Does Exim support dnssec?
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
A yes or no answer would have been far easier than your long insult.
You have a bad and unprofessional attitude for a support forum.
On 7/15/2013 11:23 PM, Jethro R Binks wrote:
On Mon, 15 Jul 2013, Marc Perkel wrote:
Does Exim support dnssec?
Would it be too much to suggest you employ
In evaluating the result of a dnslist lookup would regex like syntax work?
dnslists = dnswl.junkemailfilter.com=127.0.\d+.[23]
Thanks in advance
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this
Here are my authenticators:
dovecot_plain:
driver = dovecot
public_name = PLAIN
server_socket = /var/run/dovecot/auth-client
server_set_id = $auth1
dovecot_login:
driver = dovecot
public_name = LOGIN
server_socket = /var/run/dovecot/auth-client
server_set_id = $auth1
How would
, you have to use ACL configurations
as described by others.
--
Dean Brooks
d...@iglou.com
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 07:49:09AM -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
Here are my authenticators:
dovecot_plain:
driver = dovecot
public_name = PLAIN
server_socket = /var/run/dovecot/auth-client
Except that it's not what I can use.
On 6/6/2013 9:50 AM, Todd Lyons wrote:
Marc, go read the pages that Lena wrote. In it are the ACL stanzas you need.
...Todd
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 8:24 AM, Marc Perkel m...@perkel.com wrote:
I need to set a variable
set acl_m_auth_failed = true
ok - I see it. Brain dead today.
On 6/6/2013 10:15 AM, Graeme Fowler wrote:
On 6 Jun 2013, at 17:57, Marc Perkel m...@perkel.com wrote:
Except that it's not what I can use.
Yes, it is. It's absolutely something you can use, if you wrap your brain
around it and extract the right bits.
You
The ACL condition
authenticated = *
Includes failed authentications
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
Here's an idea I'm working on. Wondering if anyone else is interested in
participating.
As you all know there are a lot of SMTP servers (inbound) where there is
o authentication option. And we all know that there are lots of hackers
and hack viruses that work on authenticated smtp servers
I want to artificially create a 553 error. Can I do that?
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
Is there a way for an ACL to do something on authentication failure? I'm
trying to trap the IP addresses of hackers trying to guess passwords.
Thanks in advance
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the
Hi Dave,
This looks useful. I don't see any docs on $authenticated_lookup. I
assume it returns true if auth succeeds?
On 6/5/2013 11:01 AM, Dave Restall - System Administrator,,, wrote:
Hi Marc,
Is there a way for an ACL to do something on authentication failure? I'm
trying to trap the
Thinking about setting up a spam trap. Advertizing AUTH on a server that
isn't used for that and blocking anyone who is trying to use it.
Basically making a list of IP addresses of hackers trying to guess
passwords.
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
##
On 5/18/2013 6:00 AM, Graeme Fowler wrote:
On Fri, 2013-05-17 at 20:30 -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
Maybe I'm doing something wrong but when I do it the new added headers
aren't included. I'm running:
spam = root:true
...and you're adding the headers how, exactly, and in which ACLs?
Graeme
On 5/17/2013 1:46 AM, Graeme Fowler wrote:
On Thu, 2013-05-16 at 21:38 -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
Since Exim doesn't include messages headers that were added by ACLs when
passing messages to SpamAssassin I was wondering if there were any
tricks that anyone has to send information between Exim
I'd like to be able to do this:
spamd_address = 184.105.182.5${eval:${substr{-2}{1}{$tod_zulu}}%3} 783
But it doesn't work. I want to do load balancing between 3 spamd servers.
Thanks in advance
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at
Since Exim doesn't include messages headers that were added by ACLs when
passing messages to SpamAssassin I was wondering if there were any
tricks that anyone has to send information between Exim and SA?
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details
warncondition = ${if or {\
{exists{$acl_m_domain_directory/some-sa}}\
{exists{$acl_m_user_directory/some-sa}}\
}{yes}{no}}
set acl_m_sa_reject_level = 210
Condition always returns true even when both files do not exist.
What
It does work. Nevermind!
