On 21/01/2022 09:43, Cyborg via Exim-users wrote:
It shows the "hostname" used as "[0.0.0.0]"
It's the HELO name. Documented in the logging chapter
of the docs. The thing in the (parentheses) is
the HELO supplied by the remote client.
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## List details at
On 21/01/2022 09:35, Cyborg via Exim-users wrote:
if exim "changed" to a new db format, shouldn't exim detect an handle this
internally?
Exim did not.
We don't account for what the system might have done to the shared library being
used.
However, I only mentioned it as one possibility.
On 20/01/2022 18:45, Pete Long via Exim-users wrote:
failed to open DB file /var/spool/exim/db/wait-remote_smtp: Inappropriate file
type or format
You have a corrupt DB file, or one not matching the version of DBM linbrary
you are (now?) running with.
Stop the daemon and wait for all exim
On 19/01/2022 09:05, Brian Wiborg via Exim-users wrote:
* Exim disregards the headers and pipes the mail back to our script
Run your daemon with -d+expand and feed one in. Grab the stderr to file; there
will be lots (especially given the need to kill the loop!). Find the rtouer
conditions
On 18/01/2022 15:24, Odhiambo Washington via Exim-users wrote:
he OP would rather mess up with the retry
times
To be fair, that's the quickest way to ensure that Exim doesn't
freeze or bounce a message waiting in spool, which is needed
whatever the eventual delivery method is.
--
Cheers,
On 17/01/2022 22:56, Leonardo Boselli via Exim-users wrote:
What i want to do is that when sending a message to p.example.com whatever
thing happens (no route to host/ dns error / no response / closed port / 4xx or
5xx error), anything different than an accepted message, the message remains in
On 12/01/2022 15:02, Dmitriy Matrosov via Exim-users wrote:
Is it possible to re-route certain mails on the primary server (with lowest MX
priority)
to the secondary (the one with highest priority)?
My use case is if the recipient is not found on the primary server,
try to deliver a message to
On 11/01/2022 13:23, Mikhail Golub via Exim-users wrote:
Seems to have helped.
Thanks for testing; I'll commit that change.
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this
On 11/01/2022 09:08, Mikhail Golub via Exim-users wrote:
Exim version 4.95 #1 (FreeBSD 12.3) built 11-Jan-2022 08:36:14
Do you build from source? If so, please try the attached patch.
--
Cheers,
Jeremydiff --git a/src/src/tls.c b/src/src/tls.c
index d5d11bcea..e6b1bf7a7 100644
---
On 11/01/2022 10:27, Evgeniy Berdnikov via Exim-users wrote:
Mikhail wrote about 2754 leaked handles for root (/) since Exim build time
(11-Jan-2022 08:36:14) until report. Assuming that build and report
timezones are identical, it gives approximately 1 handle in 3 seconds.
Hmmm. With
On 11/01/2022 09:08, Mikhail Golub via Exim-users wrote:
Exim 4.95 running on FreeBSD 12.3
Growing gradually kern.openfiles
# exim -bV
Exim version 4.95 #1 (FreeBSD 12.3) built 11-Jan-2022 08:36:14
8418 - pid of exim main process.
# ps ax | grep exim
8418 - Ss 2:49,48
On 09/01/2022 23:25, Slawomir Dworaczek via Exim-users wrote:
not this way, -BEGIN RSA PRIVATE KEY- there was never a space my
typing error
In that case, you're probably not using the file you think you are.
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## List details at
On 09/01/2022 23:04, Slawomir Dworaczek via Exim-users wrote:
signing_init: privkey PEM-block import: error:0909006C:PEM routines:get_name:no
start line
DKIM: signing failed: PRIVKEY
Start privkey key line is
-BEGIN RSA PRIVATE KEY -
My sample file has
-BEGIN RSA PRIVATE
On 09/01/2022 17:46, Richard Kettlewell via Exim-users wrote:
Can anyone explain why Exim uses an abstract socket address on Linux for
notifier_socket?
Because we don't have to take care to delete it.
