On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 03:56:55PM +0100, Klaus Ethgen via Exim-users wrote:
> > I suppose your Exim is also linked to GnuTLS?
>
> Sure, it is the common debian version and Debian is always linking
> against gnutls.
You can rebuild the source deb against OpenSSL:
https://wiki.debian.org/PkgEx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi Folks,
Am Mi den 5. Sep 2018 um 14:41 schrieb Michael Westerburg via Exim-users:
> On 09/05/2018 01:00 PM, exim-users-requ...@exim.org wrote:
> > After I enabled (themporarily) the random CA they use, I got a
> > successfull delivery with the lo
Hello Klaus,
On 09/05/2018 01:00 PM, exim-users-requ...@exim.org wrote:
> After I enabled (themporarily) the random CA they use, I got a
> successfull delivery with the log file saying that it was validated via
> DANE.
thank you very much for sharing your observation.
I suppose your Exim is also
Hello Viktor,
On 09/05/2018 01:00 PM, exim-users-requ...@exim.org wrote:
> My advice to the user would be to use a version of Exim that
> is linked with OpenSSL and NOT GnuTLS. The Exim DANE support
> in combination with GnuTLS is not nearly as well tested or
> supported.
thank you very much for
> On Sep 5, 2018, at 1:56 AM, Klaus Ethgen via Exim-users
> wrote:
>
> I had the same problem some days ago.
>
> I do not trust any CA, so no CA is in my truststore. However, some days
> ago, I posted to lists.gentoo.org. They have a valid TLSA entry but exim
> told me that it can't be valid
