Quoting Jeremy Harris via Exim-users (exim-users@exim.org):
> > I find that the header is added to -all- messages while i'd expect
> > the 'recipients'-condition to prevent that. When the add_header and
> > recipients line are swapped it does works as i'd expect.
> > Is that behaviour ...
On 22/01/2020 15:02, Sander Smeenk via Exim-users wrote:
> warn
> add_header = X-SomeHeader: somevalue
> recipients = somere...@somedomain.example.tld
> control = dkim_disable_verify
>
> I find that the header is added to -all- messages while i'd expect
> the
On 22 Jan 2020, at 15:02, Sander Smeenk via Exim-users
wrote:
> Is that behaviour ... expected? ;)
Yes:
https://www.exim.org/exim-html-current/doc/html/spec_html/ch-access_control_lists.html
Sec 24:
"The add_header modifier acts immediately as it is encountered during the
processing of an
Hi list,
Given this statement in acl_check_rcpt:
warn
add_header = X-SomeHeader: somevalue
recipients = somere...@somedomain.example.tld
control = dkim_disable_verify
I find that the header is added to -all- messages while i'd expect
the 'recipients'-condition to
On 22 Jan 2020, at 09:51, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users
wrote:
> That part in also interesting to me, as I get too little feedback
> from production users. I'd really like to get a debug-output sample
> from that startup phase.
I’ll send you a link to one separately.
In short: generated a
On 22/01/2020 00:15, Maeldron T. via Exim-users wrote:
> 1. When I tried to run the queue worker with the -qq option, it didn’t
> start sending the emails for maybe fifteen minutes. There was not much disk
> activity by exim (I checked it with top -m io -o total). I have no idea
> what it was
On 22/01/2020 01:19, Viktor Dukhovni via Exim-users wrote:
> [ I hope it is not out of line to mention a related Postfix capability
> on this list when a user appears to be looking for something to meet
> a need that does to appear to be directly supported by Exim, apologies
> otherwise... ]