It has some rather strange effects, because abstract sockets belong to the
network
On 08/01/2022 18:30, Edwin Balani via Exim-users wrote:
Can't you rely on OPENDMARC_LIB_VERSION? It's defined in dmarc.h:
Quite possibly. Now, is the changed API documented? Or are we
supposed to inspect the libdmarc code and watch for API-breaking
changes, evermore? And *guess* from the
On 08/01/2022 16:31, Slavko (tblt) via Exim-users wrote:
new version of DMARC lib, which fails
to build with exim
The dmarc library project appears to have changed their API
in a incompatible fashion. It's difficult to tell, because
there is no visible documentation and no obvious way to
On 08/01/2022 15:27, Julian Bradfield via Exim-users wrote:
(Tainting is the
main thing I'm aware of as a risk.)
It's also a major benefit, because it shows up places in your
config where you have coded in a manner vulnerable to attack.
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## List details at
On 08/01/2022 15:27, Julian Bradfield via Exim-users wrote:
I like things in the exim4 manual
to work in my installation!
The manuals for old releases are available on the Exim website.
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim
On 08/01/2022 14:07, Julian Bradfield via Exim-users wrote:
I wonder if anybody on this list has done such a conversion recently,
and would have time to share the chief gotchas they encountered.
Not directly, but: ALWAYS read the ChangeNotes file when changing
versions. It's there for good
On 07/01/2022 16:23, Michael Naef via Exim-users wrote:
However exim is unable to read the private key unless I make it world readable
... or you make it readable by the group exim runs as. Or the user exim runs
as.
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## List details at
On 06/01/2022 15:38, Anton via Exim-users wrote:
can identity check fail when domain check succeeded and vice versa?
Since the signature is the same, selector is the same, etc.
If the values are different in the header, the result can be different.
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## List details at
On 05/01/2022 14:49, Anton via Exim-users wrote:
is it an intended behavior and why?
Does the dkim header have both d= and i= ?
Assuming yes, it's up for argument whether de "domains" and "identities"
should be deduplicated together or as separate classes.
I does seem pointless for someone
On 29/12/2021 11:42, Cyborg via Exim-users wrote:
Am 29.12.21 um 12:10 schrieb Jeremy Harris via Exim-users:
Each delivery attempt (re)runs the routing (hence, changes
in things like DNS will get picked up) and starts with a
clean slate as far as cached lookup results goes.
the "ro
On 29/12/2021 10:46, Andrew C Aitchison via Exim-users wrote:
(When) are lookups cached between delivery attempts ?
They are not, absent deliberate placing of lookup results
into variables (coded in the ACL config).
Each delivery attempt (re)runs the routing (hence, changes
in things like DNS
On 29/12/2021 09:45, Cyborg via Exim-users wrote:
It was about changing environments while in queue.
There's two parts to this.
1) (The bit Evgeny spoke to):
Once a message is frozen, that frozen state is on the message
in the spool. The configuration is not relevant.
2) The Exim
On 23/12/2021 10:38, Leon Fellows via Exim-users wrote:
Should I just post them here?
Or should I better upload them to somewhere?
Here is ok if you can edit it down to only the
info for this message handling.
Or, use a pastebin.
But you'll be publishing valuable info to the world;
you might
On 23/12/2021 08:16, Leon Fellows via Exim-users wrote:
What could I do to better debug this?
Add +pid to your log specifier. We want to know if the
process running the delivery ("=>" line) is obviously
closely associated with the one doing the acceptance ("<=").
If it is, then we will need
On 22/12/2021 17:57, Michael Haardt via Exim-users wrote:
Would it be possible to expand all strings when reading the configuration
without causing side effects to check any attempt of using tainted data
at start up?
No. Variables are used for data which varies on a finer grain
than "exim
On 22/12/2021 16:59, Michael Haardt via Exim-users wrote:
Would it be feasible to replace the tainted bool with a bitfield,
and have e.g. a file lookup only clear the bit for file operations and
quote_ldap only clear the bit for ldap?
