Re: [exim] documentation corrections

2021-03-06 Thread Heiko Schlittermann via Exim-users
Jim Pazarena via Exim-users (Do 18 Feb 2021 16:55:46 CET): > what is the proper procedure to report spelling mistakes in the > documentation ? This is the right way. Thank you for spotting the typos. > In reading thru various pages I have found two mis-spelled words . > chapter 37. " The

Re: [exim] Pipelining QUIT after data

2021-03-06 Thread Jeremy Harris via Exim-users
On 06/03/2021 22:36, Viktor Dukhovni via Exim-users wrote: Postfix does not bother with client-side BDAT, because SIZE=... is sent as part of MAIL, and so the main reason for sending chunks (avoiding large transmission of content which the remote server will not accept) is rarely applicable.

Re: [exim] Pipelining QUIT after data

2021-03-06 Thread Viktor Dukhovni via Exim-users
> On Mar 6, 2021, at 12:03 PM, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users > wrote: > > I do find, when implementing it, that both Outlook and Google screw up, > as server, when Exim does it. In both cases, CHUNKING had also been used. > I wonder if anyone else has observed this? Good question, Postfix

Re: [exim] Pipelining QUIT after data

2021-03-06 Thread Jeremy Harris via Exim-users
On 06/03/2021 14:03, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users wrote: both Outlook and Google screw up, as server Correction: both yahoodns.net and google.com . -- Cheers, Jeremy -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please

[exim] Pipelining QUIT after data

2021-03-06 Thread Jeremy Harris via Exim-users
On 27/02/2021 22:27, Viktor Dukhovni via Exim-users wrote: If this is indeed a connection closed after message delivery, there are a few possibilities. 1. ESMTP PIPELINING was not used to pipeline "DOT" and "QUIT", the server sends QUIT separately, but does not wait for a