Re: [exim] Why "blackhole"?

2018-03-12 Thread Luca Bertoncello via Exim-users
Mike Brudenell via Exim-users schrieb: Hi Mike > The sample configuration you posted is just a set of ACLs entries. The This was NOT a sample configuration, but the real configuration we use to scan the E-Mail with Kaspersky... > *Specification* seems to be saying that

Re: [exim] Why "blackhole"?

2018-03-12 Thread Mike Brudenell via Exim-users
On 12 March 2018 at 15:59, Luca Bertoncello via Exim-users < exim-users@exim.org> wrote: > > Yes! Kaspersky. And I must say, that I already had some suspect on that... > > If local_scan says to accept the message but it has no recipients left it >> is blackholed. >> > > OK, thanks. > But I really

Re: [exim] Why "blackhole"?

2018-03-12 Thread Luca Bertoncello via Exim-users
Zitat von Mike Brudenell via Exim-users : Hi Mike Have you added a local_scan function to your configuration? Yes! Kaspersky. And I must say, that I already had some suspect on that...

Re: [exim] Why "blackhole"?

2018-03-12 Thread Mike Brudenell via Exim-users
Have you added a local_scan function to your configuration? https://www.exim.org/exim-html-current/doc/html/spec_html/ch-adding_a_local_scan_function_to_exim.html If so, then it sounds like it has decided to discard all the recipients for that incoming message. If you read the *Specification*

[exim] Why "blackhole"?

2018-03-12 Thread Luca Bertoncello via Exim-users
Hi list, I recently discovered this very curiously message in the mainlog: 2018-02-28 00:56:11 1eqp6G-0004wp-IR DKIM: d=email.microsoftemail.com s=102420140131 c=relaxed/relaxed a=rsa-sha1 b=1024 [verification succeeded] 2018-02-28 00:56:12 1eqp6G-0004wp-IR LMS check accept: 250 OK