It wouldn't mesh well with the current implementation, nor
On 22/12/2021 15:41, Michael Haardt via Exim-users wrote:
Yes, for the ldap lookup here, quoting should be done.
I agree. The question is how to proceed on this.
domainlist d2 = ldap;ldap::///ou=mail,dc=do,dc=main?mailDomain?sub?mailDomain=$domain
becomes
domainlist d2 =
On 22/12/2021 13:48, Michael Haardt via Exim-users wrote:
LOCALDOM = /etc/exim4/localdomains
domainlist d1 = @:localhost:LOCALDOM
domainlist d2 =
ldap;ldap::///ou=mail,dc=do,dc=main?mailDomain?sub?mailDomain=$domain
domainlist local_domains = +d1 : +d2
Why would that not be tainted? The
On 22/12/2021 13:11, Michael Haardt via Exim-users wrote:
Perhaps quote_ldap should return an untainted string?
No, it does no real checking so would just be
an easy thing to abuse.
How would you do that? After all, originally it was introduced to prevent
just that, so people need to know.
On 22/12/2021 12:52, Michael Haardt via Exim-users wrote:
Perhaps quote_ldap should return an untainted string?
No, it does no real checking so would just be
an easy thing to abuse.
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at
On 22/12/2021 12:31, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users wrote:
On 22/12/2021 07:33, Christian Balzer via Exim-users wrote:
LOCALDOM = /etc/exim4/localdomains
domainlist local_domains =
@:localhost:LOCALDOM:ldap;ldap::///ou=mail,dc=do,dc=main?mailDomain?sub?mailDomain=$domain
I'm not sure what you
On 22/12/2021 07:33, Christian Balzer via Exim-users wrote:
LOCALDOM = /etc/exim4/localdomains
domainlist local_domains =
@:localhost:LOCALDOM:ldap;ldap::///ou=mail,dc=do,dc=main?mailDomain?sub?mailDomain=$domain
Doh. Ignore my previous question; I'd misread.
This issue here is that the use
On 22/12/2021 07:33, Christian Balzer via Exim-users wrote:
LOCALDOM = /etc/exim4/localdomains
domainlist local_domains =
@:localhost:LOCALDOM:ldap;ldap::///ou=mail,dc=do,dc=main?mailDomain?sub?mailDomain=$domain
Could you use the ldap_default_servers option to specify
the LDAP source, rather
On 20/12/2021 18:35, Leon Fellows via Exim-users wrote:
local_parts = lsearch;/etc/mail/domains/$domain_data
But the $local_part_data is empty.
If your file just has the word in it once, that is the key
for a lookup returning the rest of the line... which is empty.
Look at the
On 14/12/2021 12:58, Olaf Hopp (SCC) via Exim-users wrote:
is there a more elegant solution ?
If the router calling that transport, or some previous router
in the chain preceding, happened to have done successful
domain= and/or local_parts= tests, then the corresponding _data
variables will be
On 10/12/2021 08:46, Martin Fischer via Exim-users wrote:
2021-12-09 14:07:25 1mvK4y-007pOT-RQ **postmas...@.xxx R=dkim_lookuphost
T=dkim_remote_smtp H=xx01b.mail.protection.outlook.com [104.47.17.138]
X=TLS1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256 CV=yes: SMTP error from remote mail ser
On 10/12/2021 20:45, MRob via Exim-users wrote:
warn condition = ${if match{$h_Subject:}{\N(foo(bar))\N}}
How can see the matched subgroups?
warnset acl_m_mymatchedstring = ${if match{$h_Subject:}{\N(foo(bar))\N}
{$1}}
condition = ${if def:acl_m_mymatchedstring}
logwrite
sql_user:
driver = accept
domains = +local_domains : +virtual_domains
local_parts = lsearch; /etc/exim4/locale <--- hint01 --->
On 09/12/2021 19:16, Alexander Nagel via Exim-users wrote:
There is only one line with my name.
