> On 18 Nov 2021, at 16:53, Matt Corallo via Exim-users
> wrote:
>
> Same, I'd think, but according to the SpamAssassin folks its incorrect.
> According to them, a Received line like the following indicates that the host
> was *not* verified, but Exim seems to have fully verified the
On 19/11/2021 00:18, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users wrote:
> "Received: "
> "${if def:sender_rcvhost {from $sender_rcvhost\n\t}"
> "{${if def:sender_ident {from ${quote_local_part:$sender_ident} }}"
> "${if def:sender_helo_name {(helo=$sender_helo_name)\n\t"
One thing
On 2021-11-18 at 17:16:14 UTC-0500 (Thu, 18 Nov 2021 22:16:14 +)
Jeremy Harris via Exim-users
is rumored to have said:
On 18/11/2021 19:10, Bill Cole via Exim-users wrote:
Also welcome, short of a patch, would be clues about how to detect in
an Exim-written Received header when a SMTP
On 18/11/2021 23:05, Bill Cole via Exim-users wrote:
Checks of the peer IP against a hostlist item which is a name
will cause one, as will matching the host_lookup option or
an explicit verify=reverse_host_lookup ACL condition.
So, if none of that happens, what will the Received header look
On 18/11/2021 19:10, Bill Cole via Exim-users wrote:
Also welcome, short of a patch, would be clues about how to detect in an
Exim-written Received header when a SMTP client IP has no rDNS or the rDNS name
doesn't resolve to the client IP.
It would be more reliable to interpret an
On 2021-11-18 at 09:53:38 UTC-0500 (Thu, 18 Nov 2021 09:53:38 -0500)
Matt Corallo via Exim-users
is rumored to have said:
Same, I'd think, but according to the SpamAssassin folks its
incorrect.
I do not think that anyone involved with the SA project said anything
Exim did was "incorrect."
On 11/17/21 11:56, Heiko Schlittermann via Exim-users wrote:
Heiko Schlittermann via Exim-users (Mi 17 Nov 2021
13:17:33 CET):
Typo? What do you mean with "sender_rcvhost"?
Mea culpa. You're talking about the variable to be expanded inside the
Received header.
But given this, I still
On 18/11/2021 14:53, Matt Corallo via Exim-users wrote:
Received: from o13.mailer.shopify.com ([149.72.221.62])
by mail.as397444.net with esmtps TLS1.3 id 1mmjFb-0034Ki-02
(envelope-from
)
for vmstfp...@mattcorallo.com; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 21:10:54 +
Specifically, it seems
Heiko Schlittermann via Exim-users (Mi 17 Nov 2021
13:17:33 CET):
> Typo? What do you mean with "sender_rcvhost"?
Mea culpa. You're talking about the variable to be expanded inside the
Received header.
But given this, I still can't see any issue with the logs you provided.
--
Heiko
Matt Corallo via Exim-users (Di 16 Nov 2021 17:47:22 CET):
> Like the title says, for some reason exim 4.94.2-7 (Debian stable) is
> refusing to ever expand sender_rcvhost to a verified hostname. The below
Typo? What do you mean with "sender_rcvhost"?
> shows a simple email inbound from github,
On 2021-11-16 at 17:03:14 UTC-0500 (Wed, 17 Nov 2021 01:03:14 +0300)
Evgeniy Berdnikov via Exim-users
is rumored to have said:
On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 03:11:50PM -0500, Matt Corallo via Exim-users
wrote:
The way I was (apparently incorrectly?) interpreting a similar
expansion
here is that the
On 11/16/21 17:03, Evgeniy Berdnikov via Exim-users wrote:
On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 03:11:50PM -0500, Matt Corallo via Exim-users wrote:
The way I was (apparently incorrectly?) interpreting a similar expansion
here is that the host was not verified via FcRDNS due to the presence of the
square
On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 03:11:50PM -0500, Matt Corallo via Exim-users wrote:
> The way I was (apparently incorrectly?) interpreting a similar expansion
> here is that the host was not verified via FcRDNS due to the presence of the
> square brackets in the parenthetical. Apparently that is the way
On 11/16/21 13:47, Evgeniy Berdnikov via Exim-users wrote:
Hello.
On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 11:47:22AM -0500, Matt Corallo via Exim-users wrote:
Like the title says, for some reason exim 4.94.2-7 (Debian stable) is
refusing to ever expand sender_rcvhost to a verified hostname.
Your
Hello.
On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 11:47:22AM -0500, Matt Corallo via Exim-users wrote:
> Like the title says, for some reason exim 4.94.2-7 (Debian stable) is
> refusing to ever expand sender_rcvhost to a verified hostname.
Your mail passed my relay with Exim 4.94.2-7 (frozen good old version)
Like the title says, for some reason exim 4.94.2-7 (Debian stable) is refusing to ever expand
sender_rcvhost to a verified hostname. The below shows a simple email inbound from github, as well
as the relevant DNS traffic from exim to the DNS server (with spamd stopped to ensure we're not
16 matches
Mail list logo
