[exim-dev] [Bug 2994] New: dsearch subdir should only filter "." and ".."

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2994 Bug ID: 2994 Summary: dsearch subdir should only filter "." and ".." Product: Exim Version: 4.97 Hardware: x86 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: security

[exim-dev] [Bug 2995] New: dsearch should only require search permission

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2995 Bug ID: 2995 Summary: dsearch should only require search permission Product: Exim Version: 4.97 Hardware: x86 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: bug

[exim-dev] [Bug 2980] exiqgrep -i broken

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2980 Jeremy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added CC||exim...@mehtap.tv --- Comment #4 from Jeremy

[exim-dev] [Bug 2993] wishlist for method to correctly create valid headers like SomeHeader:${format_header: .....}

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2993 Jeremy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[exim-dev] [Bug 2912] cutthrough delivery gets canceled on unexpected (non 2xx) SMTP response

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2912 Jeremy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[exim-dev] [Bug 2992] -i broken exiqgrep

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2992 Jeremy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[exim-dev] [Bug 2992] New: -i broken exiqgrep

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2992 Bug ID: 2992 Summary: -i broken exiqgrep Product: Exim Version: 4.95 Hardware: x86 OS: Windows Status: NEW Severity: bug Priority: medium

[exim-dev] [Bug 2993] New: wishlist for method to correctly create valid headers like SomeHeader:${format_header: .....}

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2993 Bug ID: 2993 Summary: wishlist for method to correctly create valid headers like SomeHeader:${format_header: .} Product: Exim Version: 4.95 Hardware: All OS:

[exim-dev] [Bug 2843] wishlist for method to correctly create valid headers like SomeHeader:${format_header: .....}

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2843 exim 1st changed: What|Removed |Added CC||exim...@mehtap.tv --- Comment #5 from exim 1st ---

[exim-dev] [Bug 2987] $spam_score_int calculation for negative values is off-by-one

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2987 exim 1st changed: What|Removed |Added CC||exim...@mehtap.tv --- Comment #2 from exim 1st ---

[exim-dev] [Bug 2843] wishlist for method to correctly create valid headers like SomeHeader:${format_header: .....}

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2843 Jeremy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAIT_FIX_CONFIRMATION |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[exim-dev] [Bug 2985] Better means for stripping bad Authentication-Results headers

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2985 Jeremy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAIT_FIX_CONFIRMATION |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[exim-dev] [Bug 2912] cutthrough delivery gets canceled on unexpected (non 2xx) SMTP response

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2912 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Mechtersheimer --- (In reply to Jeremy Harris from comment #2) > Changing the message does not show up in the testsuite. > > I'm interested if you saw the meesage in "normal" output? Debug? > Or is this purely from

[exim-dev] [Bug 2912] cutthrough delivery gets canceled on unexpected (non 2xx) SMTP response

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2912 --- Comment #4 from Jeremy Harris --- Possibly exim is not the right tool for you, if you want no store-and-forward. Something close to a pure proxy would be better, though I'm unclear how complex your routing needs are. Nor, indeed, why email can't be

[exim-dev] [Bug 2989] No error provided after invalid characters in local-part of To: header

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2989 --- Comment #2 from Matt --- The problem I had specifically was on a cPanel server, where Exim encountered the problem, didn't return an error to the SMTP client, and didn't send the message either. This resulted in the client thinking the message was

[exim-dev] [Bug 2932] The preexpand option must be appended to run with ', ' but without a whitespace

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2932 Jeremy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[exim-dev] [Bug 2912] cutthrough delivery gets canceled on unexpected (non 2xx) SMTP response

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2912 --- Comment #2 from Jeremy Harris --- Changing the message does not show up in the testsuite. I'm interested if you saw the meesage in "normal" output? Debug? Or is this purely from code-inspection? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on

[exim-dev] [Bug 2702] XCLIENT ESMTP extension

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2702 Jeremy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[exim-dev] [Bug 2989] No error provided after invalid characters in local-part of To: header

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2989 Jeremy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|No error provided after |No error provided after

[exim-dev] [Bug 2912] cutthrough delivery gets canceled on unexpected (non 2xx) SMTP response

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2912 Jeremy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[exim-dev] [Bug 2972] ACL check "!verify = reverse_host_lookup" gives error

