On 2022-01-29 at 05:26:21 UTC-0500 (Sat, 29 Jan 2022 10:26:21 +
(GMT))
Andrew C Aitchison via Exim-users
is rumored to have said:
On Fri, 28 Jan 2022, Bill Cole via Exim-users wrote:
On 2022-01-27 at 14:31:41 UTC-0500 (Thu, 27 Jan 2022 19:31:41 +
(GMT))
Andrew C Aitchison via
On Fri, 28 Jan 2022, Bill Cole via Exim-users wrote:
On 2022-01-27 at 14:31:41 UTC-0500 (Thu, 27 Jan 2022 19:31:41 + (GMT))
Andrew C Aitchison via Exim-users
is rumored to have said:
On Thu, 27 Jan 2022, Marcin Gryszkalis via Exim-users wrote:
[...]
- What do you think about
On 2022-01-27 at 14:31:41 UTC-0500 (Thu, 27 Jan 2022 19:31:41 +
(GMT))
Andrew C Aitchison via Exim-users
is rumored to have said:
On Thu, 27 Jan 2022, Marcin Gryszkalis via Exim-users wrote:
[...]
- What do you think about implementing re-folding headers to make
mail RFC-compliant
On 27/01/2022 19:31, Andrew C Aitchison via Exim-users wrote:
- What do you think about implementing re-folding headers to make mail
RFC-compliant again (ie. fix what outlook spolied)?
Unfortunately that can break DKIM signatures.
Obviously it would have to be optional, and with
On 27/01/2022 18:41, Marcin Gryszkalis via Exim-users wrote:
On 18.11.2021 21:00, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users wrote:> On 18/11/2021 10:35,
Andrea Biscuola via Exim-users wrote:
>> is. From what I was able to understand, we should modify the
>> remote_smtp and
>>
On Thu, 27 Jan 2022, Marcin Gryszkalis via Exim-users wrote:
On 18.11.2021 21:00, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users wrote:> On 18/11/2021
10:35, Andrea Biscuola via Exim-users wrote:
is. From what I was able to understand, we should modify the
remote_smtp and
remote_smtp_forward_transport sections
On 18.11.2021 21:00, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users wrote:> On 18/11/2021
10:35, Andrea Biscuola via Exim-users wrote:
>> is. From what I was able to understand, we should modify the
>> remote_smtp and
>> remote_smtp_forward_transport sections to solve the problem, with the
>>
(Adding to this thread because we only just now hit this issue …)
> On Nov 18, 2021, at 15:00, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users
> wrote:
>
> On 18/11/2021 10:35, Andrea Biscuola via Exim-users wrote:
>> One week ago, we upgraded to exim 4.95 and suddenly, some customers (using
>> microsoft
>>
On Thu, 18 Nov 2021 21:03:43 - (UTC)
Jasen Betts via Exim-users wrote:
> On 2021-11-18, Andrea Biscuola via Exim-users wrote:
> > Hi all
> >
> > We are an italian hosting provider (https://host.it) and we use exim to
> > relay e-mails from
> > our hosting servers.
> > Exim is installed and
On 18/11/2021 10:35, Andrea Biscuola via Exim-users wrote:
One week ago, we upgraded to exim 4.95 and suddenly, some customers (using
microsoft
outlook, nonetheless), started to experience the following error for *some* of
their
e-mails:
message has lines too long for transport
On 2021-11-18, Andrea Biscuola via Exim-users wrote:
> Hi all
>
> We are an italian hosting provider (https://host.it) and we use exim to relay
> e-mails from
> our hosting servers.
> Exim is installed and configured through the directadmin control panel
> (https://www.directadmin.com), so the
11 matches
Mail list logo
