
Hi,
may I have the article no, if possible?
thanks!
-Original Message-From: Lathrum Matt-P55173
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 2002119
9:37To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Clustering
Exchange
Be careful - Active/Active
clustering
Title: Message
Our
cluster actually corrupted our Priv.edb TWICE
-Original Message-From: Gerald BAI (NCS)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 3:02
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Clustering
Exchange
Hi, may I have the article
unir cevinpl.
-Original
Message-
From: Gerald BAI (NCS)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002
2:02 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Clustering Exchange
Hi,
may I have the article no, if possible?
thanks!
-Original
Message-
From: Lathrum
]]
Sent: 17 January 2002 19:06
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Clustering Exchange
We run www.marathontechnologies.com. Better than clustered.
-Original Message-
From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 12:37 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin
-Original Message-
From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 3:03 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Clustering Exchange
Yell - Hey ClusterBoy! and maybe he'll help.
-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday
Title: Message
Huh?
Can you elaborate?
-Original Message-From: Benjamin Winzenz
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002
12:57 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
Clustering Exchange
However, the level of
"cluster-aware&quo
Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Clustering
Exchange
Huh?
Can you elaborate?
-Original Message-From: Benjamin Winzenz
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002
12:57 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
Clustering Exchange
However, the level of
"cl
better than 4.0EE, but 4.0EE
works great in my book.
-Original Message-From: Rick Ward - HQ
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 12:52
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Clustering
Exchange
For 5.5 I say NIYET - Is it doable but you gain
Network/Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
-Original Message-
From: Arnold, Jamie
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January
18, 2002 1:50 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Clustering Exchange
Huh?
Can you
elaborate?
-Original Message
You can do it with Dell for under $15K
-Original Message-
From: Darrin J. Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 12:49 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Clustering Exchange
If you have a lot of money there are several solutions.
http
Title: Message
I don't feel wealthy.
%^)
Who ever thought up that silly name anyway?
-Original Message-From: Lefkovics,
William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January
18, 2002 1:50 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
Clustering Exchange
I
think
PBBBTTT!
-Original Message-
From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 12:37 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Clustering Exchange
Didn't we just go
Title: Message
I
thought it was clusterf@%*
-Original Message-From: Arnold, Jamie
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 2:09
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Clustering
Exchange
WHOA
-Original Message-From: Lefkovics
Title: Message
That's my cousin.we don't talk to that part of the family
anymore
-Original Message-From: Scot Parsons
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 2:22
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Clustering
Exchange
I
thought
He'll make that Cluster of Exchange really hummm (ya...try to find
something that rhymes with pub)
//CB
-Original Message-From: Lefkovics,
William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January
18, 2002 2:09 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
Clustering Exc
Title: Message
WHOA
-Original Message-From: Lefkovics,
William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January
18, 2002 2:02 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
Clustering Exchange
I
did change it to ClusterKing
-Original Message-From
y, January 18, 2002 11:09
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Clustering
Exchange
WHOA
-Original Message-From: Lefkovics,
William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January
18, 2002 2:02 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
Clustering Exchange
I
Title: Message
I did
change it to ClusterKing
-Original Message-From: Arnold, Jamie
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 11:00
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Clustering
Exchange
I don't feel wealthy.
%^)
Who ever thought up that silly name
is outlawed,
bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl.
-Original
Message-
From: Arnold, Jamie
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002
11:54 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Clustering Exchange
H
How about being
able to test a service pack without effecting
Didnt we just go over this, this morning?? Oh that was on the other
list. There is no good cluster other then the single node. DO NOT built
a cluster server period.
Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..
-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
If you have a lot of money there are several solutions.
http://www.directplus.compaq.com/dstore/default.asp?page=ctoBasesProduc
tLineId=431Family_Id=650
http://www.win2000mag.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=3670
http://www.nsisoftware.com/main/pages/Products/DTspec.html
No I'm not a sales
Title: RE: Clustering Exchange
For 5.5 I say NIYET - Is it doable but you gain no real advantages in doing it, as 5.5 isn't truly cluster aware.
For XCHG2000 I say DAH - IF you have a solid cluster solution with known HCL Server hardware. I recommend Compaq's cluster solutions as I have
: 17 January 2002 17:37
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Clustering Exchange
Didn't we just go over this, this morning?? Oh that was on the other
list. There is no good cluster other then the single node. DO
NOT built
a cluster server period.
Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg
Title: RE: Clustering Exchange
However, the level of "cluster-aware"
is very dependant on the person that is setting it up. I can think of
some that I would not want setting up any types of clusters.
Ben Winzenz, MCSE
Network/Systems Administrator
Peregri
An OWA web farm?
-Original Message-
From: Martin Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:56 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Clustering Exchange
I disagree. You can have fantastic clusters with up to thirty two
machines that will give you
I have installed the NSI Double-Take solution for exchange. It's a really slick
package as long as you set it up properly. We have failed over the exchange services
twice with very successful results. This was on an NT 4.0 SP6a and Exchange 5.5 SP3
environment. The target server is the
Using F5 load balancers
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:55 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Clustering Exchange
An OWA web farm?
-Original Message-
From: Martin Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL
We run www.marathontechnologies.com. Better than clustered.
-Original Message-
From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 12:37 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Clustering Exchange
Didn't we just go over this, this morning?? Oh
Title: RE: Clustering Exchange
I currenlty have 9 exchange clusters. I am using Ms Clustering.. It works.. not to bad.. When you failover you do have a little response time isue but its a few sec. You have to de side on what type of clustering you want..
Active / passive
Active / Active
I
Yell - Hey ClusterBoy! and maybe he'll help.
-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:33 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Clustering Exchange
My immediate supervisor mentioned that when we finally get new Exchange
36 matches
Mail list logo
