RE: License Question

2002-01-22 Thread Neil Hobson
Question Here is another important one http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q148810 -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 6:05 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: License Question 1,512,435,659,022 characters is da bomb

RE: License Question

2002-01-21 Thread Lefkovics, William
Question Perzactly! BTW, good Q article dude. I have never seen that. -Original Message-From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 5:56 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: License Question

RE: License Question

2002-01-21 Thread Martin Blackstone
Title: Message That's your favorite. -Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 5:55 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: License Question Not as good as this one, though, eh? http

RE: License Question

2002-01-21 Thread Lefkovics, William
Question That's your favorite. -Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 5:55 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: License Question Not as good as this one, though, eh? http://support.microsoft.com

RE: License Question

2002-01-21 Thread Martin Blackstone
Title: Message 1,512,435,659,022 characters is da bomb! -Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 6:03 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: License Question Only today. Tomorrow I'll revert

RE: License Question

2002-01-21 Thread Martin Blackstone
Title: Message Here is another important one http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q148810 -Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 6:05 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: License Question 1,512,435,659,022

RE: License Question

2002-01-21 Thread Clark, Steve
9:19 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: License Question Here is another important one http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q148810 http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q148810 -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday

RE: License Question

2002-01-21 Thread Jennifer Baker
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 6:19 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: License Question Here is another important one http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q148810 -Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone

RE: License Question

2002-01-21 Thread Martin Blackstone
: Monday, January 21, 2002 7:39 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: License Question Speaking of important articles, does anyone have a copy of the Msexchange article: Q259895 XADM: List of Performance Counters Added by Squeaky Lobster? Microsoft took it out of the kb database

RE: License Question

2002-01-21 Thread Martin Blackstone
PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 7:39 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: License Question Speaking of important articles, does anyone have a copy of the Msexchange article: Q259895 XADM: List of Performance Counters Added by Squeaky Lobster? Microsoft took it out

RE: License Question

2002-01-21 Thread Jennifer Baker
Title: Message You call that help? You should be working for NAI. -Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 8:04 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: License Question http://www.mstp.quantico.usmc.mil

RE: License Question

2002-01-21 Thread Martin Blackstone
Title: Message Then could I call on you at CA? -Original Message-From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 8:12 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: License Question You call that help? You should be working for NAI

RE: License Question

2002-01-21 Thread Jennifer Baker
Title: Message I deserved that. -Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 8:16 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: License Question Then could I call on you at CA? -Original Message

RE: License Question

2002-01-21 Thread Martin Blackstone
Title: Message Lets not fight... -Original Message-From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 8:20 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: License Question I deserved that. -Original Message-From: Martin

RE: License Question

2002-01-18 Thread Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.
-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: License Question Don't forget the NT4.0/Win2K CAL for those home users too. When they authenticate, they require a CAL. When you license per seat, it doesn't matter if the seat is at the office or at home. Jacqueline -Original Message

RE: License Question

2002-01-18 Thread Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.
Title: Message See Q168633. Steve -Original Message-From: Moody, Jacqueline [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 11:30 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: License Question Don't forget the NT4.0/Win2K CAL for those home users too. When

RE: License Question

2002-01-18 Thread Leone, Michael
, January 18, 2002 8:52 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: License Question I beg to differ, but Exchange 5.5 users do not need an NT4 CAL UNLESS they use file or print services (plain old mail users use neither). Steve -Original Message-From: Moody, Jacqueline

RE: License Question

2002-01-18 Thread Martin Blackstone
be sure to verify this with your MS rep and get it in writing. -Original Message-From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 5:52 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: License Question I

RE: License Question

2002-01-18 Thread Martin Blackstone
: License Question See Q168633. Steve -Original Message-From: Moody, Jacqueline [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 11:30 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: License Question Don't forget the NT4.0/Win2K CAL for those home users too

RE: License Question

2002-01-18 Thread Micciche, Robert
, 2002 8:59 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: License Question Correct. An Exchange CAL is always needed, regardless of where or how (OWA or mail client) you access your mailbox; an NT CAL is not. -Original Message-From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office

RE: License Question

2002-01-18 Thread Micciche, Robert
Title: RE: License Question Your missing what I said. "The ONLY server in the Domain." That means it is a PDC, and Exchange. If it's a PDC, and is the only Server that they authenticate to the clients need an NT Server CAL in addition to the Exchange CAL. That is of cours

RE: License Question

2002-01-16 Thread Dawn R. Ashford
Title: RE: Outlook question Practical experience tells me it's based on users that are currently logged on. (I have SBS 4.5 with Exchange 5.5) I can create all the accounts I want;but before we upgraded to the maximum amount of client licenses (50 for SBS) I would get the "out of license"

RE: License Question

2002-01-16 Thread Moody, Jacqueline
Exchange and Bar Code Admn. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:55 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: License Question Exchange CAL for everyone who OWA's in from home? Say it ain't so, Bill. -Original Message-From: Moody, Jacqueline

RE: License Question

2002-01-16 Thread Moody, Jacqueline
Title: Message SBS is licensed differently than the single packaged product. -Original Message-From: Dawn R. Ashford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 10:49 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: License Question We have SBS so it's all

RE: License Question

2002-01-16 Thread Moody, Jacqueline
Title: Message This is taken from the EULA out of an Exchange 5.5 box. I excerpted the pertinent info. 1.b. Use of the Server Software- ... You must acquire a separate Client Access LIcense to access or otherwise utilize the services of the Server Software installed on a Server, whether