On 2022-10-31 Jeremy Harris via Exim-users wrote:
> On 30/10/2022 15:37, Andreas Metzler via Exim-users wrote:
> > a) Yes, but. It would be very nice if the whole exim distribution had
> > correct per-file attribution/copyright/license. However it is going to
> > be quite a bit of work and it is
On Mon, 31 Oct 2022, Heiko Schlittermann via Exim-users wrote:
From a legal point of view (but IANAL by any means), we probably
could find an SPDX identifier matching the *current* license
statement of each individual file, to match the *current* intent.
This implicates that the *current*
On 30/10/2022 15:37, Andreas Metzler via Exim-users wrote:
a) Yes, but. It would be very nice if the whole exim distribution had
correct per-file attribution/copyright/license. However it is going to
be quite a bit of work and it is the type of work with - well - limited
appeal for many.
Would
Jeremy Harris via Exim-users (So 30 Okt 2022 13:22:25
CET):
> Does anyone have opinions on the licensing of Exim?
I didn't think about Exim's licensing ever. For me Exim is just Free and
Open Source, whatever this means in detail, but *personally* most
important: no restrictions are applied to
• Jeremy Harris via Exim-users [2022-10-30 12:22]:
> Does anyone have opinions on the licensing of Exim?
>
> The project front-page ( https://exim.org/index.html )
> says "under the terms of the GNU General Public Licence",
> and links to the GPL page (which primarily promotes GPLv3,
> though
On 2022-10-30 Jeremy Harris via Exim-users wrote:
[...]
> Now, along comes SPDX: a standard for labelling files with
> the license that applies. Yup, we're late as usual...
> a) Do we care? Should we label every text file in sight?
>Or not take any action?
> b) Do existing licence
On 2022-10-30 Jeremy Harris via Exim-users wrote:
> Does anyone have opinions on the licensing of Exim?
> The project front-page ( https://exim.org/index.html )
> says "under the terms of the GNU General Public Licence",
> and links to the GPL page (which primarily promotes GPLv3,
> though older
Does anyone have opinions on the licensing of Exim?
The project front-page ( https://exim.org/index.html )
says "under the terms of the GNU General Public Licence",
and links to the GPL page (which primarily promotes GPLv3,
though older versions are present deeper in that site).
The earliest
