[exim-dev] [Bug 2250] Peculiarity with SMTP delivery in Exim 4.90.1

2018-03-16 Thread admin--- via Exim-dev
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2250 Git Commit changed: What|Removed |Added CC||g...@exim.org --- Comment #19 from

[exim-dev] [Bug 2250] Peculiarity with SMTP delivery in Exim 4.90.1

2018-03-14 Thread admin--- via Exim-dev
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2250 Jeremy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|ni...@exim.org |jgh146...@wizmail.org

[exim-dev] [Bug 2250] Peculiarity with SMTP delivery in Exim 4.90.1

2018-03-14 Thread admin--- via Exim-dev
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2250 --- Comment #17 from David Carter --- (In reply to David Carter from comment #16) > (In reply to David Carter from comment #14) > > > I will start bisection with DKIM disabled. > > 4a5cbaff2f9addfc9b4375a97ec6669bf18ee4db (Tue Sep 19

[exim-dev] [Bug 2250] Peculiarity with SMTP delivery in Exim 4.90.1

2018-03-09 Thread admin--- via Exim-dev
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2250 --- Comment #16 from David Carter --- (In reply to David Carter from comment #14) > I will start bisection with DKIM disabled. 4a5cbaff2f9addfc9b4375a97ec6669bf18ee4db (Tue Sep 19 21:57:30 2017 +0100) has the problem. That predates

[exim-dev] [Bug 2250] Peculiarity with SMTP delivery in Exim 4.90.1

2018-03-09 Thread admin--- via Exim-dev
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2250 --- Comment #15 from David Carter --- (In reply to David Carter from comment #13) > That patch doesn't apply cleanly to "80a47a2c96". It looks like quite a long > has changed since then, so I'm going to need some help applying the same

[exim-dev] [Bug 2250] Peculiarity with SMTP delivery in Exim 4.90.1

2018-03-09 Thread admin--- via Exim-dev
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2250 --- Comment #14 from David Carter --- (In reply to David Carter from comment #13) > (In reply to David Carter from comment #12) > > > I am currently running ae06ddc47aa43bb5e2dcbe2643e41649d1947a9d (latest > > available commit from

Re: [exim-dev] [Bug 2250] Peculiarity with SMTP delivery in Exim 4.90.1

2018-03-09 Thread Jeremy Harris via Exim-dev
On 09/03/18 13:25, admin--- via Exim-dev wrote: > That patch doesn't apply cleanly to "80a47a2c96". It looks like quite a long > has changed since then, so I'm going to need some help applying the same fix > to > intermediate versions. 80a47a2c96 was 2006; you're only looking for problems

[exim-dev] [Bug 2250] Peculiarity with SMTP delivery in Exim 4.90.1

2018-03-09 Thread admin--- via Exim-dev
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2250 --- Comment #13 from David Carter --- (In reply to David Carter from comment #12) > I am currently running ae06ddc47aa43bb5e2dcbe2643e41649d1947a9d (latest > available commit from origin/exim-4_90+fixes), and that still has the >

[exim-dev] [Bug 2250] Peculiarity with SMTP delivery in Exim 4.90.1

2018-03-09 Thread admin--- via Exim-dev
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2250 --- Comment #12 from David Carter --- (In reply to David Carter from comment #8) > > I suggest modifying Exim so that it doesn't return 5xx on NULL characters. > > Return 4xx instead so that it will retry? That way you can collect more

[exim-dev] [Bug 2250] Peculiarity with SMTP delivery in Exim 4.90.1

2018-03-08 Thread admin--- via Exim-dev
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2250 --- Comment #11 from Jeremy Harris --- I don't think there were any real howlers in that sequence. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- ## List details at

Re: [exim-dev] [Bug 2250] Peculiarity with SMTP delivery in Exim 4.90.1

2018-03-08 Thread Heiko Schlittermann via Exim-dev
admin--- via Exim-dev (Do 08 Mär 2018 14:24:47 CET): > https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2250 > > --- Comment #10 from David Carter --- > I guess I will need to try bisection with the 4xy suggestion to minimise > fallout. > > Any obvious points between

[exim-dev] [Bug 2250] Peculiarity with SMTP delivery in Exim 4.90.1

2018-03-08 Thread admin--- via Exim-dev
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2250 --- Comment #10 from David Carter --- I guess I will need to try bisection with the 4xy suggestion to minimise fallout. Any obvious points between 4.89.1 and 4.90.1 that I need to avoid as they introduce nasty bugs? -- You are

[exim-dev] [Bug 2250] Peculiarity with SMTP delivery in Exim 4.90.1

2018-03-08 Thread admin--- via Exim-dev
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2250 --- Comment #9 from Jeremy Harris --- Depends whether the bug is deterministic for that recipient string. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- ## List details at

[exim-dev] [Bug 2250] Peculiarity with SMTP delivery in Exim 4.90.1

2018-03-08 Thread admin--- via Exim-dev
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2250 --- Comment #8 from David Carter --- > I suggest modifying Exim so that it doesn't return 5xx on NULL characters. > Return 4xx instead so that it will retry? That way you can collect more > instances of the issue without dropping

[exim-dev] [Bug 2250] Peculiarity with SMTP delivery in Exim 4.90.1

2018-03-08 Thread admin--- via Exim-dev
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2250 --- Comment #7 from Simon Arlott --- (In reply to David Carter from comment #4) > > I assume that a bisect isn't viable? > > It would be awkward. I would be willing to try a couple of subdivisions to > try and narrow

[exim-dev] [Bug 2250] Peculiarity with SMTP delivery in Exim 4.90.1

2018-03-08 Thread admin--- via Exim-dev
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2250 --- Comment #6 from David Carter --- > It's a puzzler. The fact that I only seem to see these errors for messages from lists.cam.ac.uk is curious. Actually, no: If I search my logs for the last 28 days I _do_ find some examples

[exim-dev] [Bug 2250] Peculiarity with SMTP delivery in Exim 4.90.1

2018-03-08 Thread admin--- via Exim-dev
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2250 --- Comment #5 from Graeme Fowler --- So in the "only the receiving end has changed", I'm not seeing anything on my MX servers which are mirroring the behaviour you're seeing. I *am* seeing occasional "??EHLO somename" commands,

[exim-dev] [Bug 2250] Peculiarity with SMTP delivery in Exim 4.90.1

2018-03-08 Thread admin--- via Exim-dev
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2250 --- Comment #4 from David Carter --- > I assume that a bisect isn't viable? It would be awkward. I would be willing to try a couple of subdivisions to try and narrow things down. However I think that I would want to wait a couple of

[exim-dev] [Bug 2250] Peculiarity with SMTP delivery in Exim 4.90.1

2018-03-08 Thread admin--- via Exim-dev
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2250 --- Comment #3 from Jeremy Harris --- Scanning the commit log between 4.89.1 and 4.90.1 isn't flagging anything to me. I assume that a bisect isn't viable? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the

[exim-dev] [Bug 2250] Peculiarity with SMTP delivery in Exim 4.90.1

2018-03-08 Thread admin--- via Exim-dev
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2250 --- Comment #2 from David Carter --- > I can see a steady stream of 'NULL character' error messages > which appear to relate to remote hosts attempting to talk gibberish > (TLS perhaps?) on port 25 Yes, we still see this now that I

[exim-dev] [Bug 2250] Peculiarity with SMTP delivery in Exim 4.90.1

2018-03-08 Thread admin--- via Exim-dev
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2250 Graeme Fowler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gra...@graemef.net ---