Hi,
I'm wondering why i have no headers from SA in email relayed through
router relay? Emails, marked as spam and delivered to local dir, have
headers X-Spam_ . Does driver smtp make changes in headers?
My exim conf looks like this:
acl_check_data:
[...]
warn
spam=nobody
add_header =
--On 7 April 2010 16:24:45 +0100 John Robinson
john.robin...@anonymous.org.uk wrote:
I would have RTFM looking for a fix to it, but as it was missing I
thought 'I'll ask those helpful people on the list, I'm sure they won't
do the postfix thing and flame me for the question'
You
I'm trying to create a filter that rejects messages sent outbound to a
specific address. I have something close, but I'm getting an odd error
message sometimes.
Error: R=noreply_redirect defer (-17): error in filter
data: unrecognized condition word 'Steven near line 2 of filter file
I'm
[resend, correct sender this time, text written yesterday]
While I can't gather stats on which scanners are deployed at Exim
installs, I think it reasonable to assume that *many* installs make use
of ClamAV.
The developers today sent a reminder to the clamav-announce
mailing-list [†], stating:
Phil Pennock wrote:
[resend, correct sender this time, text written yesterday]
While I can't gather stats on which scanners are deployed at Exim
installs, I think it reasonable to assume that *many* installs make use
of ClamAV.
The developers today sent a reminder to the clamav-announce
Steven Nikkel wrote:
I'm trying to create a filter that rejects messages sent outbound to a
specific address. I have something close, but I'm getting an odd error
message sometimes.
Error: R=noreply_redirect defer (-17): error in filter
data: unrecognized condition word 'Steven near
On Thu, 8 Apr 2010, W B Hacker wrote:
Well - presuming your only obfuscation is the dratted 'xyz.com' then just what
*IS* (verbatim, if you please) in the 'header in this case'?
From your error message and what you've said about it, one suspects it might
have more than the one 'nore...@...'
Thank you for that considerate and useful advisory!
I 2nd that thank you. If I were to subscribe to the mailing lists of every
piece of software I use, I'd never get any work done! Thankfully the subject
line of this thread caught my eye, and sure enough - I have a server to upgrade
:P
On 2010-04-08 at 22:36 -0400, e.sand+exim-us...@elisand.com wrote:
If I were to subscribe to the mailing lists of every piece of software I use,
I'd never get any work done!
Discussion lists, certainly. But I do encourage you to consider the
benefits of -announce lists, especially those
