Viktor Dukhovni via Exim-users wrote:
>> On Jun 27, 2019, at 5:58 AM, Richard Jones via Exim-users
>> wrote:
>> There have been a few mails about this recently, but I don't think they
>> cover my case (nor is this about my previous mail about retry times)
> There was a recent thread that's an
On 28/06/2019 15:50, Richard Jones via Exim-users wrote:
> Is this the expected behaviour?
If you're wanting to affect the behaviour of Exim sending messages,
yes, the relevant configuration goes on the transport.
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinf
On Jun 28, Antoine via Exim-users wrote
> -VERS-TLS1.3
Thanks Antoine, but that doesn't seem to work:
$ gnutls-cli -l --priority SECURE256:-VERS-TLS1.3
Cipher suites for SECURE256:-VERS-TLS1.3
TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 0xc0, 0x2c TLS1.2
TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_CHACHA20_
On 28/06/2019 14:50, Richard Jones via Exim-users wrote:
> Thanks Viktor, and also for your other response. I don't suppose you
> know the magic priority string to stop this? I've had a read through the
> gnutls pages on the subject, but it's not obvious how to disable TLSv1.3
> ("!VERS-TLS1.3" doe
On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 02:50:25PM +0100, Richard Jones via Exim-users wrote:
> On Jun 27, Viktor Dukhovni via Exim-users wrote
> > Which is exactly this. IIRC there's a recent Exim patch, or you
> > can disable TLS 1.3, or switch to Exim built with OpenSSL.
>
> Thanks Viktor, and also for your
On 28/06/2019 15:50, Richard Jones via Exim-users wrote:
> On Jun 27, Viktor Dukhovni via Exim-users wrote
>> Which is exactly this. IIRC there's a recent Exim patch, or you
>> can disable TLS 1.3, or switch to Exim built with OpenSSL.
> Thanks Viktor, and also for your other response. I don't
On Jun 27, Viktor Dukhovni via Exim-users wrote
> Which is exactly this. IIRC there's a recent Exim patch, or you
> can disable TLS 1.3, or switch to Exim built with OpenSSL.
Thanks Viktor, and also for your other response. I don't suppose you
know the magic priority string to stop this? I've had
On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 04:44:33PM +0100, Richard Jones via Exim-users wrote:
> On Jun 27, Niels Dettenbach wrote
> > Relaying to GMail from "unknown third party" SMTP servers could be very
> > limited / "downslowed" by different "temp avail" strategies. Google offers
> > a
> > "postmaster tool
On Jun 27, Niels Dettenbach wrote
> Relaying to GMail from "unknown third party" SMTP servers could be very
> limited / "downslowed" by different "temp avail" strategies. Google offers a
> "postmaster tool" which seem to shift reputation of "registered" SMTP
> Servers:
> https://www.gmail.com/p
> On Jun 27, 2019, at 5:58 AM, Richard Jones via Exim-users
> wrote:
>
> There have been a few mails about this recently, but I don't think they
> cover my case (nor is this about my previous mail about retry times)
There was a recent thread that's an excellent match, that reported
unexpected
Hello all!
There have been a few mails about this recently, but I don't think they
cover my case (nor is this about my previous mail about retry times)
I've sent a mail sent to my gmail account which is just sat in the
queue, attempts to other gmail accounts fail similarly. Here's the short
versi
11 matches
Mail list logo