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2972 Jeremy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME Status|NEW

[exim-dev] [Bug 2947] dkim=fail (signature did not verify) delivery to Microsoft Exchange

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2947 Jeremy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[exim-dev] [Bug 2989] No error provided after invalid characters in local-part

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2989 Jeremy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|Exim 4.96 |Exim 4.98+ Severity|bug

[exim-dev] [Bug 2989] New: No error provided after invalid characters in local-part

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2989 Bug ID: 2989 Summary: No error provided after invalid characters in local-part Product: Exim Version: 4.96+ Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW

[exim-dev] [Bug 2987] $spam_score_int calculation for negative values is off-by-one

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2987 Martin Kealey changed: What|Removed |Added CC||from-exim-bugzilla@kurahaup |

[exim-dev] [Bug 2988] New: $domain usable in a non-multi-domain transport

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2988 Bug ID: 2988 Summary: $domain usable in a non-multi-domain transport Product: Exim Version: 4.96 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: wishlist

[exim-dev] [Bug 2987] $spam_score_int calculation for negative values is off-by-one

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2987 Jeremy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|medium |low -- You are receiving this mail because:

[exim-dev] [Bug 2988] $domain usable in a non-multi-domain transport

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2988 Jeremy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|medium |low -- You are receiving this mail because:

[exim-dev] [Bug 2702] XCLIENT ESMTP extension

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2702 Jeremy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|Exim 4.95 |Exim 4.97

[exim-dev] [Bug 2987] New: $spam_score_int calculation for negative values is off-by-one

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2987 Bug ID: 2987 Summary: $spam_score_int calculation for negative values is off-by-one Product: Exim Version: 4.97 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW

[exim-dev] [Bug 2986] src/configure.default did not know that port 465 is official.

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2986 Andrew Aitchison changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED

[exim-dev] [Bug 2986] src/configure.default did not know that port 465 is official.

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2986 Jeremy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAIT_FIX_CONFIRMATION --- Comment #1 from

[exim-dev] [Bug 2985] Better means for stripping bad Authentication-Results headers

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2985 Jeremy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAIT_FIX_CONFIRMATION --- Comment #1 from

[exim-dev] [Bug 2984] uninitialized value in runtest

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2984 Jeremy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[exim-dev] [Bug 2986] src/configure.default did not know that port 465 is official.

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2986 Jeremy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unalloca...@exim.org|jgh146...@wizmail.org Target Milestone|Exim

[exim-dev] [Bug 2984] uninitialized value in runtest

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2984 Jeremy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|medium |low Target Milestone|Exim 4.96

[exim-dev] [Bug 2985] Better means for stripping bad Authentication-Results headers

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2985 Jeremy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- You are receiving this mail

[exim-dev] [Bug 2980] exiqgrep -i broken

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2980 --- Comment #3 from Jeremy Harris --- 8ff2ba119ba6 introduces a cmdline option for exim to output only message-ids for the queue. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- ## List details at

[exim-dev] [Bug 2979] Long SMTP response can result in deliverable bounce

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2979 Jeremy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|WAIT_FIX_CONFIRMATION

[exim-dev] [Bug 2827] bounce generated by exim gets too long lines breaching message_linelength_limit limit

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2827 --- Comment #3 from Jeremy Harris --- Oddly, there's already a limit of 12 ref items in a generated References: - so the above example with 50-char items only make on order of 600. We should also impose a 998-char limit for them, but it's not obviously

[exim-dev] [Bug 2827] bounce generated by exim gets too long lines breaching message_linelength_limit limit

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2827 Jeremy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|ASSIGNED

[exim-dev] [Bug 2986] New: src/configure.default did not know that port 465 is official.