On 4/24/2013 7:17 PM, Marc Perkel wrote:
warn condition = ${if or {\
{exists{$acl_m_domain_directory/some-sa}}\
{exists{$acl_m_user_directory/some-sa}}\
}{yes}{no}}
set acl_m_sa_reject_level = 210
Getting this error:
regex acl condition warning - error in regex '}{\': \ at end of pattern
at offset 3, skipped
But - don't know where it is. It doesn't show any line numbers or even
what acl it's in. Wondering how to track it down.
Thanks in advance
--
## List details at
On 4/14/2013 8:17 AM, Jeremy Harris wrote:
On 04/14/2013 01:55 AM, Marc Perkel wrote:
On 4/13/2013 8:42 AM, Jeremy Harris wrote:
On 04/13/2013 06:46 AM, Marc Perkel wrote:
Is there an easy way to do an ACL conditional based on message age?
First define what variant of age you're
I'm trying to run a command and return the result into a variable in an
ACL. How do you do that? The docs needs an example.
The command examples are:
date +%s
date --d $h_date: +%s
Thanks in advance.
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at
On 4/14/2013 9:16 AM, Marc Perkel wrote:
I'm trying to run a command and return the result into a variable in
an ACL. How do you do that? The docs needs an example.
The command examples are:
date +%s
date --d $h_date: +%s
Thanks in advance.
I figured it out
# Date and Age
warn
On 4/13/2013 8:42 AM, Jeremy Harris wrote:
On 04/13/2013 06:46 AM, Marc Perkel wrote:
Is there an easy way to do an ACL conditional based on message age?
First define what variant of age you're interested in.
I can think of several.
Yeah - I think some misunderstood. I'm talking about
Is there an easy way to do an ACL conditional based on message age? So
if something is older than XX days I can bounce it?
Thanks in advance.
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list
On 4/10/2013 10:43 PM, Brent Jones wrote:
Has anyone considered, or already made a rate limiting ACL using readsocket?
Besides writing a simple daemon, I don't see any reason not to try this out.
I envision sending various data to the daemon, like sender IP, recipients,
sender address, then
On 12/5/2012 9:28 PM, Phil Pennock wrote:
Use trusted_users to declare some user to be trusted, and run the
delivery as that user. A little more effort to read documentation for
yourself would get you much more support and help on those occasions
when you do post to the public lists. -Phil
On 12/4/2012 10:21 AM, Phil Pennock wrote:
On 2012-12-04 at 07:15 -0800, Marc Perkel wrote:
The email vanishes when I try this. If however I run it out to a file
can then cat the file from the command line through the same filter it
works. Not sure what I'm doing wrong.
Trying to run code
I think I fixed it.
prod_requires_admin = false
On 12/4/2012 10:21 AM, Phil Pennock wrote:
On 2012-12-04 at 07:15 -0800, Marc Perkel wrote:
The email vanishes when I try this. If however I run it out to a file
can then cat the file from the command line through the same filter it
works
Hi,
I'm trying to pipe email into this script:
/bin/grep -v X-SPF-Sucks | /bin/sed -e 's/^MAIL FROM:.*$/MAIL
FROM:spfsu...@junkemailfilter.com/g' | /usr/sbin/exim -bS
The email vanishes when I try this. If however I run it out to a file
can then cat the file from the command line through
This might be really easy but I can't seem to find it. After receiving
an email how do I change the sender (mail from: in smtp - not the From:
header) before forwarding it to the recipient?
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at
On 11/19/2012 10:32 AM, Dave Lugo wrote:
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012, Marc Perkel wrote:
This might be really easy but I can't seem to find it. After
receiving an email how do I change the sender (mail from: in smtp -
not the From: header) before forwarding it to the recipient?
31. Address
Get a really fast SSD drive for the spool files. That will make it run a
lot faster.
On 11/9/2012 5:18 AM, Jorge wrote:
Hi,
I'm testing Exim and I have noted that allmost all emails processed take
minimal 5 seconds, that is measured on mainlog file between = and =
records.
That time is taken
I'll do bugzilla if I'm not crazy but thought I'd post it here first to
see if I'm nuts.
In the transports this works:
helo_data = SERVER_NAME.junkemailfilter.com
However this does not work:
helo_data = $acl_c_helo_data
The helo becomes an empty string. And I'm sure the variable is set
In the mail acl I have:
accept hosts = orange.nl
However orange.nl has their DNS down and I get a temp error on EVERYTHING.
