On 19 February 2017 at 00:20, Jeremy Harris wrote:
> A touch over 25,180 characters on one line, yup, that... is larger
> than permitted by RFC 5321, section 4.5.3.1.6 (1000 octets including
> the CRLF).
> --
> Cheers,
> Jeremy
>
Sure. Actually, I just did 'exipick -iz |
A touch over 25,180 characters on one line, yup, that... is larger
than permitted by RFC 5321, section 4.5.3.1.6 (1000 octets including
the CRLF).
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use
On 18 February 2017 at 18:06, Jeremy Harris wrote:
> On 18/02/17 08:42, Odhiambo Washington via Exim-users wrote:
> >> dkim_strict set!
> >>
> >> Monitoring.
> >>
> >>
> > I ended with hundreds of frozen messages after this:
> >
> > 2017-02-18 11:36:46 1cenKm-000GYy-Np DKIM:
On 18/02/17 08:42, Odhiambo Washington via Exim-users wrote:
>> dkim_strict set!
>>
>> Monitoring.
>>
>>
> I ended with hundreds of frozen messages after this:
>
> 2017-02-18 11:36:46 1cenKm-000GYy-Np DKIM: signing failed: RSA_LONG_LINE
> 2017-02-18 11:36:46 1cenKm-000GYy-Np == j...@doe.main
On 16 February 2017 at 16:33, Odhiambo Washington
wrote:
>
>
> On 16 February 2017 at 15:44, Jeremy Harris wrote:
>
>> On 16/02/17 12:37, Odhiambo Washington via Exim-users wrote:
>> > On 16 February 2017 at 14:50, Jeremy Harris wrote:
>>
On 16 February 2017 at 15:44, Jeremy Harris wrote:
> On 16/02/17 12:37, Odhiambo Washington via Exim-users wrote:
> > On 16 February 2017 at 14:50, Jeremy Harris wrote:
> >
> >> On 16/02/17 10:37, Odhiambo Washington via Exim-users wrote:
> >>> Anyone seeing
On 16 February 2017 at 14:50, Jeremy Harris wrote:
> On 16/02/17 10:37, Odhiambo Washington via Exim-users wrote:
> > Anyone seeing what I am seeing with RC5?
> >
> > 2017-02-15 19:53:23 1ce2pV-0007Hw-Iy DKIM: signing failed: RSA_LONG_LINE
>
> Are you trying to send mails, and
On 16/02/17 12:37, Odhiambo Washington via Exim-users wrote:
> On 16 February 2017 at 14:50, Jeremy Harris wrote:
>
>> On 16/02/17 10:37, Odhiambo Washington via Exim-users wrote:
>>> Anyone seeing what I am seeing with RC5?
>>>
>>> 2017-02-15 19:53:23 1ce2pV-0007Hw-Iy DKIM:
On 16/02/17 10:37, Odhiambo Washington via Exim-users wrote:
> Anyone seeing what I am seeing with RC5?
>
> 2017-02-15 19:53:23 1ce2pV-0007Hw-Iy DKIM: signing failed: RSA_LONG_LINE
Are you trying to send mails, and sign them, having single lines that
are longer than 16KB ?
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
Anyone seeing what I am seeing with RC5?
2017-02-15 19:53:23 1ce2pV-0007Hw-Iy DKIM: signing failed: RSA_LONG_LINE
2017-02-15 19:53:23 1ce2pV-0007Hw-GE DKIM: signing failed: RSA_LONG_LINE
2017-02-15 19:53:23 1ce2pV-0007Hw-Lc DKIM: signing failed: RSA_LONG_LINE
2017-02-15 19:53:23 1ce2pT-0007Hw-V4
On 2017-02-14 at 11:07 +0100, mar...@mejor.pl wrote:
> With 4.89_RC5 I'm still gettinf segfaults described here
> https://lists.exim.org/lurker/message/20170119.140550.3f2d5c60.en.html
Ugh.
Deterministic on every invocation for mails to those domains, or
"sometimes"?
What's the output with
W dniu 13.02.2017 o 00:21, Phil Pennock pisze:
> I know it's three RCs in as many days, but we think each is a step
> better and if we can ensure that people who start their RC testing
> during the work-week can have a week to bake and find any remaining
> issues, that's good.
>
> I have uploaded
12 matches
Mail list logo