[exim-dev] [Bug 2314] Raise event (also) when ignore_error is true

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2314 --- Comment #4 from Matthias Kurz --- Created attachment 1128 --> https://bugs.exim.org/attachment.cgi?id=1128=edit Move acl that logs events into own file -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- ## List

[exim-dev] [Bug 2311] DANE verify fails with a TA-mode TLSA and a selfsigned server cert

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2311 Git Commit changed: What|Removed |Added CC||g...@exim.org --- Comment #5 from Git Commit ---

[exim-dev] [Bug 2314] Raise event (also) when ignore_error is true

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2314 Matthias Kurz changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #1105|0 |1 is obsolete|

[exim-dev] [Bug 2314] Raise event (also) when ignore_error is true

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2314 --- Comment #9 from Matthias Kurz --- Created attachment 1133 --> https://bugs.exim.org/attachment.cgi?id=1133=edit Changelog -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- ## List details at

[exim-dev] [Bug 2311] DANE verify fails with a TA-mode TLSA and a selfsigned server cert

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2311 Jeremy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|ni...@exim.org

[exim-dev] [Bug 2314] Raise event (also) when ignore_error is true

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2314 --- Comment #5 from Matthias Kurz --- Created attachment 1129 --> https://bugs.exim.org/attachment.cgi?id=1129=edit Allow other domains than domain1 in event logger acl -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. --

[exim-dev] [Bug 2314] Raise event (also) when ignore_error is true

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2314 --- Comment #7 from Matthias Kurz --- Created attachment 1131 --> https://bugs.exim.org/attachment.cgi?id=1131=edit Raise msg:fail:delivery when an error of a failed bounce gets ignored Test when prop.ignore_error gets set in deliver.c in line 7436

[exim-dev] [Bug 2314] Raise event (also) when ignore_error is true

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2314 --- Comment #6 from Matthias Kurz --- Created attachment 1130 --> https://bugs.exim.org/attachment.cgi?id=1130=edit msg:fail:delivery if ignore_error was set from within a filter This patch handles ALL the cases where prop.ignore_error gets set

[exim-dev] [Bug 2314] Raise event (also) when ignore_error is true

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2314 --- Comment #8 from Matthias Kurz --- Created attachment 1132 --> https://bugs.exim.org/attachment.cgi?id=1132=edit Raise event for syntactically invalid generated recipient in autoreply transport even when error is ignored Test when

[exim-dev] [Bug 2314] Raise event (also) when ignore_error is true

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2314 --- Comment #10 from Matthias Kurz --- Jeremy, this should be done now. Patch 2+3 just move the event logger ACL in a separate file so we can easily re-use it for other tests. There are test cases for ALL the cases where prop.ignore_error get set to

Re: [exim-dev] buildfarm client proposal: tests configure support

Phil Pennock via Exim-dev (Sa 15 Sep 2018 03:34:35 CEST): > I've made the buildfarm repos visible† on git.exim.org since there's > nothing secret in them and we point folks to them on public wiki pages, > and all the repos can be cloned without authentication. > > I've pushed to

[exim-dev] [Bug 2310] event_action fires/expands with -Mg flag, but not with -Mrm

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2310 --- Comment #18 from Matthias Kurz --- Thanks Jeremy! I saw you didn't set acl_where? Was that intentional? Or just not needed? Also there is a typo in the changelog: > ...message is manually reoved... Should probably be "...removed...". -- You are

[exim-dev] [Bug 2310] event_action fires/expands with -Mg flag, but not with -Mrm

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2310 --- Comment #19 from Jeremy Harris --- Just not needed. We could create another value if we really cared, but unless we need different processing anywhere in the ACL handling, or that value gets exposed as a variable... we don't. Thank for spotting