On 24/12/2020 23:30, Yves Goergen via Exim-users wrote:
Well, if that log was intended for humans, would it be an interesting idea to write a machine-readable log as well?
See bugs 2142 and 2610. So far, not enough actual interest to
get anyone to put the effort into the developement and
Thanks for the links. That makes me more confident that I can restrict
parsing on that format. The regex you referenced is exactly what I have
thought of. So that's good. :-)
-Yves
Ursprüngliche Nachricht
Von: Graeme Fowler via Exim-users
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 24. Dezember
On 24/12/2020 22:17, Yves Goergen via Exim-users wrote:
I'm parsing Exim log files, specifically the mainlog. Man, that's a complex
structure and it's hard to find all necessary details from the documentation
and by reading my actual log files. I'm using several regular expressions for
On 24 Dec 2020, at 22:17, Yves Goergen via Exim-users
wrote:
> What assumptions can I make about the format of a queue message ID? For now,
> I use this regex:
https://www.exim.org/exim-html-current/doc/html/spec_html/ch-how_exim_receives_and_delivers_mail.html#SECTmessiden
You may
Hello,
I'm parsing Exim log files, specifically the mainlog. Man, that's a
complex structure and it's hard to find all necessary details from the
documentation and by reading my actual log files. I'm using several
regular expressions for different kinds of lines. But a stateful parser
(the
On 23/12/2020 22:05, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users wrote:
On 21/12/2020 12:50, Bart Noordervliet via Exim-users wrote:
Taint mismatch, string_nextinlist: expand_getlistele 1309
The fix will be available in the next few days.
Commit 942f0be6c2.
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## List details at
I'm having many confusions while setting up exim. I use Parabola GNU OS (Arch)
I'm executing
exim -bt -d-resolver anonym...@designman.org
I get
DNS lookup of designman.org(MX) gave TRY_AGAIN
but "dig @8.8.8.8 designman.org MX" shows a record
designman.org. 3599 IN MX
DSN (Delivery Status Notification) is another name for the bounches. Basically,
if the remote delivery fails, DONT send a bounce back to the sender.
Same domain = the domain the server is authorative for.
Basically, IF sender == "" and receiver != "*@yourdomain.com" then redirect to
Do I have a DSN at all? Exim is doing the second delivery (forward)
itself and fails itself, it is not sent a bounce back that it needs to
forward.
Also, what is "the same domain"?
-Yves
Ursprüngliche Nachricht
Von: Sebastian Nielsen via Exim-users
Gesendet: Donnerstag,
Simple solution is to configure the server to not send any DSNs for forwards
at all.
Since DSNs do have a blank sender, a trick is to have a router which detects
a blank sender, and if receiver of the bounce isn't someone on the same
domain, then blackholes it. (use :blackhole: as redirect data)
10 matches
Mail list logo