This one also produces /dev/random entropy from the sound card:
http://code.google.com/p/snd-egd/
Plug an old FM tuner, without aerial connected, to the sound card for a
useful source of noise ;-)
Mike
On 13/04/2012 08:11, Mark Elkins wrote:
One more - which appears to work for me in gene
On Fri, April 13, 2012 1:09 am, Sven Hartge wrote:
>
> I recommend using haveged:
> http://www.issihosts.com/haveged/
I installed this and the problem has not reappeared. Hopefully that
should fix it.
--
On two occasions I have been asked,—"Pray, Mr. Babbage, if you put into
the machine w
"Martin Schuster (IFKL IT OS DS CD)" wrote:
> On 2012-04-12 16:52, Yan Seiner wrote:
> Phil already made some good suggestions, some additional ideas:
> If you don't care about the quality of the RNG, you could just inject
> data from /dev/urandom into your entropy-pool:
> rngd -r /dev/urandom
On 2012-04-13 at 11:20 +0200, Heiko Schlittermann wrote:
> On Linux we solved the entropy issue using the rng-tools package and put
> there "/dev/urandom" as source for additional entropy.
That's not really solving the problem. That's fooling the system into
thinking there's more entropy than the
Yan Seiner (Do 12 Apr 2012 16:52:08 CEST):
>
> Seems to be a TLS entropy issue? (I'm guessing here but from reading what
> I've been able to it looks similar.)
>
> Yesterday the messages were persisting for hours, and there was upwards of
> 100 stalled at a time.
>
> Not sure what I can do to
And another entropy source - not tried it myself, but heard good things
about it:-
http://www.entropykey.co.uk/
Nigel.
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http:/
One more - which appears to work for me in generating DNSSEC
signatures just fills up /dev/random (and I've no idea if this will
help?)
Install the 'haveged' package, www.irisa.fr/caps/projects/hipsor
Software that reads random stuff from your CPU. Not as good as real
Hardware Entropy devices
On 2012-04-12 16:52, Yan Seiner wrote:
> [...]
> Not sure what I can do to help the entropy issue. It may just be that
> I've had a huge rsync job running for days and if it's using the same pool
> it could be draining all the entropy faster than the system can generate
> it. I don't know enough
On 2012-04-12 at 07:52 -0700, Yan Seiner wrote:
> Seems to be a TLS entropy issue? (I'm guessing here but from reading what
> I've been able to it looks similar.)
>
> Yesterday the messages were persisting for hours, and there was upwards of
> 100 stalled at a time.
>
> Not sure what I can do to
On Wed, April 11, 2012 10:39 pm, Phil Pennock wrote:
> On 2012-04-11 at 13:26 -0700, Yan Seiner wrote:
>> 2012-04-11 13:22:16 1SI3wt-0006jb-DK Spool file is locked (another
>> process
>> is handling this message)
>
> Run "exiwhat", it will tell you which Exim processes exist, what they're
> curren
On 2012-04-11 at 13:26 -0700, Yan Seiner wrote:
> 2012-04-11 13:22:16 1SI3wt-0006jb-DK Spool file is locked (another process
> is handling this message)
Run "exiwhat", it will tell you which Exim processes exist, what they're
currently doing, etc.
Usually this message just means that there's a sl
I just started getting this message. Seems that many emails (but not all)
are getting hung up.
2012-04-11 13:22:16 1SI3wt-0006jb-DK Spool file is locked (another process
is handling this message)
I have no idea why this started happening; I've checked all the usual
suspects and I have plenty of s
Marc Sherman wrote am 30.09.2005 15:45, Uhr:
Oliver Kötter wrote:
OK, from what I understand exim trys to encrypt that message or
something from that communication to the destination server? But why
do all other outgoing mail addresses work? Is there a way to tell
exim not to encrypt anything
On Fri, 30 Sep 2005 14:09:27 +0200 (CEST), Oliver Kötter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>OK, from what I understand exim trys to encrypt that message or something from
>that communication
>to the destination server?
Yes. Exim uses TLS automatically if the remote host advertises
STARTTLS.