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2986 Bug ID: 2986 Summary: src/configure.default did not know that port 465 is official. Product: Exim Version: N/A Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW

[exim-dev] [Bug 1760] bounces may have overlong lines

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1760 Jeremy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ar...@maven.pl --- Comment #4 from Jeremy

[exim-dev] [Bug 2985] New: Better means for stripping bad Authentication-Results headers

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2985 Bug ID: 2985 Summary: Better means for stripping bad Authentication-Results headers Product: Exim Version: 4.95 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW

[exim-dev] [Bug 2982] Writing logs to standard output

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2982 --- Comment #2 from ivanov17 --- Hello, Martin! Maybe I didn't explain well what's going on. I am running Exim in an OCI container. This assumes that only the Exim process will run in the container. Exim itself works well in a containerized

[exim-dev] [Bug 2982] Writing logs to standard output

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2982 Martin Kealey changed: What|Removed |Added CC||from-exim-bugzilla@kurahaup |

[exim-dev] [Bug 2982] Writing logs to standard output

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2982 Jeremy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Status|NEW

[exim-dev] [Bug 2843] wishlist for method to correctly create valid headers like SomeHeader:${format_header: .....}

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2843 --- Comment #2 from Arkadiusz Miskiewicz --- Thanks, will test in next couple of weeks. Is that new functionality usable for fixing #2827 internally ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- ## List details at

[exim-dev] [Bug 2843] wishlist for method to correctly create valid headers like SomeHeader:${format_header: .....}

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2843 --- Comment #3 from Jeremy Harris --- While it could be used, it'd be far from optimal (as Richard points out) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- ## List details at

[exim-dev] [Bug 2984] New: uninitialized value in runtest

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2984 Bug ID: 2984 Summary: uninitialized value in runtest Product: Exim Version: 4.96+ Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: bug Priority: medium

[exim-dev] [Bug 2982] Writing logs to standard output

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2982 --- Comment #3 from Martin Kealey --- "syslog over UDP is unreliable" is one of those things that while technically true, us rarely a real problem. Loss of UDP packets is caused by two factors: the underlying transport dropping oackets, and the

[exim-dev] [Bug 2843] wishlist for method to correctly create valid headers like SomeHeader:${format_header: .....}

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2843 Jeremy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAIT_FIX_CONFIRMATION --- Comment #1 from

[exim-dev] [Bug 2982] Writing logs to standard output

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2982 --- Comment #5 from ivanov17 --- Hello, Jeremy! It just means that people will continue to create multilog for their Exim containers using tricks and bad practices because people want to read the logs. Common practice is to store logs from thousands of

[exim-dev] [Bug 1687] Option to limit the length of a physical (header?) line

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1687 Jeremy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.exim.org/show_ |

[exim-dev] [Bug 2843] wishlist for method to correctly create valid headers like SomeHeader:${format_header: .....}

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2843 Jeremy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.exim.org/show_ |

[exim-dev] [Bug 2982] New: Writing logs to standard output

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2982 Bug ID: 2982 Summary: Writing logs to standard output Product: Exim Version: 4.96 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: wishlist Priority:

[exim-dev] [Bug 2941] More convenient option behavior for containerized environments

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2941 --- Comment #6 from ivanov17 --- Thank you, Jeremy and Heiko! I am sorry for my lack of attention, I really missed the statement that options that undergo string expansion before use are marked with †. Now I'm using a simply configuration where I

[exim-dev] [Bug 2981] New: Chapter 32 - Retry configuration. Section - 10 Long-term failures.

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2981 Bug ID: 2981 Summary: Chapter 32 - Retry configuration. Section - 10 Long-term failures. Product: Exim Version: N/A Hardware: x86 OS: All Status: NEW

[exim-dev] [Bug 2890] autoreply driver: return_path option not working for that driver

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2890 --- Comment #4 from Jeremy Harris --- It's still an automatic response. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at

[exim-dev] [Bug 2890] autoreply driver: return_path option not working for that driver

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2890 --- Comment #5 from Arkadiusz Miskiewicz --- And standards do not prohibit that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at

[exim-dev] [Bug 138] Use shared memory segment for queue list

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138 --- Comment #8 from Jeremy Harris --- Fast queue ramp is now supported by default. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at

[exim-dev] [Bug 2922] exim using random ipv6 for sending outbound mail

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2922 Jeremy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[exim-dev] [Bug 2890] autoreply driver: return_path option not working for that driver

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2890 Jeremy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[exim-dev] [Bug 2980] exiqgrep -i broken

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2980 --- Comment #1 from Jeremy Harris --- I'm not sure why you'd want to have no selector option as a usable function? Using "-i" in combination with a selector would not be affected by the proposed change. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[exim-dev] [Bug 2890] autoreply driver: return_path option not working for that driver