2012-10-18 10:02:19 H=mx1.appearseen.com [31.171.132.8] temporarily
rejected MAIL r...@mx1.appearseen.com
However if I do:
warn hosts = orange.nl
At least it
On 10/18/2012 10:26 AM, Dave Lugo wrote:
On Thu, 18 Oct 2012, Marc Perkel wrote:
In the mail acl I have:
accept hosts = orange.nl
However orange.nl has their DNS down and I get a temp error on
EVERYTHING.
2012-10-18 10:02:19 H=mx1.appearseen.com [31.171.132.8] temporarily
rejected MAIL
On 10/18/2012 6:38 PM, Phil Pennock wrote:
On 2012-10-18 at 06:55 -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
I'll do bugzilla if I'm not crazy but thought I'd post it here first to
see if I'm nuts.
In the transports this works:
helo_data = SERVER_NAME.junkemailfilter.com
However this does not work
On 10/18/2012 6:38 PM, Phil Pennock wrote:
On 2012-10-18 at 06:55 -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
I'll do bugzilla if I'm not crazy but thought I'd post it here first to
see if I'm nuts.
In the transports this works:
helo_data = SERVER_NAME.junkemailfilter.com
However this does not work
On 10/17/2012 7:21 AM, Graeme Fowler wrote:
On Wed, 2012-10-17 at 10:03 -0400, SonicFog wrote:
When AOL sends the scamp message there is only one way of determining
original AOL email address. The only clue in AOL scamp email is the
'message-id' identifier. Do a search of your exim_mainlog
As you know when AOL send out one of its scomp message where a user has
complained aol masks the identity of the complainer redacting it from
the message jheaders it returns.
Just wondering if anyone has found a way to encrypt the aol user in a
way that when the scomp message is sent the
Just wondering - has anyone found an easy way to look inside a .zip
attachment with Exim to get a list of the files contained inside?
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list -
Here's what I'm trying to do. I have a spam filtering operation as a
front end for other servers. I've created a virtual server for spam
storage where the user will be able to log in using squirrelmail/dovecot
to review and release their false positives. The email is stored in
maildir format.
What I found works best is to put the exim queue in a ram disk and set
it up to try one time and then transfer the message to another server to
retry that uses an SSD drive for the queue.
On 9/2/2012 2:40 AM, Ron White wrote:
Good morning,
More to satisfy my own curiosity than anything else,
It's always set. I set it at connect time. Any for the most part it
stays set. Any chance it can be a race condition?
On 5/29/2012 2:20 AM, John Horne wrote:
On Mon, 2012-05-28 at 21:10 -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
However - if I set a variable:
set acl_c_helo_data
Transport looks like this and works normally:
process_and_forward_smtp:
driver = smtp
delivery_date_add
interface = $acl_c_smtp_out
helo_data = SERVER_NAME.junkemailfilter.com
However - if I set a variable:
set acl_c_helo_data = SERVER_NAME.junkemailfilter.com
and then use this
On 5/20/2012 8:25 AM, Jonas Eckerman wrote:
On 2012-05-18 23:59, Marc Perkel wrote:
Here's a possible example. There are servers out there that return
country codes of IP addresses. But what about a country code for a host
name? You would have to do an IP lookup on the host and then use
On 5/20/2012 9:57 AM, Christof Meerwald wrote:
On Fri, 18 May 2012 14:59:09 -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
So - is there source code for something like this or a DNS server with a
scripting language?
PowerDNS (http://www.powerdns.com/) can be scripted via a built-in lua
backend or an out
I have a few weird ideas and would need a smart DNS server of some sort
to pull it off. Basically looking for a programmable backend that might
do DNS lookups itself.
Here's a possible example. There are servers out there that return
country codes of IP addresses. But what about a country
Except that this happens almost right away. Not sure what's causing it.
# DomainErrorRetries
# ------
\N^abuse@.*$\N*F,1h,15m
\N^.*-feed@.*$\N*
*@dbm;/etc/exim/control/run/alllocal.db*F,1h,5m; F,1w,1h
#
On 3/17/2012 3:58 AM, anand wrote:
Hi, Below mentioned is our server configuration, We are trying to send
around 300,000 emails a day(all opt in data). But the problem is when we
send out only 100,000 emails. The mails gets stuck in queue and the sending
speed is very low. We tried many thing
I'm sure I must be blind but I'm trying to figure out where the
variables are that set the timeouts on outgoing email.
