What you know about PRDR?
вт, 15 янв. 2019 г. в 8:17, Claus Assmann via Exim-dev :
> On Sun, Jan 13, 2019, �懈谢�薪 �邪谢邪�蟹芯胁 via Exim-dev wrote:
>
> > nor I see in the archives my second message about Meta1.
>
> I got it at least twice...
>
> > please enable in Meta1 PRDR by default (e.g. when
On Sun, Jan 13, 2019, ?? via Exim-dev wrote:
> nor I see in the archives my second message about Meta1.
I got it at least twice...
> please enable in Meta1 PRDR by default (e.g. when Meta1 acts as client), for
> the reasons described at
>
On 13/01/2019 10:06, Дилян Палаузов via Exim-dev wrote:
> Anyway, implementing Sieve’s ereject will make it very easy to do rejecting
> per recipient without explicit ACLs. Just
> let the user upload Sieve.
I suggest you try that before implying it will interwork with PRDR.
I don't think it
To: meta1+feedb...@meta1.org,
CC: exim-dev@exim.org, Andrew C Aitchison ,
Hello,
please enable in Meta1 PRDR by default (e.g. when Meta1 acts as client), for
the reasons described at
https://lists.exim.org/lurker/message/20190111.221619.049721de.en.html (and
below).
Currently
Hello,
I subscribed to exim-dev, but somehow I have not received this message
https://lists.exim.org/lurker/message/20190112.210337.b527c995.en.html
nor I see in the archives my second message about Meta1.
Anyway, implementing Sieve’s ereject will make it very easy to do rejecting per
On 11/01/2019 09:59, Дилян Палаузов via Exim-dev wrote:
> To make progress with PRDR please switch the default for enable_prdr to True.
Although doing so would be safe (a missing prdr ACL is defaulted to
"accept"), it would be pointless from the point of view of the receiving
end and somewhat
On Fri, 11 Jan 2019, ? via Exim-dev wrote:
Hello,
the last discussion about PRDR
http://www.eric-a-hall.com/specs/draft-hall-prdr-00.txt on ietf-s...@ietf.org
was in
March 2014.
https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-smtp/current/msg07655.html
The question was if PRDR will
Hello,
the last discussion about PRDR
http://www.eric-a-hall.com/specs/draft-hall-prdr-00.txt on ietf-s...@ietf.org
was in
March 2014.
https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-smtp/current/msg07655.html
The question was if PRDR will make any progress. One of the answers was that
nobody