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2890 --- Comment #3 from Arkadiusz Miskiewicz --- It's not a bounce but regular message, just autogenerated, using autoreply exim driver functionality. Standards AFAIK say nothing about sender for such message. So your claim seems wrong. And preventing

[exim-dev] [Bug 452] Request variable(s) to show which item has matched in a list

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=452 Jeremy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unalloca...@exim.org|jgh146...@wizmail.org Resolution|---

[exim-dev] [Bug 2980] exiqgrep -i broken

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2980 --- Comment #2 from Douglas Phillips --- -i by itself is useful in processing the output from another command which was piped in (for example exim -bp) or if one needed to purge the entire queue (e.g., if a PHP had been abused or there was a runaway

[exim-dev] [Bug 2980] New: exiqgrep -i broken

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2980 Bug ID: 2980 Summary: exiqgrep -i broken Product: Exim Version: N/A Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: bug Priority: medium

[exim-dev] [Bug 2979] Long SMTP response can result in deliverable bounce

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2979 Jeremy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAIT_FIX_CONFIRMATION --- Comment #1 from

[exim-dev] [Bug 2956] util to convert message id to human-readable time

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2956 --- Comment #16 from Andrew Aitchison --- Created attachment 1438 --> https://bugs.exim.org/attachment.cgi?id=1438=edit Mention exim_msgdate in ChangeLog and NewStuff Mention exim_msgdate in ChangeLog and NewStuff -- You are receiving this mail

[exim-dev] [Bug 1684] Malformed headers which exceed length spec willingly passed to remote servers

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1684 --- Comment #18 from Jeremy Harris --- Tracking as bug 2979. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##

[exim-dev] [Bug 2979] Long SMTP response can result in deliverable bounce

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2979 Jeremy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.exim.org/show_ |

[exim-dev] [Bug 2979] New: Long SMTP response can result in deliverable bounce

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2979 Bug ID: 2979 Summary: Long SMTP response can result in deliverable bounce Product: Exim Version: 4.95 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: bug

[exim-dev] [Bug 2979] Long SMTP response can result in deliverable bounce

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2979 Jeremy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[exim-dev] [Bug 1684] Malformed headers which exceed length spec willingly passed to remote servers

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1684 Jeremy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.exim.org/show_ |

[exim-dev] [Bug 1684] Malformed headers which exceed length spec willingly passed to remote servers

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1684 --- Comment #17 from Patrick Cernko --- Sorry, I only checked the Changelogs and missed that there is a separate NewStuff file. The SMTP error was a reject after DATA due to spamassassin results. The error message included a longer report from

[exim-dev] [Bug 1684] Malformed headers which exceed length spec willingly passed to remote servers

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1684 --- Comment #16 from Jeremy Harris --- It would help a lot if you could say what sort of SMTP error message. The message_linelength_limit introduction was noted, with it's default value, in the NewStuff file file for 4.95 -- You are receiving this

[exim-dev] [Bug 1684] Malformed headers which exceed length spec willingly passed to remote servers

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1684 Patrick Cernko changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pcer...@mpi-klsb.mpg.de --- Comment #15 from

[exim-dev] [Bug 2956] util to convert message id to human-readable time

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2956 Jeremy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added Version|4.97|4.96 Target Milestone|Exim 4.96

[exim-dev] [Bug 2956] util to convert message id to human-readable time

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2956 Jeremy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added Version|4.96+ |4.97 -- You are receiving this mail because:

[exim-dev] [Bug 2956] util to convert message id to human-readable time

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2956 Jeremy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[exim-dev] [Bug 2956] util to convert message id to human-readable time

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2956 --- Comment #14 from Andrew Aitchison --- > --- Comment #12 from Jeremy Harris --- > Looking good. One issue in timezone handling: > > $eximdir/exim_msgdate -C /data/jgh/git/exim/test/test-config > 1pEPHo-005xgk-2e > 2023-01-08

[exim-dev] [Bug 2956] util to convert message id to human-readable time

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2956 --- Comment #13 from Andrew Aitchison --- Created attachment 1437 --> https://bugs.exim.org/attachment.cgi?id=1437=edit timezone.sanity.patch -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- ## List details at