On 08/12/2021 15:05, Mauricio López via Exim-users wrote:
I used to have an Exim forward configuration that allowed me to forward
all messages with a 'reserved' username at any domain hosted in the
server to a predefined account, (ie postmaster@[anydomain] to
On 05/12/2021 18:21, Mcgiwer via Exim-users wrote:
The question is related to the commands starting from the dot (like for
example: .ifdef .. .endif, .include, etc.):
1. where could I find the documentation of it on the Exim4 documentation
website?
Start at
On 09/12/2021 11:20, Alexander Nagel via Exim-users wrote:
If you need more info, I'm happy to provide it.
What is in the file, for the key you are looking up?
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
On 30/11/2021 22:02, Johnnie W Adams via Exim-users wrote:
denymessage = Encrypted connection required - contact IT
Services for assistance
!encrypted= *
condition = ${if ={$interface_port}{587}}
In what ACL?
I'm trying to configure
On 25/11/2021 15:47, Jim Pazarena via Exim-users wrote:
when the entire content of a spam email message is in base64 , is there a
variable available that has that content in decoded text so that a filter can
view it ?
Messages can be big. Exim does not directly give access to the body *in
On 19/11/2021 18:28, Paul Warren via Exim-users wrote:
We have an SMTP transport which selects the outbound interface based on a
number of factors.
We have noticed that if a mail is not delivered immediately, it is sometimes delivered as
an additional message on an existing connection which
On 19/11/2021 18:28, Paul Warren via Exim-users wrote:
We have noticed that if a mail is not delivered immediately, it is sometimes
delivered as an additional message on an existing connection which may not be
using the same interface.
What version of Exim? What choices did the router make?
On 19/11/2021 05:58, Odhiambo Washington via Exim-users wrote:
It would be great if such messages were rejected by default.
The template config file includes ACL to do that, since 4.88
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details
On 19/11/2021 13:13, Odhiambo Washington via Exim-users wrote:
Does the length check look at bytes or the number of characters?
if ${length_1000:$h_References:} ??
The documentation does say. And why not use ${strlen } ?
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## List details at
On 19/11/2021 01:27, Wakko Warner via Exim-users wrote:
When I try to use $sender_host_name, the first lookup works. All subsequent
lookups return the the same as the first one. I'm guessing the name isn't
cleared in the main process.
Would this be a correct assumption?
Yup. This looks
On 18/11/2021 23:05, Bill Cole via Exim-users wrote:
Checks of the peer IP against a hostlist item which is a name
will cause one, as will matching the host_lookup option or
an explicit verify=reverse_host_lookup ACL condition.
So, if none of that happens, what will the Received header look
On 18/11/2021 19:10, Bill Cole via Exim-users wrote:
Also welcome, short of a patch, would be clues about how to detect in an
Exim-written Received header when a SMTP client IP has no rDNS or the rDNS name
doesn't resolve to the client IP.
It would be more reliable to interpret an
On 18/11/2021 20:36, Odhiambo Washington via Exim-users wrote:
Better solution is to fold this header (split over multiple lines).
How do I achieve that with exim-4.95? Config option??
There's no builtin support in Exim. In fact, not all possible lines
*can* be folded - you're only
On 18/11/2021 08:07, Nico Rittner via Exim-users wrote:
how to use expansion strings with >256 characters with "-be" ?
You cannot.
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with
On 18/11/2021 10:35, Andrea Biscuola via Exim-users wrote:
One week ago, we upgraded to exim 4.95 and suddenly, some customers (using
microsoft
outlook, nonetheless), started to experience the following error for *some* of
their
e-mails:
message has lines too long for transport
On 18/11/2021 14:53, Matt Corallo via Exim-users wrote:
Received: from o13.mailer.shopify.com ([149.72.221.62])
by mail.as397444.net with esmtps TLS1.3 id 1mmjFb-0034Ki-02
(envelope-from
)
for vmstfp...@mattcorallo.com; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 21:10:54 +
Specifically, it seems
On 17/11/2021 17:13, Patrick Porteous via Exim-users wrote:
If I'm running a filter file that looks for a string in the headers, is there a
variable that stores the condition when it's matched?