Thanks in advance
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list -
On 3/13/2012 1:19 PM, Mike Kennedy wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 2:44 PM, Marc Perkel m...@perkel.com
mailto:m...@perkel.com wrote:
I'm sure I must be blind but I'm trying to figure out where the
variables are that set the timeouts on outgoing email.
Thanks in advance
On 3/10/2012 10:46 AM, Andrew Colin Kissa wrote:
On 10 Mar 2012, at 8:34 PM, Marc Perkel wrote:
Thanks - I figured it out. Just trying to get rid of those chineese spams with
xls attachments.
On 3/10/2012 8:58 AM, Marc Perkel wrote:
How would I create a Regex expression to capture mime
Just a quick question. SPF breaks email forwarding. Does DMARC get
around this limitation?
On 1/31/2012 1:32 AM, Oliver Howe wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone have any experience of using DMARC?
See http://dmarc.org/overview.html
and
Not sure what this error means:
R=delay10 T=bsmtp_delay_mail defer (-4): mailbox /delay/0/ has too many
links (2)
Thanks in advance
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list -
Never mind - I figured it out. I was creating a file based on the sender
name and when the sender was emty it tried to create one that matched
the directory name
On 1/15/2012 7:09 AM, Marc Perkel wrote:
Not sure what this error means:
R=delay10 T=bsmtp_delay_mail defer (-4): mailbox /delay/0
On 1/12/2012 10:20 AM, Jeff Lassman wrote:
On Monday, January 02, 2012 11:49:07 AM The Doctor wrote:
The bigger sticker is this:
someone poisons an account with a spamming script.
The only way to detect this is the set up outbound spam
detection to protect your reputation.
There are
Is there some repository I can add for Centos 6 that includes Exim?
Thanks in advance
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
Thanks - that's what I ended up doing.
On 12/15/2011 8:37 PM, Phil Pennock wrote:
On 2011-12-14 at 14:34 -0800, Marc Perkel wrote:
I'm probably blind but I'm looking for a variable to read to determine
either the return code of the last message sent or perhaps whether there
was a deny. Just
I'm probably blind but I'm looking for a variable to read to determine
either the return code of the last message sent or perhaps whether there
was a deny. Just something to tell of the email was passed or not.
Not sure I'm being clear.
--
## List details at
Just wanted to share a trick I'm trying on backup MX servers to prevent
spam. As you know often spammers will try the backup MX server hoping
the backup has less spam filtering. But if the primary server is online
there's no reason to use the backup. So the idea is - if the primary is
up -
On 11/14/2011 5:47 AM, Graeme Fowler wrote:
On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 05:35 -0800, Marc Perkel wrote:
I'm still playing with this. Probable also need to reduce or eliminate
caching on the recipient callout. But I thought I'd post it in case
someone finds it useful.
It's a fairly old technique
Not sure what changed but when I hit my send button 4.77 seems a lot faster.
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
Looks like I'm missing something but not sure what.
version 4.77 #8
gcc exim_dbmbuild.c
In file included from exim_dbmbuild.c:31:
exim.h:433:18: error: pcre.h: No such file or directory
In file included from exim.h:441,
from exim_dbmbuild.c:31:
dbstuff.h:101:16: error: db.h:
On 10/14/2011 7:06 PM, Phil Pennock wrote:
On 2011-10-14 at 16:26 +0100, John Horne wrote:
Whilst the use of EXPAND_LISTMATCH_RHS is tempting, I feel that if we
enable it then we should make the effort to see if there is some
mechanism the developers could provide to make things easier for
If you just have 45 gigs of data who not go with SSD drives? SSD is
really fast.
On 9/23/2011 1:13 AM, Andrey wrote:
23.09.2011 11:31, Janne Pikkarainen пишет:
Thank you for reply,
BTW, other webserver has almost the same bonnie results (10283ms and
5884ms) on ext3 partition with 45GB of
Just wondering if anyone has a trick to count the recipients on the TO
header field?
Thanks in advance
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
Thanks - I'll give that a try.
