An unwanted message arrived to my mailbox with the following Subject:
Subject:
=?UTF-8?B?VXMgY29uZ3Jlc3MgaGVhcmluZyBvZiBtYWFuIGFsc2FhbiBNb25leSBsYXVuZHJ5INmC?=
=?UTF-8?B?2LbZitipINin2YTZg9mI2YbYutis2LHYsyDZhNi62LPZitmEINin2YTYo9mF2YjYp9mEINmE2YTZhdmE?=
On 16/04/2019 10:18, Graeme Fowler via Exim-users wrote:
> On 16 Apr 2019, at 04:27, Konstantin Boyandin (lists) via Exim-users
> wrote:
>> Is there any Exim setting capable of re-formatting long headers (i.e., split
>> them into several lines, each below 998 character limit) etc such headers,
On 16 Apr 2019, at 5:18, Graeme Fowler via Exim-users wrote:
HOWEVER: I don’t think this is advisable, as you could break DKIM
signing if the over-long header is included in the signature.
Because header folding is a permissible in-flight message modification
per RFC822 & its successors, the
On 14/04/2019 02:40, Jasen Betts via Exim-users wrote:
On 2019-04-13, Rainer Dorsch via Exim-users wrote:
Hi,
I want to upgrade my server from Debian Jessie to Debian Stretch. I am afraid
that at some time during the upgrade process, there is an invalid exim
configuration and messages get
On 16 Apr 2019, at 04:27, Konstantin Boyandin (lists) via Exim-users
wrote:
> Is there any Exim setting capable of re-formatting long headers (i.e., split
> them into several lines, each below 998 character limit) etc such headers,
> but allowing the incoming mail nonetheless?
I feel your
Hi, Konstantin.
On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 03:27:57AM +, Konstantin Boyandin (lists) via
Exim-users wrote:
> One of users complained at having their message rejected by our mail
> server (Exim 4.91), providing the below server response:
>
> "Mail delivery error. This email issue occurs
