David Saez Padros via Exim-dev (Fr 20 Dez 2019 08:46:10
CET):
> Hi
>
> i'm a bit confused, exim is using libspf2 like spfquery.libspf2
> does and both return different results, not sure why exim is doing
> dns queries itself to interpret spf, the libspf2 documentation gives
> a very simple
Hi
i'm a bit confused, exim is using libspf2 like spfquery.libspf2
does and both return different results, not sure why exim is doing
dns queries itself to interpret spf, the libspf2 documentation gives
a very simple example while exim's spf.c looks more complex
El 19/12/2019 a las 15:14,
On 19/12/2019 10:54, David Saez Padros via Exim-dev wrote:
> On the new release i get a lot of spf failures that make me have to
> disable spf.
Thanks for the debug info. This looks like a variant of
bug 2499.
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## List details at
Hi
On the new release i get a lot of spf failures that make me have to
disable spf. I tried to debug this spf rejection:
2019-12-19 11:09:33 H=mta-90-197.sparkpostmail.com [192.174.90.197]
Warning: SPF msprvs1=18256LU-Q9YGR=bounces-23293-11...@spmailtechnol.com
mta-90-197.sparkpostmail.com