On 9/19/2011 9:01 AM, Todd Lyons wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 8:48 AM, Marc Perkelm...@perkel.com wrote:
Just wondering if anyone has a trick to count the recipients on the TO
header field?
Need a little regex help. Trying to use a match conditional in an acl to
match Chinese spreadsheet attached file names.
Just trying the idea here before I ask for a feature request.
As we all know Exim has a spamassassin interface for testing email to
see if it's spam. I'd like to see an interface added for learning email
as spam/ham from exim. In my configuration the Exim server are separate
from the SA
On 6/21/2011 7:50 AM, gra...@graemef.net wrote:
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 07:10:54 -0700, Marc Perkelm...@perkel.com wrote:
As we all know Exim has a spamassassin interface for testing email to
see if it's spam. I'd like to see an interface added for learning email
as spam/ham from exim.
More
On 6/21/2011 7:36 AM, Ted Cooper wrote:
On 22/06/11 00:10, Marc Perkel wrote:
Just trying the idea here before I ask for a feature request.
As we all know Exim has a spamassassin interface for testing email to
see if it's spam. I'd like to see an interface added for learning email
as spam
Kewl!
My droid has more memory and a faster processor that Linux servers I
used to run 10 years ago.
On 6/18/2011 5:28 AM, Mike Cardwell wrote:
Just thought it might interest a few of you. I just managed to get Exim
running on my Android phone (A rooted HTC Desire Z with Cyanogenmod 7)
by
On 6/14/2011 3:21 AM, Ian Eiloart wrote:
On 14 Jun 2011, at 05:24, Phil Pennock wrote:
On 2011-06-13 at 00:32 +, Michael Jimenez wrote:
So I've been looking at my mail server mainlog for the past couple of days
watching mail come in and out, I've noticed that this Microsoft address
On 6/14/2011 6:02 PM, Ted Cooper wrote:
On 15/06/11 01:40, Marc Perkel wrote:
It's one of those things that could be true depending on how you have
things configured. I use sender verification callouts myself without any
problems. but I use them after a lot of other tests to reduce the number
On 6/14/2011 8:16 PM, Ted Cooper wrote:
Cutting a long story short, the /var drive ran out of room and services
started dying off because of it. The machine was running (no smoke
pouring out of it), but wasn't really doing anything but printing
messages to the console about how upset it was.
Trying to understand the smtp protocol with multiple recipients. From
what I understand the recipients are specified as follows:
rcpt to:pers...@domain.com
250 Accepted
rcpt to:pers...@domain.com
250 Accepted
rcpt to:pers...@domain.com
250 Accepted
Suppose I'm doing forward callouts to verify
Trying to understand the smtp protocol with multiple recipients. From
what I understand the recipients are specified as follows:
rcpt to:pers...@domain.com
250 Accepted
rcpt to:pers...@domain.com
250 Accepted
rcpt to:pers...@domain.com
250 Accepted
Suppose I'm doing forward callouts to verify
On 4/20/2011 5:07 PM, W B Hacker wrote:
Marc Perkel wrote:
Trying to understand the smtp protocol with multiple recipients. From
what I understand the recipients are specified as follows:
rcpt to:pers...@domain.com
250 Accepted
rcpt to:pers...@domain.com
250 Accepted
rcpt to:pers
Not sure what this error means:
Warning: ACL warn statement skipped: condition test deferred
Doesn't give me much of a clue what it means and what is creating it.
--
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the
On 4/20/2011 5:07 PM, W B Hacker wrote:
Marc Perkel wrote:
Trying to understand the smtp protocol with multiple recipients. From
what I understand the recipients are specified as follows:
rcpt to:pers...@domain.com
250 Accepted
rcpt to:pers...@domain.com
250 Accepted
rcpt to:pers
like this:
|delay|exim -bS
What delay is a shell script:
#!/bin/bash
sleep 300
cat
The idea being that when the message came around the second time I'd
know whether to pass it or discard it.
On 4/10/2011 4:37 PM, Ben Allen wrote:
On Saturday 09 April 2011 18:07:58 Marc Perkel wrote:
So
Quick question
If I use queue-only then the first delivery attempt will be when the
normal retry cycle occurs?
--
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
After looking at the idea of freezing it in the queue I came up with
hopefully a better solution. This code creates a 10 minute delay.
