Heiko Schlittermann (Fr 25 Nov 2016 00:21:01 CET):
>
> The first smarthost mailhub1 refused right after the TCP connect with
> 4xx. The second refused right after the TCP connect with 5xx.
>
> Now Exim gave up and sent a bounce (actually didn't send a bounce,
> because
Hi,
if've a simple setup
….
begin routers
smarthost:
driver = manualroute
route_data = mailhub1:mailhub2
transport = remote_smtp
no_more
…
begin retry
* * F,2h,15m; G,16h,1h,1.5; F,4d,6h
…
The first smarthost mailhub1 refused right
On 24/11/16 14:26, Marcin Mirosław wrote:
> 2016-11-24 15:17:11 [32497] 1c9upo-0008S9-2c H=([37.255.216.195])
> [37.255.216.195] I=[81.4.122.249]:25 Warning: testing rspamd: rspamd::
> X-Rspamd_score_int: 396 X-rspamd_action: reject ; spamassassin:: X-Spa
> m_score_int: 331 X-Spam_action: reject
>
W dniu 24.11.2016 o 16:04, Heiko Schlittermann pisze:
> Hi Marcin,
>
> Marcin Mirosław (Do 24 Nov 2016 15:26:40 CET):
>> Hi!
>> I just found in exim log something strange for me.
>> This is snippet from log:
>> 2016-11-24 15:17:11 [32497] 1c9upo-0008S9-2c H=([37.255.216.195])
>>
Hi Marcin,
Marcin Mirosław (Do 24 Nov 2016 15:26:40 CET):
> Hi!
> I just found in exim log something strange for me.
> This is snippet from log:
> 2016-11-24 15:17:11 [32497] 1c9upo-0008S9-2c H=([37.255.216.195])
> [37.255.216.195] I=[81.4.122.249]:25 Warning: testing rspamd:
Hi!
I just found in exim log something strange for me.
This is snippet from log:
2016-11-24 15:17:11 [32497] 1c9upo-0008S9-2c H=([37.255.216.195])
[37.255.216.195] I=[81.4.122.249]:25 Warning: testing rspamd: rspamd::
X-Rspamd_score_int: 396 X-rspamd_action: reject ; spamassassin:: X-Spa