>But why do
Oliver Kötter wrote:
OK, from what I understand exim trys to encrypt that message or
something from that communication to the destination server? But why
do all other outgoing mail addresses work? Is there a way to tell
exim not to encrypt anything?
Tony already gave you the answer for how to
On Fri, 30 Sep 2005, Oliver Kötter wrote:
>
> Is there a way to tell exim not to encrypt anything?
hosts_avoid_tls = *
Tony.
--
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://dotat.at/ ${sg{\N${sg{\
N\}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}}\
\N}{([^N]*)(.)(
Marc Haber schrieb:
>>It says 0 :-( I guess that is not good?
>
> It's good in a way that we now know what is going on on your system,
> but bad in a way that there is no easy way to fix it.
>
> To establish a cryptographically protected connection, exim (or GnuTLS
> in the case of Debian's exim p
On Fri, 30 Sep 2005 10:53:31 +0200 (CEST), Oliver Kötter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Marc Haber schrieb:
>> On Fri, 30 Sep 2005 09:53:04 +0200 (CEST), Oliver Kötter
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>Any other info that could be of any use?
>>
>> What does cat /proc/sys/kernel/random/entropy_avail sa
Marc Haber schrieb:
> On Fri, 30 Sep 2005 09:53:04 +0200 (CEST), Oliver Kötter
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>Any other info that could be of any use?
>
> What does cat /proc/sys/kernel/random/entropy_avail say?
OK, now my linux knowledge ends ;-) what does that mean?
www:~# cat /proc/sys/kerne
On Fri, 30 Sep 2005 09:53:04 +0200 (CEST), Oliver Kötter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Any other info that could be of any use?
What does cat /proc/sys/kernel/random/entropy_avail say?
Greetings
Marc
--
-- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -
Marc Haber
Marc Sherman wrote:
> Here you're definitely obfuscating.
OK, sorry, I really should have read your netiquette... so here is is once
again, I obfuscated the
LHS of the mail addresses (xxx), I guess that's ok because I and my brother do
not want to get
spammed ;-) (it's my brothers mail address I
Oliver Kötter wrote:
2005-09-28 18:07:28 1EKeSt-0001ZE-Sw <= [EMAIL PROTECTED]
H=dsl-084-060-040-005.arcor-ip.net
([192.168.1.75]) [84.60.40.5] P=esmtpa A=cram_md5_server:oliver S=609
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ host mydomain.cc
;; Warning: ID mismatch: expected ID 35399, got 44095
> exigrep 1EKeSt-0001ZE-Sw /var/log/exim4/mainlog*
ups, logs were mixed up in my previous mail, mainlog.1 was after mainlog, so
please watch the time...
--
Oliver Kötter
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please
Marc Sherman schrieb:
>> The mainlog says: 2005-09-29 02:09:29 1EKeSt-0001ZE-Sw Spool file is
>> locked (another process is handling this message)
>
> That's not all the mainlog says. Use exigrep to find all the mainlog
> messages so we can see how the message got into this state in the first
> p
Oliver Kötter wrote:
Everything works fine for some months now, but since last week I am
unable to send mails to one specific guy. When I type "mailq" I see
these mails which do not get send. I am able to send mail to any
other address I have tested.
The mainlog says: 2005-09-29 02:09:29 1EKeSt
Oliver Kötter wrote:
> The mainlog says:
> 2005-09-29 02:09:29 1EKeSt-0001ZE-Sw Spool file is locked (another process is
> handling this
> message)
>
> which is of course repeated every 30 seconds.
Sorry, of course it is repeated every 30 _minutes_
Oliver
--
## List details at http://www.exi
Oliver Kötter wrote:
> The mainlog says:
> 2005-09-29 02:09:29 1EKeSt-0001ZE-Sw Spool file is locked (another process is
> handling this
message)
>
> which is of course repeated every 30 seconds.
Sorry, of course it is repeated every 30 _minutes_
Oliver
--
Oliver Kötter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I am relatively new to exim and have a big problem.
I am using Exim 4.50 on Debian Sarge on my personal mail server which is a
virtual server. It is
the exim4-daemon-heavy package.
Everything works fine for some months now, but since last week I am unable to
send mails to one
specific guy.
28 matches
Mail list logo
