https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1684
--- Comment #18 from Jeremy Harris ---
Tracking as bug 2979.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim
details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1684
Jeremy Harris changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.exim.org/show_
|
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1684
--- Comment #17 from Patrick Cernko ---
Sorry, I only checked the Changelogs and missed that there is a separate
NewStuff file.
The SMTP error was a reject after DATA due to spamassassin results. The error
message included a longer report from
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1684
--- Comment #16 from Jeremy Harris ---
It would help a lot if you could say what sort of SMTP error message.
The message_linelength_limit introduction was noted, with it's default
value, in the NewStuff file file for 4.95
--
You are receiving this
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1684
Patrick Cernko changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pcer...@mpi-klsb.mpg.de
--- Comment #15 from
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1684
Arkadiusz Miskiewicz changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.exim.org/show_
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1684
fel...@felipegasper.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fel...@felipegasper.com
--- Comment
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1684
Jeremy Harris changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1684
--- Comment #12 from Git Commit ---
Git commit:
https://git.exim.org/exim.git/commitdiff/0de9945258c2e7910c35f715caf07c5e9270aa1b
commit 0de9945258c2e7910c35f715caf07c5e9270aa1b
Author: Jeremy Harris
AuthorDate: Tue May 12 23:10:08 2020 +0100
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1684
Jeremy Harris changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |---
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1684
Andreas Metzler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||eximus...@bebt.de
---
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1684
Jeremy Harris changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1684
Git Commit changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||g...@exim.org
--- Comment #8 from
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1684
Jeremy Harris changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1684
Jeremy Harris changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|h...@schlittermann.de |jgh146...@wizmail.org
On Sat, Oct 03, 2015 at 07:34:28PM +, ad...@bugs.exim.org wrote:
> remote_smtp:
> driver = smtp
> message_size_limit = ${if > {$max_received_linelength}{998} {1}{0}}
Is "message_size_limit" really a line-length limit? If so, the
name seems rather misleading. More likely, I would guess,
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1684
--- Comment #6 from Jeremy Harris ---
$max_received_linelength is already populated with the relevant value.
This can be checked in the smtp_data acl and the smtp transports:
acl_check_data:
denycondition = ${if >
On 03/10/15 20:42, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 03, 2015 at 07:34:28PM +, ad...@bugs.exim.org wrote:
>
>> remote_smtp:
>> driver = smtp
>> message_size_limit = ${if > {$max_received_linelength}{998} {1}{0}}
>
> Is "message_size_limit" really a line-length limit?
No, and reading
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 10:53:03PM +0200, Heiko Schlittermann wrote:
> Viktor Dukhovni (Mi 30 Sep 2015 22:25:14 CEST):
> > On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 07:39:11PM +, ad...@bugs.exim.org wrote:
> >
> > > We should also consider body lines; the spec (rfc 5322 section 2.3)
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1684
Jeremy Harris changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jgh146...@wizmail.org
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 07:39:11PM +, ad...@bugs.exim.org wrote:
> We should also consider body lines; the spec (rfc 5322 section 2.3) says the
> same limit applies. Probably the same variable should control behaviour and
> the name should reflect this.
Yes, the Postfix SMTP client
On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 12:00:55AM +0200, Heiko Schlittermann wrote:
> > > Or did I get somethow wrong?
> > > Because I wouldn't expect to get my my plain text non-mime body lines
> > > folded in any way. But I could accept a server rejecting my message
> > > because of overlong physical body
Viktor Dukhovni (Mi 30 Sep 2015 23:10:08 CEST):
...
> All lines over 998 bytes, whether header or body. The SMTP protocol
> requires all lines to be under 1000 bytes include the CRLF, so all
> lines are folded by default.
>
> > Or did I get somethow wrong?
> > Because
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1684
Rubin changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.exim.org/show_
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1684
--- Comment #4 from Heiko Schlittermann ---
According to the spec, header_line_maxsize imposes a limit on the total length
of all joined lines of a specific header - so it's limit on the logical line
length.
And I'm sure you'll
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1684
--- Comment #3 from Rubin ---
Note that adding:
header_line_maxsize = 998
to the main config section, will stop exim from accepting messages that cause
this.
I propose the default value of that variable should be changed to that.
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1684
Rubin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ru...@afternet.org
--- Comment #1
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1684
--- Comment #2 from Heiko Schlittermann ---
Exim should not accept messages with such oversized lines. This can be
accomplished by an ACL entry in the DATA ACL.
Once the message is accepted, Exim should do it's best to transmit
28 matches
Mail list logo