https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2162
Jeremy Harris changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|WAIT_FIX_CONFIRMATION
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2162
Jeremy Harris changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAIT_FIX_CONFIRMATION
--- Comment #7 from Jeremy
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2162
Git Commit changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||g...@exim.org
--- Comment #6 from Git Commit ---
G
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2162
Jeremy Harris changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|t...@duncanthrax.net
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2162
--- Comment #4 from Thomas B ---
(In reply to Jeremy Harris from comment #3)
> Nobody's plucked up the enthusiasm yet. And (I think) the ARC specification
> has not yet been finalized?
I think the same : it seems they are working on the 10th draft
Yet
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2162
--- Comment #3 from Jeremy Harris ---
Nobody's plucked up the enthusiasm yet. And (I think) the ARC specification
has not yet been finalized?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
## List details at https://li
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2162
thomas.be...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||thomas.be...@gmail.com
--- Comment #2 fr
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2162
--- Comment #1 from Jeremy Harris ---
To anyone planning to work on this: at this date the spec for ARC hasn't quite
shaken down yet:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/4Gu1EErK4iuo9pQnZ-uJ2tKpMDQ
It's also up for discussion whether signing nee