On 2012-02-19 at 15:06 +0100, Moritz Wilhelmy wrote:
I've installed mailman in a FreeBSD-jail(8) (much like chroot(8)-jails,
but can't be left that easily via fchdir etc.), and now I have the
problem that I can't reach mailman (version 2, version 3 would have
LMTP, which would eliminate the
On 2012-02-20 at 03:13 -0500, Phil Pennock wrote:
As long as you're not doing so, try the patch (that's both below and
attached). I don't currently have any Jails setup, so can't actually
*test* it, but it does compile. *cough* On FreeBSD 7, and there may
have been incompatible changes in
On 19 Feb 2012, at 15:08, Muhammad Irfan wrote:
Same scenario will work from US exim server. Hoping i explained my
requirements well enough.
Yes, the requirements are clear.
Can someone please point to achieve this through examples,docs etc.
That depends on how you do your final
W dniu 19.01.2012 22:34, Marcin Mirosław pisze:
W dniu 2012-01-19 21:49, Phil Pennock napisał(a):
If you have a copy of such an email which you're willing to share, then
could you please forward it, WITH ALL HEADERS INTACT, to me and I'll
try to find time to take a look.
I sended such mail
. In this case, the best method would be a simple lookup on a local
database (perhaps a replicated LDAP server) to decide which mailstore to
deliver to. That would allow you to have identical configurations on each
smtp server.
I don't have any knowledge of Cyrus, so not using it. Can you please
FYI, I'm seeing a number of timeouts from a mail provider called
redcondor.net and sure enough, when I telnet to port 25:
220 smtp450.redcondor.net ESMTP EdgeWave mag4000e
LOL... http://redcondor.com/ -- owned by EdgeWave.
I guess the question is... is it something EdgeWave is doing, or is
I opened a ticket with EdgeWave, to see if they were aware of any
particular problems talking to Exim. Their response was this:
Per RFC 2821, If your mail server is issuing a 250 response at the end of
the smtp session then that means that the message was successfully
delivered. (as far as the
