On 22/05/18 07:41, Хлебалов Степан via Exim-users wrote:
>> Were the extra 20 recipients accepted by exim?
> Don't know. There is no extra 20 recipients in main.log for this queue.
> Only 100.
I'm guessing you mean the on the <= log line, 100 recipients
are listed. These are envelope recipients.
On 22/05/18 07:41, Хлебалов Степан via Exim-users wrote:
> Is log_selector = +all enough or does way exist to add more logging?
On that specific point: there's always debug mode - but it gets
very voluminous.
--
Jeremy
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
On Tue, 22 May 2018, Хлебалов Степан via Exim-users wrote:
> It's far more likely you hit the 100 default on the
> smtp transport (max_rcpt)
In smtp transport I already added
mac_rcpt = 150.
Should be
max_rcpt = 150
with an "x". Is the typo in the config, or just the email ?
--
##
On 2018-05-21 14:12, Jeremy Harris wrote:
> On 21/05/18 11:49, Хлебалов Степан via Exim-users wrote:
> > I am trying to send mail with 120 recipients.
> > First 100 recipients received this mail, other recipients were not.
> > There is nothing in main.log or reject.log about undelivered copies.
>
Am 22.05.2018 um 18:29 schrieb Kurt Jaeger:
> Hi!
>
>> the german office of security ( BSI ) has given out a policy, that
>> secure emailserver should have implemented DANE.
> Can you elaborate ? Where / when did BSI say so ?
>
You can find it here:
Hi!
> the german office of security ( BSI ) has given out a policy, that
> secure emailserver should have implemented DANE.
Can you elaborate ? Where / when did BSI say so ?
--
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 31013722 years to go !
--
## List details at
Am 22. Mai 2018 18:09:24 MESZ schrieb Cyborg via Exim-users
:
>Hi Guys,
>
>the german office of security ( BSI ) has given out a policy, that
>secure emailserver should have implemented DANE.
DANE is "nice" by theory - and the german BSI is a entity mainly driven by
Hi Guys,
the german office of security ( BSI ) has given out a policy, that
secure emailserver should have implemented DANE.
So, whats the status of DANE for Exim?
Any usefull selfexplaning examples at hand ? :)
best regards,
Marius
--
## List details at
> On May 22, 2018, at 12:09 PM, Cyborg via Exim-users
> wrote:
>
> So, whats the status of DANE for Exim?
>
> Any usefull selfexplaning examples at hand ? :)
Have you looked at:
Hello group.
I explain my work scenario. I use exim as smtp service, where I have black
lists of domains in order to avoid analyzing emails that I know are garbage.
through spamassassin I did not have this problem, first the message came to
exim and it discarded it, now the mail first arrives
Hi!
> >> the german office of security ( BSI ) has given out a policy, that
> >> secure emailserver should have implemented DANE.
> > Can you elaborate ? Where / when did BSI say so ?
> You can find it here:
>
>
Am 22. Mai 2018 21:29:01 MESZ schrieb Viktor Dukhovni via Exim-users
:
>It takes time for implementations to reach end-users and for
>management tools to mature. This is the early adopter phase,
DANE is very young? And some of the largest mail ISPs doesnt have the "time" or
> On May 22, 2018, at 1:00 PM, Niels Dettenbach (Syndicat IT & Internet) via
> Exim-users wrote:
>
> Am 22. Mai 2018 18:09:24 MESZ schrieb Cyborg via Exim-users
> :
>> Hi Guys,
>>
>> the german office of security ( BSI ) has given out a policy, that
On 22/05/18 17:48, Emanuel Gonzalez via Exim-users wrote:
> How can I prevent rspamd from analyzing emails from domains that I know send
> spam? Should I use a prefilter?
Verbs in an ACL are run in textual order. Read the ACLs chapter in
the documentation.
--
Jeremy
--
## List details at
Am 22.05.2018 um 19:30 schrieb Viktor Dukhovni via Exim-users:
>
> This also checks that the hash is not the hash of an empty input,
> due to failure of "openssl x509" and/or "openssl pkey".
Oh yes.. i had those too with one of exim hashuing routine. Instead of
returning NULL,
if the string was
On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 12:30:23PM -0400, Viktor Dukhovni via Exim-users wrote:
> One small correction to the text below:
>
>https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7671#section-5.2.2
Perhaps another tweak would be useful, in the below:
At the time of writing, https://www.huque.com/bin/gen_tlsa
16 matches
Mail list logo