Re: [exim] DKIM verification and envelope-from

2012-04-27 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
-Original Message- From: exim-users-bounces+msk=cloudmark@exim.org [mailto:exim-users-bounces+msk=cloudmark@exim.org] On Behalf Of Robert Wysocki Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 4:08 AM To: exim-users@exim.org Subject: [exim] DKIM verification and envelope-from I'm

Re: [exim] DomainKeys + DKIM + SPF include on compilation for latest exim help

2012-03-21 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
-Original Message- From: exim-users-bounces+msk=cloudmark@exim.org [mailto:exim-users-bounces+msk=cloudmark@exim.org] On Behalf Of fmende...@terra.com Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2012 10:55 PM To: exim-users@exim.org Subject: [exim] DomainKeys + DKIM + SPF include on

Re: [exim] DMARC and Exim

2012-02-06 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
-Original Message- From: exim-users-bounces+msk=cloudmark@exim.org [mailto:exim-users-bounces+msk=cloudmark@exim.org] On Behalf Of David Woodhouse Sent: Monday, February 06, 2012 7:58 AM To: Marc Perkel Cc: exim-users@exim.org; Oliver Howe Subject: Re: [exim] DMARC and

Re: [exim] DMARC and Exim

2012-02-06 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
-Original Message- From: exim-users-bounces+msk=cloudmark@exim.org [mailto:exim-users-bounces+msk=cloudmark@exim.org] On Behalf Of Marc Perkel Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 11:11 AM To: Oliver Howe Cc: exim-users@exim.org Subject: Re: [exim] DMARC and Exim Just a

Re: [exim] DMARC and Exim

2012-02-06 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
-Original Message- From: exim-users-bounces+msk=cloudmark@exim.org [mailto:exim-users-bounces+msk=cloudmark@exim.org] On Behalf Of Phil Pennock Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 7:31 PM To: Marc Perkel Cc: exim-users@exim.org; Oliver Howe Subject: Re: [exim] DMARC and Exim

Re: [exim] milter?

2012-01-12 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
From: Odhiambo Washington [mailto:odhia...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 11:28 PM To: Murray S. Kucherawy Cc: exim-users@exim.org Subject: Re: [exim] milter? What is this milter? Is it better than Exiscan, which is already part of Exim core? I don’t know about “better

[exim] milter?

2012-01-11 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
Just out of curiosity, is there any plan for adding milter support to exim? -MSK -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/

[exim] Including state information in Received fields

2012-01-11 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
Hi, I'm co-authoring a draft that would add supplementary information to Received header fields indicating when a message enters some kind of administrative hold. This would be useful to people looking through trace data to figure out why a message sat on a machine for some time, if the

Re: [exim] Including state information in Received fields

2012-01-11 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
-Original Message- From: exim-users-bounces+msk=cloudmark@exim.org [mailto:exim-users-bounces+msk=cloudmark@exim.org] On Behalf Of Jeremy Harris Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 4:28 PM To: exim-users@exim.org Subject: Re: [exim] Including state information in Received

Re: [exim] DKIM signature in outgoing emails

2011-12-17 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
-Original Message- From: exim-users-bounces+msk=cloudmark@exim.org [mailto:exim-users-bounces+msk=cloudmark@exim.org] On Behalf Of Gót András Sent: Saturday, December 17, 2011 12:58 AM To: exim-users@exim.org Subject: Re: [exim] DKIM signature in outgoing emails The

Re: [exim] DKIM signature in outgoing emails

2011-12-16 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
-Original Message- From: exim-users-bounces+msk=cloudmark@exim.org [mailto:exim-users-bounces+msk=cloudmark@exim.org] On Behalf Of and...@antiszoc.hu Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2011 2:26 AM To: exim-users@exim.org Subject: [exim] DKIM signature in outgoing emails

Re: [exim] Is DomainsKeys (DK not DKIM) disabled since v4.70-4.71?

