Re: [exim] [OT] Stupid spammers

2009-02-18 Thread W B Hacker
Ted Cooper wrote: > W B Hacker wrote: >> Yawn.. I think one of my adresses gets no more spam now than it did >> a dozen years ago... >> >> OTOH, even an alleged NDR won't get past acl_smtp_connect if is has no >> PTR RR. >> >> I *do* get one heck of a lot more connection *attempts* than

Re: [exim] [OT] Stupid spammers

2009-02-18 Thread Ted Cooper
W B Hacker wrote: > Yawn.. I think one of my adresses gets no more spam now than it did > a dozen years ago... > > OTOH, even an alleged NDR won't get past acl_smtp_connect if is has no > PTR RR. > > I *do* get one heck of a lot more connection *attempts* than 1,000 a > day. Or hour.

Re: [exim] [OT] Stupid spammers

2009-02-18 Thread W B Hacker
Ted Cooper wrote: > windy_1 wrote: >> We have a home school project web site for kids ages 6 to 14 and get over >> 500 spam a day, most totally inappropriate for kids. We had to add parents to >> filter the mail. In my opinion it is beyond sick. They have all these stupid >> laws about "child saf

Re: [exim] [OT] Stupid spammers

2009-02-18 Thread Ted Cooper
windy_1 wrote: > We have a home school project web site for kids ages 6 to 14 and get over > 500 spam a day, most totally inappropriate for kids. We had to add parents to > filter the mail. In my opinion it is beyond sick. They have all these stupid > laws about "child safe content" but they don'

Re: [exim] [OT] Stupid spammers

2009-02-18 Thread Yan Seiner
On Wed, February 18, 2009 4:15 pm, windy_1 wrote: > We have a home school project web site for kids ages 6 to 14 and get > over > 500 spam a day, most totally inappropriate for kids. We had to add parents > to > filter the mail. In my opinion it is beyond sick. They have all these > stupid > law

Re: [exim] [OT] Stupid spammers

2009-02-18 Thread jean-paul
most of the bounces could be eliminated with a sa filter in place- do you have the ability to put one in? Jean-Paul Natola > From: wind...@skyhighway.com > To: exim-users@exim.org > Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:15:44 -0800 > Subject: Re: [exim] [OT] Stu

Re: [exim] [OT] Stupid spammers

2009-02-18 Thread windy_1
We have a home school project web site for kids ages 6 to 14 and get over 500 spam a day, most totally inappropriate for kids. We had to add parents to filter the mail. In my opinion it is beyond sick. They have all these stupid laws about "child safe content" but they don't give a hoot about som

[exim] [OT] Stupid spammers

2009-02-18 Thread Ted Cooper
Did anyone else just get spammed by a SEO company offering to increase the nabble website ranking? :P I'll be hunting down all of their domains and name servers later to block them forever. Time to cycle my email address again. -- The Exim Manual http://www.exim.org/docs.html http://docs.exim.o