Re: [exim] mail stuck in /var/spool/exim4/input

2020-06-04 Thread Andreas Metzler via Exim-users
On 2020-06-04 Jeremy Harris via Exim-users wrote: > On 04/06/2020 16:38, Andreas Metzler via Exim-users wrote: > > You are running 4.94-1 configuration with 4.92.3-1 binaries. > I'm starting to wonder if these sorts of checks need support > from Exim predefined macros. [...] Hello, I do not

Re: [exim] mail stuck in /var/spool/exim4/input

2020-06-04 Thread Jeremy Harris via Exim-users
On 04/06/2020 16:38, Andreas Metzler via Exim-users wrote: > You are running 4.94-1 configuration with 4.92.3-1 binaries. I'm starting to wonder if these sorts of checks need support from Exim predefined macros. We could define one fairly easily where the _name_ of the macro includes the Exim

Re: [exim] mail stuck in /var/spool/exim4/input

2020-06-04 Thread Andreas Metzler via Exim-users
On 2020-06-02 m s via Exim-users wrote: > I'm running Debian sid and after upgrading packages today, exim stopped > working. It's keeping all my local mail in /var/spool/exim4/input and > not delivering it, and even when I type "runq" it won't deliver the > mail. > # exim4 -qff -v [...] > T:

Re: [exim] exim samba4 active directory

2020-06-04 Thread Benoît PELISSIER via Exim-users
Hi Marco, thanks for your answer. So third block is router. And first and second ? Where can i put here ? First on main exim config ? Second on transport exim config ? Sorry for my stupid question ! Why there is not template on https://www.exim.org/ ? Nobody use exim as mta on ldap/AD ?

[exim] [ADMIN] Couple of points

2020-06-04 Thread Graeme Fowler via Exim-users
Hi all Hope you're all well. 1. Please ensure that you post messages to the list from your subscribed address. Recently there's been a number of occasions where messages have been held for moderation un-necessarily because the sender address is not the list member's subscribed address - if

Re: [exim] Taint mismatch in spam checking

2020-06-04 Thread James via Exim-users
On 03/06/2020 18:03, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users wrote: It's a "spam=" ACL condition, and you're feeding it a tainted string on the right of the =. It is however it is authenticated before use so surely can't be rouge else "authenticated = *" is not true. I can untaint it by doing:

Re: [exim] Taint mismatch, string_nextinlist: acl_check_condition 3675

2020-06-04 Thread Jeremy Harris via Exim-users
On 04/06/2020 04:38, list2--- via Exim-users wrote: > set acl_m0   = $local_part@$domain > > > warn spam    = $acl_m0:true > add_header  = X-Spam-Report: $spam_report Either: a) pick up commit 12b7f811de from git and rebuild your exim or b) use checked, untainted variables to