On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 23:36:26 + Graeme Fowler via Exim-users wrote:
[we do hatez the mangling and inability to just reply to this ML anymore]
> On 12 Feb 2019, at 21:56, Sebastian Nielsen via Exim-users
> wrote:
> > I disagree with this. So many organizations that have had softfail for
> >
On 12 Feb 2019, at 21:56, Sebastian Nielsen via Exim-users
wrote:
> I disagree with this. So many organizations that have had softfail for
> several tens of years for no apparent reason. Gmail is no exception.
There’s no way in the SPF definition to indicate “apparent reason”.
You either have
> However do please be cautious about denying messages that only softfail.
I disagree with this. So many organizations that have had softfail for
several tens of years for no apparent reason. Gmail is no exception.
-
C:\Users\Sebastian Nielsen>nslookup -type=TXT gmail.com
Server:
Hi, Emanuel -
On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 at 15:42, Emanuel Gonzalez via Exim-users <
exim-users@exim.org> wrote:
> Hi, compile exim with support for spfquery, but not work.
>
> I read this documentation:
> https://github.com/Exim/exim/wiki/SPF
The above documentation says that the right hand side of
Hi, compile exim with support for spfquery, but not work.
I read this documentation:
https://github.com/Exim/exim/wiki/SPF
I send a test email with the an invalid from address but not work
spfquery --sender=soys...@gmail.com --ip=200.58.112.191
softfail
domain owner discourages use of this
