Re: [exim] PLEASE NOTE: Upcoming changes in Let's Encrypt issuer certificates

On Monday, 21 September 2020 6:39:35 PM AEST Jeremy Harris via Exim-users wrote: > On 21/09/2020 09:34, Dan Egli via Exim-users wrote: > > Forgive me for being a bit dense, but I'm new to the SSL world. I have > > certificates by LetsEncrypt, generated about a month ago. Where and how > > do I

Re: [exim] Problem with tls_certificate and multiple domains

On Thursday, 17 October 2019 9:17:04 AM AEDT Viktor Dukhovni via Exim-users wrote: > On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 10:04:16PM +0200, Cyborg via Exim-users wrote: > > Am 16.10.19 um 19:25 schrieb Nospam2k via Exim-users: > > > I want to use > > > mail.hosteddomainone.com for

Re: [exim] Problem with tls_certificate and multiple domains

On 16 October 2019 6:29:29 pm AEDT, Cyborg via Exim-users wrote: > >Nospam2k (Mi 16 Okt 2019 08:05:05 CEST): >>> Perhaps I should go about this a different way. I am going to be >hosting multiple domains. Since it seems that $tls_in_sni is returning >blank and/or can be unreliable, what is

[exim] Obfuscating $authresults

Hi all, I'm looking at the resulting Authentication-Results: header from an $authresults expansion when using smtp auth and it's giving auth=pass (METHOD) smtp.auth=user, or in the case of local submission local=pass (non-smtp, $primaryhostnam) u=user. I was wondering if it would be possible to

Re: [exim] New compromise...?

On 25 September 2019 8:11:10 pm AEST, Julian Bradfield via Exim-users wrote: >On 2019-09-25, Sebastian Nielsen via Exim-users >wrote: >> list of CIDR ranges that your country, or even better, your company, >uses. >> >> If different users belong to different countries, for example if you >run

Re: [exim] no DMARC?

On Saturday, 27 October 2018 12:33:04 PM AEDT Heiko Schlittermann via Exim- users wrote: > wido.exim--- via Exim-users (Do 25 Okt 2018 17:30:58 CEST): > > Hi, > > > > I am running an Ubuntu 18.04 machine and I am trying to get DMARC > > working on my Exim. Therefor I have grabbed the Exim

Re: [exim] Tarpit SPAM valid in this day in age.

On 10 December 2018 8:42:12 pm AEDT, Brent Clark via Exim-users wrote: >Good day Guys > >Just something I thought I would like to double check with the >community. > >I am part of a team that has inherited some mail servers, and going >through the Exim config, we are seeing some very old

Re: [exim] Tarpit SPAM valid in this day in age.

On 10 December 2018 8:42:12 pm AEDT, Brent Clark via Exim-users wrote: >Good day Guys > >Just something I thought I would like to double check with the >community. > >I am part of a team that has inherited some mail servers, and going >through the Exim config, we are seeing some very old

Re: [exim] Strange issue with DMARC

On 30 November 2018 3:10:26 am AEDT, Odhiambo Washington via Exim-users wrote: >I have configured DMARC for one of the domains I manage, and all the >tools >I used for testing gave me the all clear. I then decided to use the >REJECT >policy. >Today, I was testing the implementation of DMARC

Re: [exim] How multi-recipient messages are handled?

On Sunday, 18 November 2018 11:50:54 AM AEDT Aki Kyo via Exim-users wrote: > Hi, I have a question about handling messages with multiple recipients in > Exim. > > I want to run something like rspamd and apply per-user spam filtering, > which means multiple recipients might have different spam

Re: [exim] DKIM signing for multiple domains

On Friday, 28 September 2018 2:19:10 PM AEST Odhiambo Washington wrote: > On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 at 08:47, Richard James Salts via Exim-users < > > exim-users@exim.org> wrote: > > On Tuesday, 25 September 2018 10:28:42 AM AEST Odhiambo Washington via > > Exim-users > &

Re: [exim] DKIM signing for multiple domains

On Tuesday, 25 September 2018 10:28:42 AM AEST Odhiambo Washington via Exim-users wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I have multiple domains hosted on the same server. They are virtual > domains. The server has just one IP address and one Exim instance. > I am wondering how to easily do DKIM signing for

Re: [exim] DKIM signing options - specially list of headers

On Tuesday, 31 July 2018 9:26:15 PM AEST Jeremy Harris via Exim-users wrote: > On 07/31/2018 12:08 PM, Graeme Fowler via Exim-users wrote: > > X-Mailman-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; > > > > c=relaxed/relaxed; > > d=open-t.co.uk; s=20170820;

Re: [exim] Filtering DKIM domains

On Monday, 12 February 2018 10:17:43 AM AEDT AC via Exim-users wrote: > I'm receiving a fair amount of spam that is coming through Microsoft's > Office 365 service (spammers signing up for the one month free trial of > Office 365). This provides them a DKIM siguature that is valid and has > a

Re: [exim] Implementation of SPF - flaw?

On 25 September 2017 18:26:27 CEST, Hardy wrote: >On 25.09.2017 14:45, Heiko Schlittermann via Exim-users wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Hardy (Mo 25 Sep 2017 09:17:34 CEST): >>> Hi, and clearly does not include localhost. So passing messags from localhost

Re: [exim] EBL: blacklist for email addresses in Reply-To and message bodies

On 29/06/17 21:59, Lena--- via Exim-users wrote: The Reply-To: header takes an address-list and is interpreted as such, and IIRC used in that way by some mail-clients when subscribed to mailing-lists but wanting personal copies of replies too. So the `rt:` ACL is going to calculate something

Re: [exim] Calling a PERL script

On 09/06/17 01:29, Jerry Stuckle wrote: Probably not rejections, but possibly slowness (e.g. https://serverfault.com/ questions/350023/tc-ingress-policing-and-ifb-mirroring to limit the rate they can send to 300 bit/s or something). One can only hope :) Jerry No, I don't believe it was

Re: [exim] Calling a PERL script

On Thursday, 8 June 2017 9:21:21 AM AEST Jerry Stuckle wrote: > On 6/8/2017 4:54 AM, Graeme Fowler via Exim-users wrote: > > On 7 Jun 2017, at 22:12, Jerry Stuckle > wrote: > >> Yes, I understand that. But there isn't much I can do if the

Re: [exim] DMARC spf_domain= empty

On 01/06/17 01:02, Niels Dettenbach via Exim-users wrote: Am Mittwoch, 31. Mai 2017, 14:50:16 CEST schrieb Jeremy Harris: /* Use the envelope sender domain for this part of DMARC */ spf_sender_domain = expand_string(US"$sender_address_domain"); It's using $sender_address_domain - so what was