Not directly. If you write that "contains" as a regex for "matches"
then the $ variable are set
On 11/11/2021 18:14, Marc Bakos via Exim-users wrote:
The error in the log I get is: "Taint mismatch, string_vformat:
auth_dovecot_server 282".
As Odihambo says, that's a shouldn't-happen error - indicating
an internal Exim bug and not something you've done wrong in your
config.
What version
On 13/11/2021 21:18, JHM via Exim-users wrote:
On 13 Nov 2021 at 16:35, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users wrote:
On 13/11/2021 15:50, JHM via Exim-users wrote:
IPv6 socket creation failed: Address family not supported by protocol
Inferring that the system as a whole has no ipv6 support would
On 13/11/2021 15:50, JHM via Exim-users wrote:
IPv6 socket creation failed: Address family not supported by protocol
The trouble is that this error only tell us that this specific
socket create failed. Inferring that the system as a whole has
no ipv6 support would be a bit of a step.
We
On 02/11/2021 20:29, Niels Kobschätzki via Exim-users wrote:
::1 in "0.0.0.0 : 127.0.0.0/8 : 192.168.0.0/16 : 10.0.0.0/8 : 172.16.0.0/12 :
[::1/128]"? no (malformed IPv4 address or address mask)
That test took an error.
[::1/128] is not a valid address-list element.
You either need 1
On 30/10/2021 16:02, John Stegenga via Exim-users wrote:
what logs would you like to see?
All of the logged information for one such problem message.
Sorry I'm relatively inexperienced here, so thanks very much.
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than
On 30/10/2021 11:56, Dominik Vogt via Exim-users wrote:
No idea to what values of the upper case variables are in the
first place. Are they defined at compile time; is there a way to
look them up, other than from the Debian src package?
They are macros, not variables. They will be defined
On 30/10/2021 00:01, Dominik Vogt via Exim-users wrote:
Since the Devuan 3 to 4 upgrade, my Exim 4.94.2 installation has a
problem with TLS certificates.
The local exit is set up to relay outgoing mail that is sent by
user X to server B and all other outgoing mail to server A. Both
servers
On 29/10/2021 20:14, John Stegenga via Exim-users wrote:
Your advice and expertise is quite welcome!
Your relevant log entries?
His relevant log entries?
You've given no useful information.
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim
On 26/10/2021 17:17, Marco Gaiarin via Exim-users wrote:
require: condition test succeeded in ACL "acl_check_rcpt"
processing "require"
message: ${if >{$rcpt_fail_count}{0} {unrouteable address}{unknown user}}
[...]
require: condition test failed in ACL "acl_check_rcpt"
SMTP>> 550
On 23/10/2021 02:58, AC via Exim-users wrote:
I currently have smtp_accept_max_per_connection configured to reduce the number
of connections bots can make to the server.
The docs say
"the number of MAIL commands that Exim is prepared to accept over a single SMTP
connection"
which is not
On 22/10/2021 15:09, Joseph Kezar via Exim-users wrote:
/usr/bin/ld: hash.c:(.text+0xb9): undefined reference to `EVP_sha3_256'
That looks like an OpenSSL routine name. Check you have a consistent
set of TLS-related definitions in your Local/Makefile, and do a
"make distclean".
--
Cheers,
On 17/10/2021 18:15, Sherin A via Exim-users wrote:
Is it possible to add multiple system_filter files in exim like
system_filter = /etc/my.filter : /etc/your.filter
I mean it is possible to include multiple system filters for exim as global
files. Any help will be appreciated.
No.
--
On 18/10/2021 09:46, Nick Rickard via Exim-users wrote:
I'd like to have the equivalent of '127.0.0.0/24' or '127.0.0.*' as accepted
matches.
Does
dnslists =abcdef.sbl.dq.spamhaus.net
condition = ${if match_ip ($dnslist_value) {127.0.0.0/24}}
do what you need?