Delayed messages are written to /delay/0. This script is run once a
minute. When it gets to 9 the email is resent.
#! /bin/bash
md /delay
cat /delay/9/*|exim
they are good I want to release them. Or if they are bad I want
to discard them. And I would have to unfreeze them by the sender because
I might be dealing with more than one account that was hacked.
On 4/10/2011 4:26 AM, l...@lena.kiev.ua wrote:
From: Marc Perkel
I've been working on outbound
I don't know how many of you have tried SSD drives but they are really
fast. If you get a small SSD drive and run /var/spool/exim on it you'll
see a significant speed jump. If you do raid 0 it's even faster. Also if
you use a fallback host to do your retries of email that doesn't get
delivered
I've been working on outbound filtering and trying to come up with a new
set of tricks. Outbound filtering is very different than inbound.
Here's the situation. An ISP has thousands of email users and some have
used week passwords or otherwise been suckered into giving up the
password. The
Is there an easy way for Exim to expand URLs from URL shortening
services? Or a command line script that would?
--
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
On 3/24/2011 3:07 PM, Heiko Schlittermann wrote:
Hello,
Dave Restall - System Administrator,,,d...@restall.net (Thu Mar 24 15:50:22
2011):
I use exim to receive and process my emails - have done for years.
I also use sender callouts - have done for years. Occasionally emails
get rejected
On 3/25/2011 4:53 AM, Ian Eiloart wrote:
--On 24 March 2011 14:50:22 + Dave Restall - System
Administrator,,, d...@restall.net wrote:
Hi,
I use exim to receive and process my emails - have done for years.
I also use sender callouts - have done for years. Occasionally emails
get
On 3/25/2011 9:59 AM, Mark Goodge wrote:
On 25/03/2011 16:49, Marc Perkel wrote:
SAV is similar in that it is useful to determine if the sender is coming
from a bogus email address. I do respect the argument that it creates
some traffic. But SPF calls also create some traffic as well so
On 3/24/2011 12:13 PM, Zoe (Medway Hosting) wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Marc Perkelm...@perkel.com
To: Dave Restall - System Administrator,,,d...@restall.net
Cc:exim-users@exim.org
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2011 6:40 PM
Subject: Re: [exim] A cry for help - are there any plusnet
Seems to be working fine so far.
--
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
Hi Dave,
I understand your frustrations dealing the the brain dead. What I do is
have a text file with a list of domains not to verify and that solves
the problem. You can also push sender verification down your list of
tests so you do less of it. For example, I do my blacklist tests,
On 3/18/2011 4:40 AM, Ian Eiloart wrote:
--On 17 March 2011 09:27:31 -0700 Marc Perkel m...@perkel.com wrote:
I was just wondering why the mailfrom option wasn't allowed in recipient
callouts?
I'm not sure about this, but I think it's something like this:
mailfrom was introduced
Is there a way to tell an ACL to just bypass and do nothing in the case
where it normally would return a Tempory Local Problem because of
something like a failed string expansion or a missing file?
The problem I'm trying to fix is that I'm allowing users to type in
strings to block messages
On 2/22/2011 8:03 AM, W B Hacker wrote:
Marc Perkel wrote:
Is there a way to tell an ACL to just bypass and do nothing in the case
where it normally would return a Tempory Local Problem because of
something like a failed string expansion or a missing file?
The problem I'm trying to fix
On 2/22/2011 8:03 AM, W B Hacker wrote:
Marc Perkel wrote:
Is there a way to tell an ACL to just bypass and do nothing in the case
where it normally would return a Tempory Local Problem because of
something like a failed string expansion or a missing file?
The problem I'm trying to fix
People in this forum need to grow up and stop acting like infants. And
I'm not talking about the fringe, I'm talking about people who are
supposed to be core supporters/developers of Exim.
The last 2 version of Exim (I skipped 4.73) introduced new policies that
broke installation that have
I'm getting exim.conf has the wrong owner, group, or mode in Exim 4.74.
Works correctly with 4.72.
-rwxr-xr-x 1 mail mail 10523 Jan 26 08:58 /etc/exim/conf/exim.conf
Not sure what I'm doing wrong.
--
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at
1 - 100 of 1131 matches
Mail list logo
