[exim] ${address: foo(comment)@bar.org}

2019-02-12 Thread Jasen Betts via Exim-users
the string expansion operator ${address: doesn't seem to strip RFC5322 comments (described in section 3.2.2) https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5322#section-3.2.2 An extreme example: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5322#appendix-A.5 Should it be doing that? (I could write a patch if this

Re: [exim] ACL 'senders' condition doesn't seem to look at 'From' header

2019-02-12 Thread Jasen Betts via Exim-users
On 2019-02-13, Adam Nielsen via Exim-users wrote: > Hi all, > > I am using this ACL to block addresses/domains repeatedly used by > spammers, by looking them up in a file: > > deny > senders = @@partial-lsearch;/srv/mail/config/sender_blacklist > add_header = X-Spam-Report: Sender in

[exim] ACL 'senders' condition doesn't seem to look at 'From' header

2019-02-12 Thread Adam Nielsen via Exim-users
Hi all, I am using this ACL to block addresses/domains repeatedly used by spammers, by looking them up in a file: deny senders = @@partial-lsearch;/srv/mail/config/sender_blacklist add_header = X-Spam-Report: Sender in blacklist, message rejected However I still have some messages

[exim] The Google Lie

2019-02-12 Thread Christian Balzer via Exim-users
Hello, we've been seeing these (and customer reports/complaints) increasingly in the last weeks: --- host gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com [64.233.189.26] SMTP error from remote mail server after end of data: 550-5.7.1 This message does not have authentication information or fails to

Re: [exim] exim spfquery config

2019-02-12 Thread Christian Balzer via Exim-users
On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 23:36:26 + Graeme Fowler via Exim-users wrote: [we do hatez the mangling and inability to just reply to this ML anymore] > On 12 Feb 2019, at 21:56, Sebastian Nielsen via Exim-users > wrote: > > I disagree with this. So many organizations that have had softfail for > >

Re: [exim] exim spfquery config

2019-02-12 Thread Graeme Fowler via Exim-users
On 12 Feb 2019, at 21:56, Sebastian Nielsen via Exim-users wrote: > I disagree with this. So many organizations that have had softfail for > several tens of years for no apparent reason. Gmail is no exception. There’s no way in the SPF definition to indicate “apparent reason”. You either have

Re: [exim] exim spfquery config

2019-02-12 Thread Sebastian Nielsen via Exim-users
> However do please be cautious about denying messages that only softfail. I disagree with this. So many organizations that have had softfail for several tens of years for no apparent reason. Gmail is no exception. - C:\Users\Sebastian Nielsen>nslookup -type=TXT gmail.com Server:

Re: [exim] exim spfquery config

2019-02-12 Thread Mike Brudenell via Exim-users
Hi, Emanuel - On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 at 15:42, Emanuel Gonzalez via Exim-users < exim-users@exim.org> wrote: > Hi, compile exim with support for spfquery, but not work. > > I read this documentation: > https://github.com/Exim/exim/wiki/SPF The above documentation says that the right hand side of

[exim] exim spfquery config

2019-02-12 Thread Emanuel Gonzalez via Exim-users
Hi, compile exim with support for spfquery, but not work. I read this documentation: https://github.com/Exim/exim/wiki/SPF I send a test email with the an invalid from address but not work spfquery --sender=soys...@gmail.com --ip=200.58.112.191 softfail domain owner discourages use of this