Hello,
I have a general question on channel binding, exim is one of the few
application offering CB.
RFC 5929 Channel Bindings for TLS defines the tls-unique channel
binding, stating that there was an old tls-unique, which was bad. The
new tls-unique uses the most recent TLS Finished message
Hello,
imagine, a mail envolope contains many recipient, The server accepts the first
recipients and rejects the last
recipients, meaning “Too many recipients in this transaction”.
RFC 821 specifies the reply code 452 as “Insufficient storage”, which RFC 5821
amends, by stating that 452 can
To: meta1+feedb...@meta1.org,
CC: exim-dev@exim.org, Andrew C Aitchison ,
Hello,
please enable in Meta1 PRDR by default (e.g. when Meta1 acts as client), for
the reasons described at
https://lists.exim.org/lurker/message/20190111.221619.049721de.en.html (and
below).
Currently
Hello,
I subscribed to exim-dev, but somehow I have not received this message
https://lists.exim.org/lurker/message/20190112.210337.b527c995.en.html
nor I see in the archives my second message about Meta1.
Anyway, implementing Sieve’s ereject will make it very easy to do rejecting per
Hello,
the last discussion about PRDR
http://www.eric-a-hall.com/specs/draft-hall-prdr-00.txt on ietf-s...@ietf.org
was in
March 2014.
https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-smtp/current/msg07655.html
The question was if PRDR will make any progress. One of the answers was that
nobody
