Hi,
John Smith (Mi 14 Jun 2017 07:41:03 CEST):
>Hello Heiko,
>
>When I used exim-gencert, I set the FQDN name of the Exim server in the
>field "Server name (eg. ssl.domain.tld; required!!!) [])". So here I
>think it's good.
I do not known exim-gencert, but
John Smith (Mi 14 Jun 2017 01:08:15 CEST):
>Hello,
>
>After some questions about the config files with a Debian system, I
>continued playing with Exim and the TLS!
>I think it's on the good way because now I get "STARTTLS" from telnet
>and get some
Jan Ingvoldstad via Exim-users (Di 13 Jun 2017 22:20:07
CEST):
…
>
> It essentially saves you from performing this dance for every configuration
> change:
>
> 1) exim -bV -C new-exim4.conf
> 2) mv new-exim4.conf exim4.conf
>
> Granted, as long as you don't reload the exim
Heiko Schlittermann via Exim-users <exim-users@exim.org> (Mi 07 Jun 2017
21:47:28 CEST):
> Hi Klaus,
I found it and will prepare a patch later.
Best regards from Dresden/Germany
Viele Grüße aus Dresden
Heiko Schlittermann
--
SCHLITTERMANN.de
Hi Klaus,
does the problem still persist?
- Which Exim version?
- Distro package or self compiled?
I'm trying to reproduce it on my system.
Ideally you can provide me a complete message that caused the log file
corruptionr.
Best regards from Dresden/Germany
Viele Grüße aus
Jerry Stuckle (Mi 07 Jun 2017 03:55:40 CEST):
> Hi, all,
>
> I'm kinda lost here. I have a perl script (call it xyz.pl) I need to
> call from ACL processing (SPAM handling). The script returns the number
> of days since the sending domain was registered or -1 if it
Klaus Ethgen (Do 01 Jun 2017 07:37:16 CEST):
>
> But sometimes, it looks like the following (note the line break in the
> middle):
>|2017-05-30 11:22:38 1dFdMM-0001w2-Jo DKIM: d=powermtapro.com
> s=1494427074.powermtapro c=relaxed/relaxed a=rsa-sha1 b=1024
Joseph Kezar (Mo 22 Mai 2017 17:50:32 CEST):
> Heiko + Exim Users,
> Thank you for providing that link. I have consulted that link prior to
> my composing my original email to the exim-users group. I in fact am the
> one who wrote this retry rule based on that exim
Joseph Kezar via Exim-users (Mo 22 Mai 2017 16:21:22
CEST):
> Can someone please explain what this retry rules does?
>
> vermont.gov * F,1h,1m; F,4h,30m; F,5d,1h
http://www.exim.org/exim-html-current/doc/html/spec_html/ch-retry_configuration.html
Best regards
Jeremy Harris (Do 18 Mai 2017 14:51:39 CEST):
> On 10/05/17 08:26, Fraenzl, Martin via Exim-users wrote:
> > We have a Cisco ESA upstream gateway and having exim panics with mails
> > which get resent successfully later on.
> > Do you have any idea how to fix the problem or
Hi Victor,
forget my two other mails.
Victor Ustugov (Mo 08 Mai 2017 18:37:56 CEST):
…
> # exim -be '${lookup dnsdb{defer_never,txt=d201702._domainkey.exim.org}}'
> v=DKIM1; k=rsa;
>
Heiko Schlittermann (Mo 08 Mai 2017 22:36:50 CEST):
> Victor Ustugov (Mo 08 Mai 2017 18:37:56 CEST):
> …
> > Other examples:
> >
> > # exim -be '${lookup dnsdb{defer_never,txt=d201702._domainkey.exim.org}}'
> > v=DKIM1; k=rsa;
> >
Victor Ustugov (Mo 08 Mai 2017 18:37:56 CEST):
…
> Other examples:
>
> # exim -be '${lookup dnsdb{defer_never,txt=d201702._domainkey.exim.org}}'
> v=DKIM1; k=rsa;
>
Gary Stainburn (Di 02 Mai 2017 11:10:58 CEST):
> I'm running a Centos 7 system and I have just done a 'yum update' for the
…
> The offending code was in acl_check_data and was:
>
> # GPS added 2014-04-30
> warn message = X-MIME-Error: $demime_reason
>
Hello,
Osman ÇAKMAR via Exim-users (Mi 26 Apr 2017 21:41:56
CEST):
> On 2017-04-26 12:51, Jeremy Harris wrote:
>
> > On 26/04/17 08:08, Osman ÇAKMAR via Exim-users wrote:
> > > This causes our gateway to reject the mails.
> >
> > > Can you guide us how we can solve this
Hi Dennis,
Be warned: header rewriting may be like opening pandoras box, especially
if the messages you massage are already DKIM signed.
