On 2022-09-22, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users wrote:
>
> a3d3e7ef81 (just pushed) fixes this.
>
> Given the fix, does
>
>${listcount:${filter {a:p:p:l:e} {inlisti{$item}{ p:e:z
>
> look plausible?
Yes, that looks good.
--
Jasen.
--
## List details at
On 22/09/2022 13:48, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users wrote:
We could code to stack $value during each evaluation of the condition
for the reduce. That feels better. I'll have a go.
Turn out that's not sufficient. The issue is not that
the inlisti-output $value mucks up reduce, but that it
On 21/09/2022 06:21, Jasen Betts via Exim-users wrote:
I was using the follwing form to see how many elements of list 1 occur in list2
${reduce{ a:p:p:l:e }{0}{${if inlisti{$item}{ p:e:z
}{${eval:$value+1}}{$value
but this has stopped working in 4.96
To be fair, it wouldn't have worked
