Question
Here is another important one
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q148810
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 6:05 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: License Question
1,512,435,659,022 characters is da bomb
Question
Perzactly! BTW, good Q article dude. I have never seen
that.
-Original Message-From: Ropiak Steve -
NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 5:56 AMTo: MS-Exchange
Admin IssuesSubject: RE: License Question
Title: Message
That's
your favorite.
-Original Message-From: Lefkovics,
William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January
21, 2002 5:55 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
License Question
Not
as good as this one, though, eh?
http
Question
That's
your favorite.
-Original Message-From: Lefkovics,
William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January
21, 2002 5:55 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
License Question
Not
as good as this one, though, eh?
http://support.microsoft.com
Title: Message
1,512,435,659,022
characters is da
bomb!
-Original Message-From: Lefkovics,
William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January
21, 2002 6:03 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
License Question
Only
today.
Tomorrow I'll revert
Title: Message
Here
is another important one
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q148810
-Original Message-From: Martin
Blackstone Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 6:05 PMTo:
MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: License
Question
1,512,435,659,022
9:19 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: License Question
Here is another important one
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q148810
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q148810
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone
Sent: Monday
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday,
January 21, 2002 6:19 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin
IssuesSubject: RE: License Question
Here
is another important one
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q148810
-Original Message-From: Martin
Blackstone
: Monday, January 21, 2002 7:39
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: License
Question
Speaking of important articles, does
anyone have a copy of the Msexchange article: Q259895 XADM: List of Performance Counters Added by Squeaky
Lobster? Microsoft took it out of the kb database
PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 7:39
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: License
Question
Speaking of important articles, does
anyone have a copy of the Msexchange article: Q259895 XADM: List of Performance Counters Added by Squeaky
Lobster? Microsoft took it out
Title: Message
You
call that help? You should be working for NAI.
-Original Message-From: Martin
Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday,
January 21, 2002 8:04 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin
IssuesSubject: RE: License Question
http://www.mstp.quantico.usmc.mil
Title: Message
Then
could I call on you at CA?
-Original Message-From: Jennifer Baker
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 8:12
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: License
Question
You
call that help? You should be working for NAI
Title: Message
I
deserved that.
-Original Message-From: Martin
Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday,
January 21, 2002 8:16 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin
IssuesSubject: RE: License Question
Then
could I call on you at CA?
-Original Message
Title: Message
Lets
not fight...
-Original Message-From: Jennifer Baker
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 8:20
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: License
Question
I
deserved that.
-Original Message-From: Martin
-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
License Question
Don't forget the NT4.0/Win2K CAL for those home users too. When
they authenticate, they require a CAL. When you license per seat, it
doesn't matter if the seat is at the office or at home.
Jacqueline
-Original Message
Title: Message
See
Q168633.
Steve
-Original Message-From: Moody, Jacqueline
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, January 16,
2002 11:30 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
License Question
Don't forget the NT4.0/Win2K CAL for those home users too. When
, January 18, 2002 8:52
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: License
Question
I
beg to differ, but Exchange 5.5 users do not need an NT4 CAL UNLESS they use
file or print services (plain old mail users use neither).
Steve
-Original Message-From: Moody, Jacqueline
be sure to verify this with your MS rep and get it in
writing.
-Original Message-From: Ropiak Steve -
NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 5:52 AMTo: MS-Exchange
Admin IssuesSubject: RE: License Question
I
: License Question
See
Q168633.
Steve
-Original Message-From: Moody, Jacqueline
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, January 16,
2002 11:30 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
License Question
Don't forget the NT4.0/Win2K CAL for those home users too
, 2002
8:59 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: License
Question
Correct. An Exchange CAL is always needed, regardless of where or how
(OWA or mail client) you access your mailbox; an NT CAL is
not.
-Original Message-From: Ropiak Steve - NAO
Florence Office
Title: RE: License Question
Your
missing what I said. "The ONLY server in the
Domain." That means it is a PDC, and Exchange. If it's a PDC, and is
the only Server that they authenticate to the clients need an NT Server CAL in
addition to the Exchange CAL.
That
is of cours
Title: RE: Outlook question
Practical experience tells me it's based on users that are
currently logged on. (I have SBS 4.5 with Exchange 5.5) I can create
all the accounts I want;but before we upgraded to the maximum amount of
client licenses (50 for SBS) I would get the "out of license"
Exchange and Bar Code Admn. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:55 AMTo: MS-Exchange
Admin IssuesSubject: RE: License Question
Exchange CAL for everyone who OWA's in from home? Say it ain't
so, Bill.
-Original Message-From: Moody, Jacqueline
Title: Message
SBS is
licensed differently than the single packaged product.
-Original Message-From: Dawn R. Ashford
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002
10:49 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: License
Question
We have SBS so it's all
Title: Message
This
is taken from the EULA out of an Exchange 5.5 box. I excerpted the
pertinent info.
1.b.
Use of the Server Software- ... You must acquire a separate Client Access
LIcense to access or otherwise utilize the services of the Server Software
installed on a Server, whether
25 matches
Mail list logo