email
gateway and exim had actually gotten the silly thing to work, and if so,
how? Not much information to be found via google on this either.
Thanks.
--
Vincent Danen @ http://linsec.ca/
pgpFpO1RqlMiE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim
, but other
than that it needs to remain largely intact.
Thanks for any pointers. Sorry if this is a pretty dumb question.
--
Vincent Danen @ http://linsec.ca/
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki
. I'll have to look into that. I wasn't aware
there were tools like that. =)
--
Vincent Danen @ http://linsec.ca/
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
* W B Hacker [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-02-02 05:05:34 +0800]:
I read the RCPT delays and PIPELINING thread with much interest after
I wrote my last message on this where it seems that pipelining is being
the culprit here. I have no idea how their server is setup, but seems
like there are
* Philip Hazel [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-02-02 10:29:07 +]:
Looks like I might have to wait for the new version of exim to do this.
I set:
pipelining_advertise_hosts = 127.0.0.1
smtp_enforce_sync = true
but on outgoing connections if the remote advertises pipelining, seems
* Peter Bowyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-01-31 20:49:49 +]:
Not really sure why unless it's doing a sender verify and is timing out
because the telnet to it worked fine.
There's a suspicious delay after 'RCPT TO' in their SMTP dialogue -
probably is a callout. Try a different MAIL FROM
* W B Hacker [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-02-01 12:06:29 +0800]:
Peter Bowyer wrote:
On 31/01/07, Vincent Danen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not really sure why unless it's doing a sender verify and is timing out
because the telnet to it worked fine.
There's a suspicious delay after 'RCPT
* Peter Bowyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-02-01 07:44:31 +]:
Not really sure why unless it's doing a sender verify and is timing out
because the telnet to it worked fine.
There's a suspicious delay after 'RCPT TO' in their SMTP dialogue -
probably is a callout. Try a different
* W B Hacker [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-02-02 02:53:15 +0800]:
Vincent Danen wrote:
* Peter Bowyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-02-01 07:44:31 +]:
Not really sure why unless it's doing a sender verify and is timing out
because the telnet to it worked fine.
There's a suspicious delay after
* Vincent Danen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-02-01 11:49:06 -0700]:
Can you tell what MTA they are using?
Yeah, they're using exim 4.63 (I'm using 4.5x). I thought it would be a
sender-verification request too, but that doesn't explain why it worked
with the telnet test but fails when
I'm a little bit stumped on this one:
2007-01-28 10:19:23 1HBDbg-00013F-1T TLS error on connection to hostgator.com
[67.18.54.2]: SSL_connect timed out
2007-01-28 10:19:23 1HBDbg-00013F-1T TLS session failure: delivering
unencrypted to hostgator.com [67.18.54.2] (not in hosts_require_tls)
...
* Graeme Fowler [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-01-31 19:03:14 +]:
I'm a little bit stumped on this one:
2007-01-28 10:19:23 1HBDbg-00013F-1T TLS error on connection to
hostgator.com [67.18.54.2]: SSL_connect timed out
2007-01-28 10:19:23 1HBDbg-00013F-1T TLS session failure: delivering
* W B Hacker [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-10-29 02:56:29 +0800]:
So, frankly, unless you have some pointers (which is what I asked for),
you can keep your personal opinions to yourself.
Thanks.
Well - at least our advice was *polite*, based on actual experience, not
hearsay
or
Has anyone setup TMDA with exim using virtual hosts? For instance, I
have my virtual users setup as /srv/mail/[domain]/[user] and want to use
TMDA and per-virtual-user configurations (ie. each user has a Maildir so
I'd like the TMDA configs to be in /srv/mail/[domain]/[user]/.tmda/). I
plan to
* W B Hacker [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-10-29 02:20:25 +0800]:
Marc Sherman wrote:
Vincent Danen wrote:
Any tips would be appreciated.
Don't use TMDA. It creates collateral spam.
- Marc
Worse than that.
We tried it. And removed it.
What do you tell a client who has failed
* Philip Hazel [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-05-19 09:25:26 +0100]:
Well, a raw count from the spec reached 117 lines*, but
1. Some of those could be omitted as being things that one would never
type successfully at the command line--they are used internally when Exim
execs itself.
* Marc Sherman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-05-19 12:34:59 -0400]:
I certainly don't want to force you to include it in exim proper, but I
think it would be useful for myself and the Annvix OS which I'm
developing.
If you do that, make sure you add a line to the top of the --help output
* John W. Baxter [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-05-18 15:59:56 -0700]:
I don't think it would be hundreds of lines.
Well, a raw count from the spec reached 117 lines*, but
1. Some of those could be omitted as being things that one would never
type successfully at the command line--they are
I swear that I recall exim used to have a --help or equivalent, but when
I try to do exim --help or even exim --version I get nothing.
Was this removed? I thought I saw it in previous versions, but even
4.54 does the same thing.
Sorry if this is a stupid question.
--
Annvix - Secure Linux
* W B Hacker [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-04-16 06:33:32 +0800]:
If I'm mail and I run sudo it asks for the root password. What do I need
to add to get around that?
See NOPASSWD in man sudoers.
regards,
John
??
Is that a good idea?
I think I am beginning to see why some folks say
* Casey Allen Shobe [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-02-21 13:35:15 +]:
This is good to hear. My suggestion to Casey then would be to maybe
invesigate socklog as a replacement for syslogd and grab the mail.*
facility and put into an exim logging dir or something (which now that I
know can be
for
the reasons stated above.
On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, Vincent Danen wrote:
Quite frankly, if exim can log both to a file and to syslog, then I can
make socklog handle the keepable logs and keep a single today log
written by exim itself for the sole purpose of tracking stats.
Exim *can* log both
* Casey Allen Shobe [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-02-16 01:38:13 +]:
On Wednesday 15 February 2006 21:08, Jakob Hirsch wrote:
I doubt that you really want to log to stdout. tcpserver would send that
to the remote end.
Umm, no. I'm not using tcpserver. And I said stderr/stdout in the
23 matches
Mail list logo