2011-09-12 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
-Original Message- From: exim-users-bounces+msk=cloudmark@exim.org [mailto:exim-users-bounces+msk=cloudmark@exim.org] On Behalf Of Pedro Mansilla Sent: Sunday, September 11, 2011 1:59 PM To: exim-users@exim.org Subject: Re: [exim] Is DomainsKeys (DK not DKIM) disabled

Re: [exim] listed at .backscatterer.org

2011-08-24 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
-Original Message- From: exim-users-boun...@exim.org [mailto:exim-users-boun...@exim.org] On Behalf Of Craig Whitmore Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2011 8:32 AM To: Oliver Howe; exim-users@exim.org Subject: Re: [exim] listed at .backscatterer.org A mail server should not accept

Re: [exim] SPF checking and type 99 filtering

2011-08-15 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
-Original Message- From: exim-users-boun...@exim.org [mailto:exim-users-boun...@exim.org] On Behalf Of Phil Pennock Sent: Friday, August 12, 2011 2:54 PM To: Christian Gregoire Cc: exim-users@exim.org Subject: Re: [exim] SPF checking and type 99 filtering Not really.

Re: [exim] Re : SPF checking and type 99 filtering

2011-08-15 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
-Original Message- From: Christian Gregoire [mailto:cgregoi...@yahoo.com] Sent: Monday, August 15, 2011 2:25 PM To: Murray S. Kucherawy; exim-users@exim.org Subject: Re : [exim] SPF checking and type 99 filtering But ... in the last end, shouldn't it be Exim's responsability

Re: [exim] How to specify Return-Path for ALL outbound e-mail that go through exim?

2011-07-02 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
-Original Message- From: Ian Eiloart [mailto:i...@sussex.ac.uk] Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 2:57 AM To: Murray S. Kucherawy Cc: Mike Lyon; exim-users@exim.org Subject: Re: [exim] How to specify Return-Path for ALL outbound e-mail that go through exim? It's probably pointless

Re: [exim] How to specify Return-Path for ALL outbound e-mail that go through exim?

2011-06-30 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
-Original Message- From: exim-users-boun...@exim.org [mailto:exim-users-boun...@exim.org] On Behalf Of Ian Eiloart Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 2:34 AM To: Mike Lyon Cc: exim-users@exim.org Subject: Re: [exim] How to specify Return-Path for ALL outbound e-mail that go through

Re: [exim] Configuration question

2011-06-17 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
-Original Message- From: exim-users-boun...@exim.org [mailto:exim-users-boun...@exim.org] On Behalf Of Jan Ingvoldstad Sent: Friday, June 17, 2011 5:51 AM To: Ian Eiloart Cc: exim users Subject: Re: [exim] Configuration question Then I'm confused by Obsoleted by: 5322 at

Re: [exim] DKIM and mailing lists

2011-05-19 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
-Original Message- From: exim-users-boun...@exim.org [mailto:exim-users-boun...@exim.org] On Behalf Of Phil Pennock Sent: Friday, April 15, 2011 12:25 PM To: exim-users@exim.org Subject: Re: [exim] DKIM and mailing lists Ideally, the mailing-list manager's local MTA will verify

Re: [exim] Testing DKIM

2011-05-19 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
-Original Message- From: exim-users-boun...@exim.org [mailto:exim-users-boun...@exim.org] On Behalf Of l.rine...@movimatica.com Sent: Monday, May 09, 2011 11:42 AM To: exim-users@exim.org Subject: [exim] Testing DKIM Using Exim 4.71 on Ubuntu Server 10.04, i'd like to test DKIM

Re: [exim] problem : x-vbr=hardfail

2011-05-12 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
-Original Message- From: exim-users-boun...@exim.org [mailto:exim-users-boun...@exim.org] On Behalf Of Phil Pennock Sent: Sunday, May 08, 2011 7:45 PM To: techni...@dreamhosting.fr Cc: exim users; exim-users-bounces+dreamhosting...@exim.org Subject: Re: [exim] problem :