[exim-dev] [Bug 2956] util to convert message id to human-readable time

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2956 --- Comment #12 from Jeremy Harris --- Looking good. One issue in timezone handling: $eximdir/exim_msgdate -C /data/jgh/git/exim/test/test-config 1pEPHo-005xgk-2e 2023-01-08 06:36:04.082000 GMT $ TZ=PDT eximdir/exim_msgdate -C

[exim-dev] [Bug 2956] util to convert message id to human-readable time

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2956 Andrew Aitchison changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #1435|0 |1 is obsolete|

[exim-dev] [Bug 2956] util to convert message id to human-readable time

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2956 John Jetmore changed: What|Removed |Added CC||j...@pobox.com --- Comment #9 from John Jetmore

[exim-dev] [Bug 2956] util to convert message id to human-readable time

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2956 Jasen Betts changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ja...@treshna.com --- Comment #10 from Jasen

[exim-dev] [Bug 2956] util to convert message id to human-readable time

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2956 --- Comment #8 from Jeremy Harris --- (In reply to Andrew Aitchison from comment #7) > > It's using a hardwired config file path, at least in the testsuite. > > Noticing the -C the testharness gave it would be good; > > I've got that working, which

[exim-dev] [Bug 2956] util to convert message id to human-readable time

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2956 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Aitchison --- > It's using a hardwired config file path, at least in the testsuite. > Noticing the -C the testharness gave it would be good; I've got that working, which confuses me. I had expected that to pass one of the

[exim-dev] [Bug 2956] util to convert message id to human-readable time

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2956 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Aitchison --- Created attachment 1435 --> https://bugs.exim.org/attachment.cgi?id=1435=edit exim_msgdate utility Thought I might as well give you the patch. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[exim-dev] [Bug 2956] util to convert message id to human-readable time

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2956 --- Comment #6 from Jeremy Harris --- - It's using a hardwired config file path, at least in the testsuite. Noticing the -C the testharness gave it would be good; but for production use - how about using `exim -bP localhost_number' as a default for

[exim-dev] [Bug 2956] util to convert message id to human-readable time

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2956 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Aitchison --- I have a patch ready to submit, but I am not sure what to call the utility. My working name is exim_msgdate but it should really have "msgid" in it. eximmsgiddate has doubled letters in the wrong places. Existing

[exim-dev] [Bug 2956] util to convert message id to human-readable time

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2956 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Aitchison --- Oops. Accidentally submitted the previous comment prematurely. Part 2 should have included the suggestion: Use echo BASE_62 | sed -e "s?BASE_62?$${BASE_62:-62}?" with doubled $ if you test inside a Makefile.

[exim-dev] [Bug 2434] information about time from start of smtp connection exists only for some log messages

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2434 Jeremy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|WAIT_FIX_CONFIRMATION

[exim-dev] [Bug 2904] "bad memory reference" errors in paniclog

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2904 Jasen Betts changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ja...@treshna.com --- Comment #5 from Jasen Betts

[exim-dev] [Bug 2956] util to convert message id to human-readable time

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2956 --- Comment #2 from Jeremy Harris --- Hmm, yes, that will indeed make the testsuite awkward. That's the right set of lines to be bypassing in runtest. Options are parsed around line 3060. Add a bit in README about the optinn you invent. -- You are

[exim-dev] [Bug 2872] Unable to select ONLY TLSv1.3 CHACHA20-POLY1305 cipher

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2872 --- Comment #11 from help@novo.media --- There is a fundamental philosophical difference between my understanding and the developers, in that, Exim tries to be consistent/compatible over different libraries, TLS versions, connection directions and

[exim-dev] [Bug 2904] "bad memory reference" errors in paniclog

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2904 --- Comment #6 from Chance Rollins --- That is encouraging to hear. Is there any estimated release timeline for 4.97? Thank you very much Jasen. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- ## List details at

[exim-dev] [Bug 2904] "bad memory reference" errors in paniclog

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2904 Jeremy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |ALREADY_FIXED Status|REOPENED

[exim-dev] [Bug 2904] "bad memory reference" errors in paniclog

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2904 Jeremy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME Status|NEW

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >