Re: [exim] Exim usage numbers?

2019-09-08 Thread Bill Cole via Exim-users
On 7 Sep 2019, at 7:10, Graeme Fowler via Exim-users wrote: On 7 Sep 2019, at 11:13, Cyborg via Exim-users wrote: The question is, what is the reality? Nobody really knows. The fact that Exim is/was the default MTA in a couple of distros means there’s an awful lot of systems running it

Re: [exim] Exim usage numbers?

2019-09-07 Thread Olaf Hopp via Exim-users
On 9/7/19 12:13 PM, Cyborg via Exim-users wrote: Hi, several press publications about the exim exploit give different exim installation numbers. The Hacker News: "...which runs almost 60% of the internet's email servers today..."     "...leaving at least over half

Re: [exim] Exim usage numbers?

2019-09-07 Thread Andreas Metzler via Exim-users
On 2019-09-07 Cyborg via Exim-users wrote: > several press publications about the exim exploit give different exim > installation numbers. > The Hacker News: "...which runs almost 60% of the internet's email > servers today..." >     "...leaving at least over half a

Re: [exim] Exim usage numbers?

2019-09-07 Thread Graeme Fowler via Exim-users
On 7 Sep 2019, at 11:13, Cyborg via Exim-users wrote: > The question is, what is the reality? Nobody really knows. The fact that Exim is/was the default MTA in a couple of distros means there’s an awful lot of systems running it out there. But… nobody really knows for sure. Graeme -- ##

[exim] Exim usage numbers?

2019-09-07 Thread Cyborg via Exim-users
Hi, several press publications about the exim exploit give different exim installation numbers. The Hacker News: "...which runs almost 60% of the internet's email servers today..."     "...leaving at least over half a million email servers vulnerable to remote