On 26/02/17 12:04, Phil Pennock wrote:
> On 2017-02-26 at 13:24 +0200, Victor Ustugov wrote:
>> Phil Pennock wrote:
>>> I'm perplexed. Either my bisect run-script is bad,
>>
>> So, is this bisect run-script useless and I may skip it?
>
> Nope, the script is good. :-(
>
> https://bugs.exim.org/s
On 2017-02-26 at 13:24 +0200, Victor Ustugov wrote:
> Phil Pennock wrote:
> > I'm perplexed. Either my bisect run-script is bad,
>
> So, is this bisect run-script useless and I may skip it?
Nope, the script is good. :-(
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2061
Reverting that commit resolves
On 2017-02-25 at 22:25 -0500, Phil Pennock wrote:
> 20fcb1e7be45177beca2d433f54260843cc7c2f6 is the first bad commit
> commit 20fcb1e7be45177beca2d433f54260843cc7c2f6
> At this point, I suspect that the issue is the current line 4974 of
> expand.c, where `lookup_value = NULL` while skipping, but i
Hello, Phil.
Thanks for your reply.
Phil Pennock wrote:
> On 2017-02-25 at 22:25 -0500, Phil Pennock wrote:
>> 20fcb1e7be45177beca2d433f54260843cc7c2f6 is the first bad commit
>> commit 20fcb1e7be45177beca2d433f54260843cc7c2f6
>
>> At this point, I suspect that the issue is the current line 4974