Re: [exim-dev] branch exim-4_91+fixes created

2018-04-27 Thread Andreas Metzler via Exim-dev
On 2018-04-23 Jeremy Harris via Exim-dev wrote: > For distro maintainers, and similar, as per Subject > and similar to previous +fixes branches. > Intent is to only carry actual fixes, no new features or > minor fiddling. The master branch remains the main path > of

Re: [exim-dev] tls_sni = $host in default configuration file

2019-01-04 Thread Andreas Metzler via Exim-dev
On 2019-01-04 Florian Zumbiehl via Exim-dev wrote: > On 2019-01-04 Jeremy Harris via Exim-dev wrote: >> On 04/01/2019 01:02, Florian Zumbiehl via Exim-dev wrote: >>> may I suggest you put that on the >>> website somewhere? >> It was already there, at https://bugs.exim.org/enter_bug.cgi > That

Re: [exim-dev] tls_sni = $host in default configuration file

2018-12-17 Thread Andreas Metzler via Exim-dev
On 2018-12-17 Phil Pennock via Exim-dev wrote: > On 2018-12-16 at 10:42 +, Jeremy Harris via Exim-dev wrote: > > On 16/12/2018 10:20, Andreas Metzler via Exim-dev wrote: > > > 4.92rc1 adds this to the smarthost_smtp transport: > > > > > > tls_sni

[exim-dev] Tests with TLS 1.3?

2018-12-24 Thread Andreas Metzler via Exim-dev
Hello, did anybody yet test exim with TLS 1.3? Server side (exim/GnuTLS accepting messages from swaks or mutt) seems to work (see header), however I have yet to find a public SMTP server who offers TLS 1.3, to test outgoing deliveries. cu Andreas -- `What a good friend you are to him, Dr.

[exim-dev] tls_sni = $host in default configuration file

2018-12-16 Thread Andreas Metzler via Exim-dev
Hello, 4.92rc1 adds this to the smarthost_smtp transport: tls_sni = $host I do not think that always works as expected. Depending on the DNS setup (CNAME, round robin) $host will not contain the name of the selected smarthost anymore but a different value. cu Andreas -- `What a good friend

[exim-dev] Hard to understand doc enhancement 52af44332434a2a34ae30f3d0ac3b549d512e4cc

2019-03-09 Thread Andreas Metzler via Exim-dev
Hello, 52af44332434a2a34ae30f3d0ac3b549d512e4cc and the latest commit on 4.92 fixes adds this change to spec: +&*Warning 3*&: Do not use an IPv4-mapped IPv6 address for a key; use the +IPv4. Such addresses being searched for are converted to IPv4. I had to read thrice to understand, perhaps a

Re: [exim-dev] Hard to understand doc enhancement 52af44332434a2a34ae30f3d0ac3b549d512e4cc

2019-03-11 Thread Andreas Metzler via Exim-dev
On 2019-03-11 Heiko Schlittermann via Exim-dev wrote: > Andreas Metzler via Exim-dev (Sa 09 Mär 2019 17:49:28 > CET): [...] >> +&*Warning 3*&: Do not use an IPv4-mapped IPv6 address for a key; use the >> +IPv4. Such addresses being searched for are converted to