Re: [exim] Fwd: Re: Testing DKIM

2011-05-12 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
-Original Message- From: exim-users-boun...@exim.org [mailto:exim-users-boun...@exim.org] On Behalf Of Phil Pennock Sent: Monday, May 09, 2011 5:33 PM To: Luciano Rinetti Cc: exim-users@exim.org Subject: Re: [exim] Fwd: Re: Testing DKIM My notes include these DKIM testing

Re: [exim] problem : x-vbr=hardfail

2011-05-12 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
-Original Message- From: Phil Pennock [mailto:p...@exim.org] Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2011 4:14 PM To: Murray S. Kucherawy Cc: exim-users@exim.org; techni...@dreamhosting.fr Subject: Re: [exim] problem : x-vbr=hardfail If absence from a VBR list ever becomes a significant cause

Re: [exim] DKIM signature where the identity field has a leading slash attempts to touch the filesystem

2011-05-03 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
-Original Message- From: exim-users-boun...@exim.org [mailto:exim-users-boun...@exim.org] On Behalf Of Tony Meyer Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 2:25 AM To: exim users Subject: [exim] DKIM signature where the identity field has a leading slash attempts to touch the filesystem Hi,

Re: [exim] Rejecting messages with no To: or Cc: field in the headers

2011-03-01 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
-Original Message- From: Murray S. Kucherawy Sent: Monday, February 28, 2011 6:08 PM To: exim users Subject: RE: [exim] Rejecting messages with no To: or Cc: field in the headers RFC2821 (2001) does a better job, but still not what you're looking for. It says the HELO parameter

Re: [exim] Rejecting messages with no To: or Cc: field in the headers

2011-03-01 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
Sorry for going back a couple of months, but I'm working on an MTA-specific RFC and this caught my attention. -Original Message- From: exim-users-boun...@exim.org [mailto:exim-users-boun...@exim.org] On Behalf Of W B Hacker Sent: Friday, November 19, 2010 3:34 AM To: exim users

Re: [exim] Rejecting messages with no To: or Cc: field in the headers

2011-03-01 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
-Original Message- From: exim-users-boun...@exim.org [mailto:exim-users-boun...@exim.org] On Behalf Of Always Learning Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2011 8:13 AM To: exim users Subject: Re: [exim] Rejecting messages with no To: or Cc: field in the headers In fact, Section 4.1.4 of

Re: [exim] DKIM ADSP (Author Domain Signing Practices) ACL

2011-01-10 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
-Original Message- From: exim-users-boun...@exim.org [mailto:exim-users-boun...@exim.org] On Behalf Of Bryan Rawlins Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 12:45 PM To: exim-users@exim.org Subject: [exim] DKIM ADSP (Author Domain Signing Practices) ACL I've created an ACL to check DKIM

Re: [exim] Handling malformed header fields

2010-10-24 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
-Original Message- From: exim-users-boun...@exim.org [mailto:exim-users-boun...@exim.org] On Behalf Of Andreas Metzler Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2010 1:57 AM To: exim-users@exim.org Subject: Re: [exim] Handling malformed header fields Hi Andreas, In both cases the broken

[exim] Handling malformed header fields

2010-10-23 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
This might be more appropriate for exim-dev, but I'll start here. I'm working on drafting a Best Current Practices RFC for MTA behaviours beyond what the basic message format RFCs require (RFC5322 in particular). I've already queried what Sendmail, postfix and a few commercial MTAs do in some

Re: [exim] How to include transport info

2010-09-30 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
[Todd, you may need to forward this to exim-users for me as I'm not on that list.] -Original Message- From: opendkim-dev-bou...@lists.opendkim.org [mailto:opendkim-dev- bou...@lists.opendkim.org] On Behalf Of Todd Lyons Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 6:45 AM To: