On 19/12/2018 00:51, Phil Pennock via Exim-dev wrote: > I think this change is generally useful, in having a cleaner setup for a > very common use-case, and showing exactly where new macros should be > defined, which can reduce some of the pain encountered by newcomers to > Exim.
The wording "should be" could be relaxed slightly, maybe, since it isn't required by Exim's parsing. "It is simplest to", perhaps? I see you quietly removed prdr. Has it been seen to cause problems? On multi_domain - some really stupid hosts (hi, Google!) can't handle it, and will _always_ temp-reject any RCPT after the first domain (G gives an explicit text error saying it can't hack it). -- Cheers, Jeremy -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