Dennis Weber (Sa 22 Apr 2017 23:01:26 CEST):
> Hi Community,
>
> I am currently working on a project for a transparent Rewrite
Hi,
Ajay Kajla via Exim-users (Mo 24 Apr 2017 13:30:58 CEST):
> Hi,
>
> Yes, I am sending mail from aja...@example.com to cc: ajayka...@yahoo.com
> and bcc: ajayka...@gmail.com after applying following filter. But both
> mails are going through.
>
> ~~~
> if
Matthew Ceroni via Exim-users (Fr 21 Apr 2017 20:36:50
CEST):
> I am attempting to do the following (simplified example)
>
> domainlist local_domains = @ : ${run{echo "test.com"}}
…
Use the full path name to your command, "/bin/echo" in your case.
And read carefully about
Фадеев Виталий Львович via Exim-users (Mi 19 Apr 2017
10:04:28 CEST):
…
> accept
> dkim_status = pass
> logwrite = DKIM test passed
> add_header = X-DKIM-Status: DKIM pass: (address=$sender_address
> domain=$dkim_cur_signer), signature
Stefan Unterweger <28443.kr@8j1.enskribi.email> (Di 18 Apr 2017 20:07:33 CEST):
> I want to scrub certain kinds of headers for all incoming messages so
…
> I have tried to find some kind of string expansion which would give me a
> list of all message headers which start with my chosen prefix, or
Hi,
Usama Tariq (Sa 18 Mär 2017 07:28:08 CET):
> Dear Concern,
> The thing i want is to block outgoing-email(means outside from domainone.com)
> of specific user and send the copy of outgoing email to
> monitor...@domainone.com.
What is "specific user"? Are you talking about
Chris Siebenmann (Fr 07 Apr 2017 17:16:34 CEST):
> > how does verify = sender work. I can't find anything that says what
> > it does exactly in the docs. I'm seeing a valid sender get rejected
> > several times before being finally accepted.
>
> As Jeremy Harris covered,
Alvaro Lacerda (Mi 05 Apr 2017 18:16:55 CEST):
> Hi Heiko,
>
> Thanks for the info and help. I installed exim from the yum command from a
> Centos 7.3.1611 machine.
>
> I talked to one of my coworkers and figured out that I was missing the sql
> plugin for exim, so that's
Tech Gurus via Exim-users (Di 04 Apr 2017 16:15:29 CEST):
> What is the best way to handle it at the door? . If sender is sending to
> list of recipients and one of them is not valid email .
You should check the recipient at SMTP time in your ACL (hint: verify =
recipient in
Hi,
Alvaro Lacerda (Mo 03 Apr 2017 16:02:31 CEST):
> Hi All,
>
> When I try to see if an email can be reached through the command 'exim -bt
> "f...@example.com" ' I keep getting an error saying: "f...@example.com cannot
> be resolved at this time: Temporary internal
Jeremy,
Jeremy Harris (So 02 Apr 2017 13:01:32 CEST):
…
> >>> will write message using CHUNKING
> >>> SMTP>> BDAT 10858271 LAST
> >>> LOG: MAIN
> >>> SSL_write: (from mout.kundenserver.de [212.227.17.24]:58868) syscall:
> >>> Broken pipe
> >>> SMTP(close)>>
> >>
> >> Does
Viktor Dukhovni (Do 30 Mär 2017 16:52:38 CEST):
…
> I don't know whether Exim needs to be restarted to change
> certificates, or picks up new certs automatically as clients
> connect. I suspect the latter, with the TLS context
> created and destroyed per connection.
Hello Nicola,
Nicola Tiling (Do 23 Mär 2017 01:27:35 CET):
> Hi
>
> We have problems with chunking since Version 4.89 (not 4.88). Mails to an
> exchange server hang, 11MB data don’t come to an end and after ~8 min. the
> transfer stops.
>
Did you receive the message via a
Hi,
Nicola Tiling (Do 23 Mär 2017 01:27:35 CET):
> Hi
>
> We have problems with chunking since Version 4.89 (not 4.88). Mails to an
> exchange server hang, 11MB data don’t come to an end and after ~8 min. the
> transfer stops.
>
Did you receive the message via a chunked
Phillip Carroll (Do 23 Mär 2017 17:31:55
CET):
…
> As to logwrite: The authors of exim's linguistic constructions are clearly
> Emerson devotees...
> ("A foolish consistency...")
Consistency is for the little minds? :)
ACL |Routers/Transports
Phillip Carroll (Do 23 Mär 2017 01:39:04
CET):
> Hi all,
>
> My intent is to employ a whitelist of trusted host IPs.
>
> I am trying to employ an example straight from the current (4.89) exim
> manual, without success.
>
> The specific example that seems to
501 - 531 of 531 matches
Mail list logo