[exim-dev] [Bug 2239] segfault when processing control = utf8_downconvert

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2239 Jeremy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added See Also|

[exim-dev] [Bug 2239] segfault when processing control = utf8_downconvert

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2239 --- Comment #5 from Jeremy Harris --- Nobody commented on the fix. Opened wishlist item 2246 for the transport option suggestion. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- ## List details at

[exim-dev] [Bug 2239] segfault when processing control = utf8_downconvert

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2239 Jeremy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED

[exim-dev] [Bug 2239] segfault when processing control = utf8_downconvert

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2239 Git Commit changed: What|Removed |Added CC||g...@exim.org --- Comment #4 from

[exim-dev] [Bug 2239] segfault when processing control = utf8_downconvert

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2239 --- Comment #3 from Gedalya --- Yes. The documentation could be read as suggesting the flag is stored with the message, not with a recipient address item. Coming to think of it, it would fit better in many configurations if this

[exim-dev] [Bug 2239] segfault when processing control = utf8_downconvert

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2239 Jeremy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2

[exim-dev] [Bug 2239] segfault when processing control = utf8_downconvert

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2239 --- Comment #1 from Gedalya --- Sorry, correction. It does work when called from acl_smtp_rcpt. Looks like the acl_check() function in acl.c leaves addr as NULL unless (where==ACL_WHERE_RCPT || where==ACL_WHERE_VRFY ||