[exim-dev] [Bug 2827] bounce generated by exim gets too long lines breaching message_linelength_limit limit
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2827 --- Comment #3 from Jeremy Harris --- Oddly, there's already a limit of 12 ref items in a generated References: - so the above example with 50-char items only make on order of 600. We should also impose a 998-char limit for them, but it's not obviously a fix for that case. Ah - you looked at the -D file, so it was the body not the headers, and bug 1760 should apply. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
[exim-dev] [Bug 2827] bounce generated by exim gets too long lines breaching message_linelength_limit limit
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2827 Jeremy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED --- Comment #4 from Jeremy Harris --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1760 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
[exim-dev] [Bug 2827] bounce generated by exim gets too long lines breaching message_linelength_limit limit
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2827 Arkadiusz Miskiewicz changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.exim.org/show_ ||bug.cgi?id=1684 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
[exim-dev] [Bug 2827] bounce generated by exim gets too long lines breaching message_linelength_limit limit
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2827 Richard Clayton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rich...@highwayman.com --- Comment #2 from Richard Clayton --- Rather than discarding all the references except the last -- which will mess up the threading if some messages are missing, would it not be wiser to follow the NetNews scheme (rfc5537) and avoid discarding the first and the last two (which if they are not outrageously long) should allow space for a new reference. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
[exim-dev] [Bug 2827] bounce generated by exim gets too long lines breaching message_linelength_limit limit
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2827 Jeremy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unalloca...@exim.org|jgh146...@wizmail.org Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Jeremy Harris --- Yup, 1760 only deals with overlength body lines; there's no header handling. We need new facilities for that, either dropping, truncating or trying to meaningfully edit headers. Specifically for References: we could try to drop all but the last ref (which should be the most recent). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