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
On 16/10/2021 10:08, Simon Josefsson via Exim-users wrote:
Dovecot SMTP submission agent complains about Exim's
PIPE_CONNECT:
Oct 16 10:32:32 pippi dovecot:
submission(simon)<111236><8poyJ3TOeNEgAQmxQaz/ANGknOU4qRZw>: Warning:
smtp-client: conn pippi.sjd.se:25 (127.0.1.1:25) [1]: Received
On 16/10/2021 17:56, Slavko via Exim-users wrote:
And BTW, i see significant delay between i send message to ML and get
it back (>1 hour).
That's not just you. We're running a fair-size backlog at present.
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## List details at
On 14/10/2021 12:12, Odhiambo Washington via Exim-users wrote:
In the section where it discusses the "Transition period considerations"
Strangely enough, the Exim docs says pretty much the same.
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
##
On 09/10/2021 23:25, Oliver Heesakkers via Exim-users wrote:
I've done some more testing and have been reliably able to reproduce the
problem. The problem always occurs (in my test setup) when I have av_scanner
set up to a clamd TCP socket, regardless whether it's local (127.0.01), remote,
On 08/10/2021 23:40, Evgeniy Berdnikov via Exim-users wrote:
# for s in "validity" "algorithm" "notBefore" "serialNumber" "rdnSequence" "tbsCertificate"
"utcTime" ; do echo -n "$s: " ; strings core.1400692 | grep -c "^$s\$" ; done
validity: 634
algorithm: 3661
notBefore: 633
serialNumber: 524
On 08/10/2021 15:42, Andrew Colin Kissa via Exim-users wrote:
I am seeing this intermittently on a Linux system not FreeBSD.
That is very useful info; thanks.
I am willing to test this, any pointers on getting the info you want to
determine the cause ?
Enable coredumps for suid processes,
On 07/10/2021 08:49, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
That developer seems to have missed that, apparently, Exim catches the
signal SIGSEGV, which means that signal will never cause a coredump.
Wrong, right, and wrong (in that order).
If "that developer" is supposed to mean me, I'd point
out that
On 05/10/2021 13:03, Torsten Luettgert via Exim-users wrote:
the exim process prints "free(): invalid pointer".
That implies it will try to coredump, I think. Can you
do whatever magic Arch needs for coredumps from suid programs,
compile a version with "-O0 -g" (or -ggdb), get a coredump,
On 05/10/2021 17:35, Cyborg via Exim-users wrote:
Am 05.10.21 um 15:17 schrieb Laura Williamson via Exim-users:
Hi
Getting this error with 4.95, does not happen with 4.94.2, any idea?
Best
That's 2 GB of Memory or in 32 Bit 0x7FFF aka a signed int.
I make it 2^31 - 16
- certainly a
On 01/10/2021 18:34, Matthew Daubenspeck via Exim-users wrote:
local_aliases:
driver = redirect
allow_defer
allow_fail
domains = lsearch;/etc/exim/config/local.domains
data = ${lookup{$local_part}lsearch{/etc/exim/config/$domain/local.aliases}}
$domain contains tainted data
On 04/10/2021 16:35, Cyborg via Exim-users wrote:
Fedora 33 4.92.2-1
Assuming that's based on the project exim-4.92.2 release,
it's 2 years old. There are some 30 commits mentioning
DKIM between 4.92 and 4.95. However, I don't find either
"rejected DKIM" or "with invalid" in the current
On 04/10/2021 15:10, Cyborg via Exim-users wrote:
while investigating a DKIM problem, this messages was found:
Distro? Version?
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with
On 03/10/2021 11:44, Oliver Heesakkers via Exim-users wrote:
Before I go crazy with all the debug-options, were you (or anyone else in this
thread) ever able to determine the cause of these SIGSEGVs?
Nothing that was said here on the ML, at least.
I repeat my previous request:
if there's
On 28/09/2021 23:41, Viktor Dukhovni via Exim-users wrote:
- fast-ramp queue run
- native SRS
- TLS resumption
I'd like to ask, if I may, how TLS resumption interacts with DANE or
other authenticated TLS policy, assuming potential earlier
unauthenticated TLS connections to the same
On 01/10/2021 06:00, s.xx.david--- via Exim-users wrote:
I assume this means the debian packages_were_ compiled with WITH_CONTENT_SCAN
on!?
exim -bV | grep Content_Scanning
will tell you that.
