On 3/24/2011 12:13 PM, Zoe (Medway Hosting) wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Marc Perkel"
To: "Dave Restall - System Administrator,,,"
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2011 6:40 PM
Subject: Re: [exim] A cry for help - are there any plusnet admins out there
?
Hi
On 3/25/2011 9:59 AM, Mark Goodge wrote:
On 25/03/2011 16:49, Marc Perkel wrote:
SAV is similar in that it is useful to determine if the sender is coming
from a bogus email address. I do respect the argument that it creates
some traffic. But SPF calls also create some traffic as well so if
yo
On 25/03/2011 16:49, Marc Perkel wrote:
SAV is similar in that it is useful to determine if the sender is coming
from a bogus email address. I do respect the argument that it creates
some traffic. But SPF calls also create some traffic as well so if
you're on the Internet you'll be putting out d
On 3/24/2011 3:07 PM, Heiko Schlittermann wrote:
Hello,
Dave Restall - System Administrator,,, (Thu Mar 24 15:50:22
2011):
I use exim to receive and process my emails - have done for years.
I also use sender callouts - have done for years. Occasionally emails
get rejected because they are
--On 24 March 2011 14:50:22 + "Dave Restall - System Administrator,,,"
wrote:
Hi,
I use exim to receive and process my emails - have done for years.
I also use sender callouts - have done for years. Occasionally emails
get rejected because they are sent from non-existent addresses and
Dave Restall - System Administrator,,, wrote:
Hi,
Guys - please step back a bit - my original email was not intended to
start a flame war on the merits of sender callouts. Please keep the
discord to yourselves and think twice. Most of you seem to have latched
onto the sender callouts and focus
Hi,
Guys - please step back a bit - my original email was not intended to
start a flame war on the merits of sender callouts. Please keep the
discord to yourselves and think twice. Most of you seem to have latched
onto the sender callouts and focussed on that, nobody has commented on
whether I s
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 02:50:22PM +, Dave Restall - System
Administrator,,, wrote:
> I use exim to receive and process my emails - have done for years.
> I also use sender callouts - have done for years. Occasionally emails
> get rejected because they are sent from non-existent addresses and
Heiko Schlittermann wrote:
Hello,
Dave Restall - System Administrator,,, (Thu Mar 24 15:50:22
2011):
I use exim to receive and process my emails - have done for years.
I also use sender callouts - have done for years. Occasionally emails
get rejected because they are sent from non-existent a
- Original Message -
From: "Marc Perkel"
To: "Dave Restall - System Administrator,,,"
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2011 6:40 PM
Subject: Re: [exim] A cry for help - are there any plusnet admins out there
?
> Hi Dave,
>
> I understand your frustratio
- Original Message -
From: "Heiko Schlittermann"
To:
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2011 10:07 PM
Subject: Re: [exim] A cry for help - are there any plusnet admins out there
?
> But as mentioned in the other answers, it's a quite "religious" issue
Religion has
Hello,
Dave Restall - System Administrator,,, (Thu Mar 24 15:50:22
2011):
> I use exim to receive and process my emails - have done for years.
> I also use sender callouts - have done for years. Occasionally emails
> get rejected because they are sent from non-existent addresses and sender
> ca
On 25/03/11 00:50, Dave Restall - System Administrator,,, wrote:
> What are the current RFC's regarding
> good mail server etiquette ?
Don't do sender callouts. It's abusive and causes more problems than it
solves.
I was the lucky recipient of several DDoS as a result of Joe Jobs at
some very sma
Hi Dave,
I understand your frustrations dealing the the brain dead. What I do is
have a text file with a list of domains not to verify and that solves
the problem. You can also push sender verification down your list of
tests so you do less of it. For example, I do my blacklist tests,
whiteli
On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 15:40 +, Drav Sloan wrote:
> The simplest fix for this is exempt PlusNet from your callouts
Indeed; I missed putting this paragraph in my message:
The path of least resistance is to do as Plusnet suggest - whitelist
their outbound mailhosts. You can still spam scan, but
Dave Restall - System Administrator,,, wrote:
> I use exim to receive and process my emails - have done for years.
> I also use sender callouts - have done for years. Occasionally emails
> get rejected because they are sent from non-existent addresses and sender
> callouts don't like that.
You'll
On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 14:50 +, Dave Restall - System
Administrator,,, wrote:
> I use exim to receive and process my emails - have done for years.
> I also use sender callouts - have done for years. Occasionally emails
> get rejected because they are sent from non-existent addresses and sender
Hi,
I use exim to receive and process my emails - have done for years.
I also use sender callouts - have done for years. Occasionally emails
get rejected because they are sent from non-existent addresses and sender
callouts don't like that.
Recently plusnet (www.plus.net) (an ISP !!!) sent me so
18 matches
Mail list logo
