On 2019-06-26 at 10:42 -, Jasen Betts via Exim-users wrote:
> alternatively in ACL_AUTH
>
> drop
> set acl_c_auth_count = ${eval: $acl_c_auth_count + 1}
> condition = ${if >{1}{$acl_c_auth_count }}
> message = "go away"
>
> which will allow only one attempt at auth per connect.
Sorry I mustn’t have made myself clear OR I don’t understand your answer…
The issue is that I have spam messages going to the INBOX not the Spam Folder..
ie: it is not matching this router..
The message scores 10 and is clearly spam, but I don’t understand what to
change to make a message with
Viktor Dukhovni via Exim-users wrote:
>> On Jun 27, 2019, at 5:58 AM, Richard Jones via Exim-users
>> wrote:
>> There have been a few mails about this recently, but I don't think they
>> cover my case (nor is this about my previous mail about retry times)
> There was a recent thread that's an
On 28/06/2019 17:09, Jonathan Gilpin via Exim-users wrote:
> MYSQL_Q_WHITELIST=SELECT DISTINCT MYSQL_WHITETABLE.address FROM
> MYSQL_WHITETABLE WHERE ('${quote_mysql:$sender_address}' LIKE
> whitelist.address) OR ('*@${quote_mysql:$sender_address_domain}' LIKE
> whitelist.address)
>
>
>> On
Appologies:
MYSQL_Q_WHITELIST=SELECT DISTINCT MYSQL_WHITETABLE.address FROM
MYSQL_WHITETABLE WHERE ('${quote_mysql:$sender_address}' LIKE
whitelist.address) OR ('*@${quote_mysql:$sender_address_domain}' LIKE
whitelist.address)
> On 28 Jun 2019, at 16:50, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users
>
On 28/06/2019 16:23, Jonathan Gilpin via Exim-users wrote:
> senders = ! ${lookup mysql {MYSQL_Q_WHITELIST}{$value}}
^
Missing information.
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim
Hi,
I have a router as follows:
virtual_local_spamw:
driver = accept
condition = "${if eq{$h_X-Spam-Flag:}{YES} {1}{0}}"
senders = ! ${lookup mysql {MYSQL_Q_WHITELIST}{$value}}
domains = ${lookup mysql {MYSQL_Q_LOCSPAW}{$value}}
transport = virtual_local_spamw_delivery
The problem
On 28/06/2019 15:50, Richard Jones via Exim-users wrote:
> Is this the expected behaviour?
If you're wanting to affect the behaviour of Exim sending messages,
yes, the relevant configuration goes on the transport.
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## List details at
On Jun 28, Antoine via Exim-users wrote
> -VERS-TLS1.3
Thanks Antoine, but that doesn't seem to work:
$ gnutls-cli -l --priority SECURE256:-VERS-TLS1.3
Cipher suites for SECURE256:-VERS-TLS1.3
TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 0xc0, 0x2c TLS1.2
On 28/06/2019 14:50, Richard Jones via Exim-users wrote:
> Thanks Viktor, and also for your other response. I don't suppose you
> know the magic priority string to stop this? I've had a read through the
> gnutls pages on the subject, but it's not obvious how to disable TLSv1.3
> ("!VERS-TLS1.3"
On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 02:50:25PM +0100, Richard Jones via Exim-users wrote:
> On Jun 27, Viktor Dukhovni via Exim-users wrote
> > Which is exactly this. IIRC there's a recent Exim patch, or you
> > can disable TLS 1.3, or switch to Exim built with OpenSSL.
>
> Thanks Viktor, and also for your
On 28/06/2019 15:50, Richard Jones via Exim-users wrote:
> On Jun 27, Viktor Dukhovni via Exim-users wrote
>> Which is exactly this. IIRC there's a recent Exim patch, or you
>> can disable TLS 1.3, or switch to Exim built with OpenSSL.
> Thanks Viktor, and also for your other response. I don't
On Jun 27, Viktor Dukhovni via Exim-users wrote
> Which is exactly this. IIRC there's a recent Exim patch, or you
> can disable TLS 1.3, or switch to Exim built with OpenSSL.
Thanks Viktor, and also for your other response. I don't suppose you
know the magic priority string to stop this? I've
On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 04:44:33PM +0100, Richard Jones via Exim-users wrote:
> On Jun 27, Niels Dettenbach wrote
> > Relaying to GMail from "unknown third party" SMTP servers could be very
> > limited / "downslowed" by different "temp avail" strategies. Google offers
> > a
> > "postmaster
On Fri, 28 Jun 2019, Sujit Acharyya-Choudhury via Exim-users wrote:
Is there a safe way to rewrite From field for ALL incoming messages?
Sadly there is not.
Or at least there is no way to determine *for all messages*
what would be a safe string to use as the replacement.
Each message can
On Jun 27, Niels Dettenbach wrote
> Relaying to GMail from "unknown third party" SMTP servers could be very
> limited / "downslowed" by different "temp avail" strategies. Google offers a
> "postmaster tool" which seem to shift reputation of "registered" SMTP
> Servers:
>
Hello Exim Users.
I've been using Exim4 on my workstation for sometime .
I discover a problem in Exim4's handing of server certificates verification,
when the smtp smarthosts' hostnames are DNS aliases Exim4 always can't
pass verification and
log with something like "certificate/cert name
Is there a safe way to rewrite From field for ALL incoming messages? We are
having problems with Phishing where recipients only see the From field and
assume it has come from a trusted person and then click on the link or
download the file.
An example is as follows:
18 matches
Mail list logo
