On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 15:15:18 +0200, Marcin Mirosław mar...@mejor.pl
wrote:
Hello!
I've set up smtp transport in this way:
external_smtp_batv:
driver = smtp
return_path = ${prvs {$return_path}{BATVKEY}}
dkim_domain =
On Thu, 1 Jul 2010 at 20:47 +0100, Marcin Mirosław wrote
Yes, i read it. But i don't speak well english and maybe i can't catch
nuance.
My understanding is that if a domain has both v4 and v6 addresses Exim
first uses the operating system to decide whether to use v6 or v4 (and
Phil has
On 1 July 2010 17:39, John Horne john.ho...@plymouth.ac.uk wrote:
On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 16:58 +0100, Ian Eiloart wrote:
Using SRS without publishing an SPF record of your own
risks downgrading messages from pass to no unknown.
I don't quite follow this. My understanding was that when SRS was
W dniu 02.07.2010 11:50, J.R.Haynes pisze:
Hi!
My understanding is that if a domain has both v4 and v6 addresses Exim
first uses the operating system to decide whether to use v6 or v4 (and
Phil has explained how to change this globally). Then it looks at the
interface option for the first
On 2 Jul 2010, at 11:30, Marcin Mirosław wrote:
I was sure, that setting interace=address v4 will force exim to use
only v4 for given domain (even if domain has record ). My mistake
was that i thought about v4 and v6 as they are in common space.
Are you able to suggest a change/addition
W dniu 02.07.2010 12:51, Nigel Metheringham pisze:
On 2 Jul 2010, at 11:30, Marcin Mirosław wrote:
I was sure, that setting interace=address v4 will force exim to use
only v4 for given domain (even if domain has record ). My mistake
was that i thought about v4 and v6 as they are in
