Re: [exim] ARC: no t= field added

2018-04-17 Thread Jeremy Harris via Exim-users
On 17/04/18 21:28, Max Kostikov via Exim-users wrote: > I'm playing now with new experimental ARC module and found that signing > option "timestamps" doesn't applies and as result t= field in ARC > signatures is absent. > Seems about the same tells Google: > > Authentication-Results:

[exim] ARC: no t= field added

2018-04-17 Thread Max Kostikov via Exim-users
Hello! I'm playing now with new experimental ARC module and found that signing option "timestamps" doesn't applies and as result t= field in ARC signatures is absent. Seems about the same tells Google: Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@yandex.ru header.s=mail

Re: [exim] ACL verb "reject" - An error in the Specification?

2018-04-17 Thread Heiko Schlittermann via Exim-users
Mike Brudenell via Exim-users (Di 17 Apr 2018 20:47:32 CEST): > Am I going mad? > > Section 43.36 *Detailed information from merged DNS lists* > > in > the Specification

[exim] ACL verb "reject" - An error in the Specification?

2018-04-17 Thread Mike Brudenell via Exim-users
Am I going mad? Section 43.36 *Detailed information from merged DNS lists* in the Specification has two examples, such as: reject message = \ rejected because $sender_host_address is

Re: [exim] compiling 4.91 under FreeBSD

2018-04-17 Thread Vsevolod Stakhov via Exim-users
On 16.04.2018 21:00, Phil Pennock wrote: > On 2018-04-16 at 12:14 -0500, Larry Rosenman via Exim-users wrote: >> http://home.lerctr.org:/data/live-host-ports/2018-04-16_11h54m01s/logs/errors/exim-4.91.log > > Enable OCSP support. It's on by default in Exim and our test suite > isn't good at