If I merely change it to add the 11333 variant=rspamd, exim4 fails to
restart
Try manually
On 30/09/2021 15:43, Sabahattin Gucukoglu via Exim-users wrote:
On 28 Sep 2021, at 22:19, Heiko Schlittermann via Exim-users
wrote:
- Removed:
- support for MacOS
This makes me sad.
Was there any particular reason?
Nobody was maintaining the sole resgression-testing system, and
On 29/09/2021 16:07, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users wrote:
condition = ${if def:varA}
condition = ${if def:varB}
condition = ${if != {$varA}{$varB}}
Wups. Use !eq rather than != if the values are
strings rather than numbers.
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org
On 28/09/2021 17:01, v via Exim-users wrote:
I'm trying to add a condition to an ACL that would say:
if $varA is-not-blank and $varB is-not-blank and $varA not equal $varB
condition = ${if def:varA}
condition = ${if def:varB}
condition = ${if != {$varA}{$varB}}
That's it. There's an
On 23/09/2021 04:26, Eric Schoeller via Exim-users wrote:
So 'connection_max_messages' , 'max_rcpt' and 'max_parallel' can all be placed
under the 'remote_smtp_smarthost' and 'remote_smtp' transport sections, correct?
They are transport options. See the definitions in the manual as
to where
On 20/09/2021 17:05, Andreas Barth via Exim-users wrote:
I'd
like to take the decision in an filter script, and not within the main
configuration file.
Is there a way to achive that?
Nothing that comes to mind is particularly convenient.
I'd suggest that you can probably do anything you want
On 18/09/2021 11:17, Andreas Barth via Exim-users wrote:
What would be the most appropriate way to set the envelope from
address in this situation
Does the return_path transport option do what you need?
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## List details at
On 16/09/2021 13:54, Sherin A via Exim-users wrote:
Lets encrypt ssl certificate = /etc/letsencrypt/live/foo.com/fullchain.pem
Lets encrypt ssl key = /etc/letsencrypt/live/foo.com/privkey.pem
Commercial ssl certificate =
/var/panel/userdata/foouser/ssl/foo.com-combined.pem
On 13/09/2021 05:20, Eric Schoeller via Exim-users wrote:
10 messages per connection
connection_max_messages transport option
100 recipients per message
max_rcpt transport option
10 concurrent connections per IP
max_parallel transport option
3600 recipients per hour per host
3600
On 16/09/2021 12:18, Cyborg via Exim-users wrote:
Do a debug run and check, if it's really used:
exim -d externaldomaint...@mydomain.com < /tmp/mail.fail
use the suspended address, fake a mail to that address and watch the routers list to be
processed. You can see, if the condition you
On 14/09/2021 18:50, Patrick via Exim-users wrote:
should I start a new thread with my findings?
This.
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list -
On 13/09/2021 18:19, Patrick Boutilier via Exim-users wrote:
Accept routers log to mainlog with R= , such as:
2021-09-13 14:05:02 1mPpOA-0007aw-AX => test
R=mysql_autorespond_staff T=address_mysql
This is the delivery that is being logged, and the R= there is the (last)
router; the one
On 10/09/2021 09:13, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users wrote:
On 10/09/2021 01:31, Patrick via Exim-users wrote:
Before I spend too much time trying to figure this out, is it possible to
configure my PostgreSQL connection to use passwordless certificate based
authentication?
Nope. We're using
On 10/09/2021 01:31, Patrick via Exim-users wrote:
Before I spend too much time trying to figure this out, is it possible to
configure my PostgreSQL connection to use passwordless certificate based
authentication?
Nope. We're using what seems to be an older API for the client-connection
On 08/09/2021 10:14, David Restall via Exim-users wrote:
Granted (I did allude to this in the email) but what actually is the
problem that it is masking ?
The problem arises from a program of constification of the Exim source.
That is, using the 'C' const qualifer to mark up variables that we
401 - 500 of 1542 matches
Mail list logo
