Re: [exim] Callout defer (was: Taint checking and exim 4.96rc0)

2022-05-02 Thread Slavko via Exim-users
Hi, Dňa Sun, 1 May 2022 15:49:01 +0100 Jeremy Harris via Exim-users napísal: > For instance, I have: Thanks, seems to be better than the one of which i am aware, as callout is doing only once. > > cannot distinguish network vs. real temporary errors > > That's true. You might be able to

Re: [exim] Callout defer (was: Taint checking and exim 4.96rc0)

2022-05-01 Thread Jeremy Harris via Exim-users
On 01/05/2022 15:16, Slavko via Exim-users wrote: will be appropriate $*_data variables filled on defer result with defer_ok option? I mean in case, when callout do not fail due network errors. No. + without defer_ok, on any defer reason the ACL immediately returns defer result and one

Re: [exim] Callout defer (was: Taint checking and exim 4.96rc0)

2022-05-01 Thread Slavko via Exim-users
Ahoj, Dňa Sun, 1 May 2022 11:54:32 +0100 Jeremy Harris via Exim-users napísal: > On 30/04/2022 12:04, Slavko via Exim-users wrote: > >> That's worthy of consideration; thank you for the idea. > >> Essentially, it would be treating a backend MTA as a trusted DB > >> for lookup. > > Committed